Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

Angelina Bending Rules In Adoption of Vietnamese Boy?

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

snipshot_cpqj17wie8x.jpgIt seems Angelina Jolie’s star power might be allowing her to bend Vietnamese adoption laws. Last week, the 31-year-old actress filed papers with Vietnamese and US officials to become the child’s guardian as a single parent. However, under Vietnamese law, such circumstances are not allowed. From the article,

“Under Vietnamese law single parents who are co-habiting cannot adopt. International adoption official Tatiana Beams said: “This is a clear contradiction of Vietnamese law, and such situations would not be allowed for other couples. Most co-habiting couples who try to adopt as a single parent are either turned away from agencies or face difficulties.”

Interesting. The US department dealing with the adoption has not opposed Angelina’s actions — even though they say they “abide by Vietnamese rules when it comes to adopting from the country.” Star treatment?

Personally, the rule is a little silly — but adoption from a foreign country is generally a very difficult and time consuming process. There’s obviously some celebrity/money influence going on here. I just find it interesting that Madonna received so much flak for avoiding adoption laws in the African country of Malawi, and now Angelina is apparently doing the same thing. In regards to Madonna, she was quoted as saying, “Personally, I prefer to stay on the right side of the law.” Hmmm….

I wonder if we’ll see her and Brad Pitt tie the knot a lot sooner if this thing blows up?

Like us on Facebook:
0 Comments

Collaborating with animal exploiters won’t help animals

The two sides claim to both have the “health and well-being of animals” in mind in this partnership, but one likely said “after profitability” under their breath.

Exploitation for art is no worse than exploitation for dinner

It always seems to come back to a confused juror deciding when animal use is justified.

Humane Society Serves Pork to Save Dogs…WTF?!

All animals matter morally, equally.