<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sigourney Weaver To Narrate Planet Earth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/02/21/sigourney-weaver-to-narrate-planet-earth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/02/21/sigourney-weaver-to-narrate-planet-earth/</link>
	<description>celebrities caught green-handed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:01:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/02/21/sigourney-weaver-to-narrate-planet-earth/comment-page-2/#comment-387640</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=1623#comment-387640</guid>
		<description>Anyone who is an advocate for nature documentaries, will agree that David Attenborough is the quintessential narrator. Not only is his voice fantastic and so emotional, but he&#039;s usually directly involved with such productions. He&#039;s a world renowned activist &amp; naturalist. If you loved this documentary, do whatever you can to check out BBC&#039;s newest, &quot;Life.&quot; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_%28BBC_TV_series%29 This series is just as, if not more, compelling than Planet Earth and it&#039;s currently being aired in the UK. They&#039;ve aired 3 of the 10 episodes so far, and it&#039;s breathtaking!! Anyway, I have no problem with Sigourney, but in comparison to Attenborough, she is emotionless and bland.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who is an advocate for nature documentaries, will agree that David Attenborough is the quintessential narrator. Not only is his voice fantastic and so emotional, but he&#8217;s usually directly involved with such productions. He&#8217;s a world renowned activist &amp; naturalist. If you loved this documentary, do whatever you can to check out BBC&#8217;s newest, &#8220;Life.&#8221; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_%28BBC_TV_series%29" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_%28BBC_TV_series%29</a> This series is just as, if not more, compelling than Planet Earth and it&#8217;s currently being aired in the UK. They&#8217;ve aired 3 of the 10 episodes so far, and it&#8217;s breathtaking!! Anyway, I have no problem with Sigourney, but in comparison to Attenborough, she is emotionless and bland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manik</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/02/21/sigourney-weaver-to-narrate-planet-earth/comment-page-2/#comment-378973</link>
		<dc:creator>Manik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 00:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=1623#comment-378973</guid>
		<description>I wanted to offer my PERSONAL opinion as a film director, as well as what i understand from after reading about the narration debate on this website as well as all others (that I could find) on the web. I know it is human nature to dislike when somebody else do not like the things they like, but the point is to try to say, if they handed me 25 million dollars and asked me to choose a narrator for 11 episodes (no other factors withstanding), what would i have done?

Hereby, wanna say firstly, I watched both the versions, every frame of it, for a couple of times, first runs to enjoy it, purely, then other runs to try to understand how they filmed it (from a professional point of interest and from artistic point of interest). I paid attention to the feature as a whole, I paid attention to the cinematography, the cinematographic storytelling, the light, ambience and shadows, the (natural) sound, the sorround sound, the sound with regard to storytelling, the music, the moods of the music, the editing, each scene trying to see if it was real speed, sped-up, slowed-down or time-lapse, and then finally, ofcourse, the narration.

I think everyone here is right about what they think, but one should try to think from both sides. I feel that for a feature of such a scale, everything needs to be perfect, as much as it can. The biggest movies go through the tiniest of details, likewise for this series, I think everyone agrees that the cinematography, the music, the visual story-telling is perfect, world-class and revolutionary. Based on this alone why would I not want to use a world-class narrator? Why the hell would I want to intentionally dumb-down, or tone-down certain things in my production and knowingly scale-down the spectacle?

People here are saying Ms Weaver&#039;s narration is plain and helps us to concentrate on the visuals, but its not just about the visuals, its about the emotion of how you felt inside your heart, she needs to help you get into that state, she needs to input that subconscious magic that will help to get us there. A great movie its more than visuals or music or pictures, its about magic and stuff that blow you away, and all this is only possible when every element in the movie / feature is world-class and on par with each other.

You can feel it, the shock when you hear, &quot;The Amur is the rarest cat in the World ...... there are only 40 of them left&quot; .. thats when Sir Attenborough says it. You feel the sarcasm, when he talkes about the Chimpanzee&#039;s next closest-relative, ourselves.., you feel. Basically, you feel things, you feel extra things, emotions, state-of-mind, with Attenborough.., that is something special. If a voice-talent can get you that, that is magic. Weaver will get you through the series, and you wouldn&#039;t complain, you&#039;d be satisfied, but still its only seven clours, you don&#039;t discover the &#039;eight color&#039;.

