Comments on: Newsweek Interview With Clooney: For Non-U.S. Eyes Only http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/02/08/newsweek-interview-with-clooney-for-non-us-eyes-only/ Causes Entertainment Lifestyle Pop Culture Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:37:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Newsweek Interview With Clooney: For Non-U.S. Eyes Only : Clooney Unlimited http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/02/08/newsweek-interview-with-clooney-for-non-us-eyes-only/comment-page-1/#comment-204790 Newsweek Interview With Clooney: For Non-U.S. Eyes Only : Clooney Unlimited Fri, 23 Jan 2009 06:14:53 +0000 http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=1472#comment-204790 [...] Interesting, right? What do you think? Is Newsweek innocent here or are they attempting to protect themselves by not releasing this in the U.S.? Why would they censor a George Clooney interview from the U.S. market? Source [...] [...] Interesting, right? What do you think? Is Newsweek innocent here or are they attempting to protect themselves by not releasing this in the U.S.? Why would they censor a George Clooney interview from the U.S. market? Source [...]

]]> By: Tammy http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/02/08/newsweek-interview-with-clooney-for-non-us-eyes-only/comment-page-1/#comment-5517 Tammy Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:03:15 +0000 http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=1472#comment-5517 How is the prior post a response to the media's weakness regarding the war on terror? This is a way to criticize George for knowing someone who is *allegedly* being paid for legal services to someone else. He doesn't tell the lawyer what other cases he can or can't take. Absurd. Come back when you have something to say that is worth reading...and is actually about what you say it is about. How is the prior post a response to the media’s weakness regarding the war on terror? This is a way to criticize George for knowing someone who is *allegedly* being paid for legal services to someone else. He doesn’t tell the lawyer what other cases he can or can’t take.

Absurd. Come back when you have something to say that is worth reading…and is actually about what you say it is about.

]]> By: spam onigiri http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/02/08/newsweek-interview-with-clooney-for-non-us-eyes-only/comment-page-1/#comment-5268 spam onigiri Thu, 08 Feb 2007 23:45:29 +0000 http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=1472#comment-5268 Umm, with regard to the media taking a pass on Iraq. Immediately, after 9/11, the Bush Administration enlisted George Clooney's attorney (who is also a member of the Committee of Present Danger and former president of the American Jewish Committee - note, her was the pres of the AJC while on the CDP and when Bush administration officials courted him) to help sell the War on Terror. And, per Bush, Iraq is the major front on the war on terror. So when you are propagandizing the War on Terror, you are also selling the War on Iraq. In light of the fact that some in the know believe that the War on Iraq was just a pretext to invade Iran and is supposedly the battleground for the WAR ON TERROR, perhaps George should criticize his attorney not the media for the pass on Iraq. His attorney is just as complicit as anyone for us being in Iraq. Umm, with regard to the media taking a pass on Iraq. Immediately, after 9/11, the Bush Administration enlisted George Clooney’s attorney (who is also a member of the Committee of Present Danger and former president of the American Jewish Committee – note, her was the pres of the AJC while on the CDP and when Bush administration officials courted him) to help sell the War on Terror. And, per Bush, Iraq is the major front on the war on terror. So when you are propagandizing the War on Terror, you are also selling the War on Iraq.

In light of the fact that some in the know believe that the War on Iraq was just a pretext to invade Iran and is supposedly the battleground for the WAR ON TERROR, perhaps George should criticize his attorney not the media for the pass on Iraq. His attorney is just as complicit as anyone for us being in Iraq.

]]>