Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

Jay-Z's Faux-Fur Coat Actually Comes From A Cute Chinese Dog

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

rocowear.jpgWhoops. In the latest fur-flying episode of celebrities and their fashion faux pas, Shawn “Jay-Z” Carter joins Sean “Diddy” Combs as the most recent hip-hop/fashion mogul to screw up a coat label.

Acting on a hunch that other fashion celebs might not be paying too close attention to their outfit origins, the Humane Society of the US purchased a “faux-fur” coat from Jay-Z’s Rocawear website, and had the lining tested. The test showed that the fur was taken from raccoon dogs—a type of dog raised for fur in China.

Customers had no way of knowing if the faux-fur claims were real since a federal loophole exists that allows coats with fur valued at $150 or less to have no label. Jay-Z’s coat is a disturbing trend in which assumed fake accessories are actually the fur of animals potentially skinned alive. The HSUS is working hard to investigate other similar claims. From the article,

“The HSUS has found problems on jackets by retailers and designers at all price levels. Mass spectrometry testing of fur-trimmed jackets from a variety of designers and retailers revealed that nine out of 10 were found to contain raccoon dog fur.”

So the question remains: Jay-Z, what are you going to do about this?

Like us on Facebook:
0 Comments

Hardheaded Vegan Bullies, and What to Do About Them

My “fighting words” are not calling someone “elitist,” “stupid,” or a “lunatic.” They’re “education,” “freedom,” and “equality.”

Protesting Kylie Jenner’s Use of Fur Doesn’t Help Animals

Campaigns against fur, whether that’s at the PETA level or a small mobbing like this, don’t work because they promote the use of other animal products.

Collaborating with animal exploiters won’t help animals

The two sides claim to both have the “health and well-being of animals” in mind in this partnership, but one likely said “after profitability” under their breath.