I understand why people try so defiantly to defend their poinst-of-view, those who are fans of Ms. Weaver to argue why she&#039;s better and those who are fans of Sir. Attenborough to argue why he&#039;s bettter. But if I was responosible for 25 milllion dollars to shoot the series and it was in my hands to choose the better talent, and knowing how difficult everything in filmaking is, how competitive it is, I&#039;d only settle for the very best, the very, very best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to offer my PERSONAL opinion as a film director, as well as what i understand from after reading about the narration debate on this website as well as all others (that I could find) on the web. I know it is human nature to dislike when somebody else do not like the things they like, but the point is to try to say, if they handed me 25 million dollars and asked me to choose a narrator for 11 episodes (no other factors withstanding), what would i have done?</p>
<p>Hereby, wanna say firstly, I watched both the versions, every frame of it, for a couple of times, first runs to enjoy it, purely, then other runs to try to understand how they filmed it (from a professional point of interest and from artistic point of interest). I paid attention to the feature as a whole, I paid attention to the cinematography, the cinematographic storytelling, the light, ambience and shadows, the (natural) sound, the sorround sound, the sound with regard to storytelling, the music, the moods of the music, the editing, each scene trying to see if it was real speed, sped-up, slowed-down or time-lapse, and then finally, ofcourse, the narration.</p>
<p>I think everyone here is right about what they think, but one should try to think from both sides. I feel that for a feature of such a scale, everything needs to be perfect, as much as it can. The biggest movies go through the tiniest of details, likewise for this series, I think everyone agrees that the cinematography, the music, the visual story-telling is perfect, world-class and revolutionary. Based on this alone why would I not want to use a world-class narrator? Why the hell would I want to intentionally dumb-down, or tone-down certain things in my production and knowingly scale-down the spectacle?</p>
<p>People here are saying Ms Weaver&#8217;s narration is plain and helps us to concentrate on the visuals, but its not just about the visuals, its about the emotion of how you felt inside your heart, she needs to help you get into that state, she needs to input that subconscious magic that will help to get us there. A great movie its more than visuals or music or pictures, its about magic and stuff that blow you away, and all this is only possible when every element in the movie / feature is world-class and on par with each other.</p>
<p>You can feel it, the shock when you hear, &#8220;The Amur is the rarest cat in the World &#8230;&#8230; there are only 40 of them left&#8221; .. thats when Sir Attenborough says it. You feel the sarcasm, when he talkes about the Chimpanzee&#8217;s next closest-relative, ourselves.., you feel. Basically, you feel things, you feel extra things, emotions, state-of-mind, with Attenborough.., that is something special. If a voice-talent can get you that, that is magic. Weaver will get you through the series, and you wouldn&#8217;t complain, you&#8217;d be satisfied, but still its only seven clours, you don&#8217;t discover the &#8216;eight color&#8217;.</p>
<p>I understand why people try so defiantly to defend their poinst-of-view, those who are fans of Ms. Weaver to argue why she&#8217;s better and those who are fans of Sir. Attenborough to argue why he&#8217;s bettter. But if I was responosible for 25 milllion dollars to shoot the series and it was in my hands to choose the better talent, and knowing how difficult everything in filmaking is, how competitive it is, I&#8217;d only settle for the very best, the very, very best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gretchen</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/02/21/sigourney-weaver-to-narrate-planet-earth/comment-page-2/#comment-362749</link>
		<dc:creator>Gretchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=1623#comment-362749</guid>
		<description>My Heavens.  Such bitterness.  Ms. Weaver did an outstanding job.  Her voice was soothing, crisp, clear, and well articulated.  &#039;Twas unmistakeably her.  I was engaged and entertained.  Must we always have something to complain about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Heavens.  Such bitterness.  Ms. Weaver did an outstanding job.  Her voice was soothing, crisp, clear, and well articulated.  &#8216;Twas unmistakeably her.  I was engaged and entertained.  Must we always have something to complain about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/02/21/sigourney-weaver-to-narrate-planet-earth/comment-page-2/#comment-362638</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 04:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=1623#comment-362638</guid>
		<description>I agree with those who made the point that the visual coverage is [and should be] the star of the series.  I think Sigourney did a superb job.  I have not heard the original version, but I suspect it is also very good.  Kudos to ALL who were involved in the production.  Everything about Planet Earth is absolutely stunning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with those who made the point that the visual coverage is [and should be] the star of the series.  I think Sigourney did a superb job.  I have not heard the original version, but I suspect it is also very good.  Kudos to ALL who were involved in the production.  Everything about Planet Earth is absolutely stunning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danny</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/02/21/sigourney-weaver-to-narrate-planet-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-310756</link>
		<dc:creator>danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 04:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=1623#comment-310756</guid>
		<description>The  Attenborough version is really far superior. The idea that a female symbolizes mother nature is ridiculous. it is what it is. nothing symbolizes anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The  Attenborough version is really far superior. The idea that a female symbolizes mother nature is ridiculous. it is what it is. nothing symbolizes anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darin</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/02/21/sigourney-weaver-to-narrate-planet-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-295445</link>
		<dc:creator>Darin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 02:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=1623#comment-295445</guid>
		<description>I thought Weaver did an OK job with the narration, but I was very disappointed with the lightweight approach to science.  After the wealth of information presented in Blue Planet, I was hoping Planet Earth would be in a similar vein.  
This was like the Star Wars prequels compared to the &quot;originals.&quot;  Great special effects, great visuals, but seemed to be aimed at a much younger audience.
I&#039;ll be buying the Attenborough series and I expect to be much happier with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Weaver did an OK job with the narration, but I was very disappointed with the lightweight approach to science.  After the wealth of information presented in Blue Planet, I was hoping Planet Earth would be in a similar vein.<br />
This was like the Star Wars prequels compared to the &#8220;originals.&#8221;  Great special effects, great visuals, but seemed to be aimed at a much younger audience.<br />
I&#8217;ll be buying the Attenborough series and I expect to be much happier with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: javier</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/02/21/sigourney-weaver-to-narrate-planet-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-291074</link>
		<dc:creator>javier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 05:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=1623#comment-291074</guid>
		<description>i&#039;ve heard the new narrator for the BBC Planet Earth and I think Sigourney Weaver is way better</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve heard the new narrator for the BBC Planet Earth and I think Sigourney Weaver is way better</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/02/21/sigourney-weaver-to-narrate-planet-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-291034</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 03:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=1623#comment-291034</guid>
		<description>I can see both sides of the coin here.  I believe that both Weaver and Attenbrough performed brilliantly with this series.  I personally enjoyed Weaver&#039;s narration.  The monotonous feel she evoked allowed the film to tell the real story.  I would also say the change was nice... I suppose I&#039;ve viewed and heard enough documentaries narrated by Attenbrough... it was nice to hear a fresh new voice and it helped to separate this series from older films done by Attenbrough himself.  Attenbrough plays a little too much with his narration which pulled me away from the movie itself.  He&#039;s just too involved... take a seat and let our planet tell the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see both sides of the coin here.  I believe that both Weaver and Attenbrough performed brilliantly with this series.  I personally enjoyed Weaver&#8217;s narration.  The monotonous feel she evoked allowed the film to tell the real story.  I would also say the change was nice&#8230; I suppose I&#8217;ve viewed and heard enough documentaries narrated by Attenbrough&#8230; it was nice to hear a fresh new voice and it helped to separate this series from older films done by Attenbrough himself.  Attenbrough plays a little too much with his narration which pulled me away from the movie itself.  He&#8217;s just too involved&#8230; take a seat and let our planet tell the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/02/21/sigourney-weaver-to-narrate-planet-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-264719</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 04:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=1623#comment-264719</guid>
		<description>I thought Sigourney Weaver did an excellent job, and I understood her flat delivery to be purposeful to keep attention on the video and not the narrator.

And to those that keep going on and on and on about &quot;the Queen&#039;s English&quot;... we don&#039;t have a Queen (thankfully) and I&#039;m not all that interested in having her English pushed on me. How about you take back British English, since apparently you no longer feel a sense of ownership, and then we&#039;ll talk. Ok? Ok.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Sigourney Weaver did an excellent job, and I understood her flat delivery to be purposeful to keep attention on the video and not the narrator.</p>
<p>And to those that keep going on and on and on about &#8220;the Queen&#8217;s English&#8221;&#8230; we don&#8217;t have a Queen (thankfully) and I&#8217;m not all that interested in having her English pushed on me. How about you take back British English, since apparently you no longer feel a sense of ownership, and then we&#8217;ll talk. Ok? Ok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darcy</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/02/21/sigourney-weaver-to-narrate-planet-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-264639</link>
		<dc:creator>Darcy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=1623#comment-264639</guid>
		<description>I rather upset about this! I was just watching planet earth with a female narrator (apparently Sig. Weaver) I have seen the series before and kept thinking that WHAT was being said was different. Well I was F***ing right! If you watch the &quot;Jungles&quot; episode she doesn&#039;t state the actual name of the parisites (that killed the ant) Attenbrough does. There are SEVERAL other places were interesting information was removed and replaced with crap puns! What had been a beutifully shot and highly entertaining show has been dumbed down and its a D*** shame!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rather upset about this! I was just watching planet earth with a female narrator (apparently Sig. Weaver) I have seen the series before and kept thinking that WHAT was being said was different. Well I was F***ing right! If you watch the &#8220;Jungles&#8221; episode she doesn&#8217;t state the actual name of the parisites (that killed the ant) Attenbrough does. There are SEVERAL other places were interesting information was removed and replaced with crap puns! What had been a beutifully shot and highly entertaining show has been dumbed down and its a D*** shame!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
