Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

Charles's Green Ways Stirs Up Conflict In The Royal Family

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

Who knew that being a fierce protector of the environment could lead to growing bitterness and resentment within one’s family? It seems like the Queen feels Prince Charles should ease up on his environmental crusade. While Charles is striving to make greener changes to his lifestyle and traveling options, his brothers Prince Edward and Prince Andrew have come under fire for their air travel habits, and the rest of the royal family is being scrutinized as well. His campaigns are said to be “putting others under scrutiny to prove their own green credentials.”

It’s not as juicy as the scandals that rocked the British royals long ago, but it’s still problematic. Does this mean that they have no intention of working for the environment? Or maybe they’re simply not prepared to make certain changes? Will Charles tone down his campaign? If I were the Queen, I’d probably put my foot down and give the entire household a good talking-to and tell them that it’s a good thing for Charles to be supporting the environment. From the sound of the article though, it doesn’t appear as though she herself is enthused by his cause.

Like us on Facebook:
0 Comments

Hardheaded Vegan Bullies, and What to Do About Them

My “fighting words” are not calling someone “elitist,” “stupid,” or a “lunatic.” They’re “education,” “freedom,” and “equality.”

Protesting Kylie Jenner’s Use of Fur Doesn’t Help Animals

Campaigns against fur, whether that’s at the PETA level or a small mobbing like this, don’t work because they promote the use of other animal products.

Collaborating with animal exploiters won’t help animals

The two sides claim to both have the “health and well-being of animals” in mind in this partnership, but one likely said “after profitability” under their breath.