<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rolling Stone&#8217;s Green Issue Rocks On Content, Dulls On Paper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/06/12/rolling-stones-green-issue-rocks-on-content-dulls-on-paper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/06/12/rolling-stones-green-issue-rocks-on-content-dulls-on-paper/</link>
	<description>Causes Entertainment Lifestyle Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green Options</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/06/12/rolling-stones-green-issue-rocks-on-content-dulls-on-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-22659</link>
		<dc:creator>Green Options</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=2820#comment-22659</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Magazine Review: Rolling Stone&#039;s Green Issue...&lt;/strong&gt;

Image Credit: Rolling StoneRolling Stone joins about every other magazine on the planet (score!) by publishing an environmental issue, specifically, a &quot;special report on climate crisis&quot;.  Apparently, that warrants a sleeveless Sting, along wi...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Magazine Review: Rolling Stone&#8217;s Green Issue&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Image Credit: Rolling StoneRolling Stone joins about every other magazine on the planet (score!) by publishing an environmental issue, specifically, a &quot;special report on climate crisis&quot;.  Apparently, that warrants a sleeveless Sting, along wi&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keetsa! Blog - Eco-Friendly and Green &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rolling Stone&#8217;s Green Issue Not So Green</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/06/12/rolling-stones-green-issue-rocks-on-content-dulls-on-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-21612</link>
		<dc:creator>Keetsa! Blog - Eco-Friendly and Green &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rolling Stone&#8217;s Green Issue Not So Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=2820#comment-21612</guid>
		<description>[...] issue on recycled paper because it would diminish the quality of their very important photographs. Ecorazzi thinks this is bull. Do [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] issue on recycled paper because it would diminish the quality of their very important photographs. Ecorazzi thinks this is bull. Do [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/06/12/rolling-stones-green-issue-rocks-on-content-dulls-on-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-21576</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=2820#comment-21576</guid>
		<description>Not using 100%pc recycled stock is a cop-out. A number of trade publications are already stepping out with 100% recycled stock or a significant portion of recycled content. To name a few: Environmental Design + Construction; Metropolis; GreenSource.

These all target the architectural design community, feature beautiful photography, and see it as part of their mission to minimize the environmental impacts of their publications on the environment. Both GreenSource and ED+C publish &quot;eco-audits&quot; describing the savings their paper choices create. ED+C uses New Leaf paper, and GreenSource uses Rolland paper, both 100% pc/pcf papers. One issue of GreenSource, for example, saves 225 mature trees; saves 31,470 pounds of greenhouse emissions; and saves 259 million BTUs of energy and 153,000 gallons of water. And that&#039;s for a relatively small circulation of around 45,000. Imagine the impacts a magazine like Rolling Stone could have by making the commitment to the recycled paper. It&#039;s not just about planting trees to assuage one&#039;s environmental guilt or to greenwash; it&#039;s about figuring out ways to not cut the trees down in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not using 100%pc recycled stock is a cop-out. A number of trade publications are already stepping out with 100% recycled stock or a significant portion of recycled content. To name a few: Environmental Design + Construction; Metropolis; GreenSource.</p>
<p>These all target the architectural design community, feature beautiful photography, and see it as part of their mission to minimize the environmental impacts of their publications on the environment. