Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

'Razzi Snap: One Question For UN Ambassador Lakdhar Brahimi On Darfur & Celebrities

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

brahimi.jpgI attended a lecture by UN Ambassador Lakdhar Brahimi this evening at Cornell University and managed to get a couple questions in on the situation in Darfur and celebrity support. In terms of background, you can’t get much deeper than Brahimi. Not only was he the UN representative in Iraq and Afghanistan; he’s also until recently been the special adviser to the Secretery-General in NY. His new role is as a UN Envoy for the Darfur crisis. As we’ve often mentioned, there’s tremendous desperation and displacement in this region; with over 2.5 million refugees and close to 200,000 estimated dead. Celebrities have attempted to get the word out through activism with campaigns such as Rock Darfur! I was curious to see how a politician on the inside thought of their efforts.

Ecorazzi: “Ambassador Brahimi, we’ve seen efforts by people like George Clooney and his father Nick to bring home video and stories of the suffering in Darfur. With campaigns like Rock Darfur! and others, do you believe celebrities are doing more than politics to bring awareness to the situation?”

Brahimi: “I’ve never met Clooney. I’ve seen some of the video, however, and it’s fantastic. The media, the celebrities, they’re all amazing. Every bit of support helps. I met with a group of celebrities last week in London. The support is encouraging. I met an American actor, not Clooney, I can’t remember his name. The enthusiasm from this gentleman was excellent. Every bit helps. Every bit. We’re trying.”

Did I mention it was brief? But hey, it was encouraging to hear that conversation between those on the inside and those out there working for change is occurring. The questions is, who’s doing a better job?

Like us on Facebook:

Collaborating with animal exploiters won’t help animals

The two sides claim to both have the “health and well-being of animals” in mind in this partnership, but one likely said “after profitability” under their breath.

Exploitation for art is no worse than exploitation for dinner

It always seems to come back to a confused juror deciding when animal use is justified.

Humane Society Serves Pork to Save Dogs…WTF?!

All animals matter morally, equally.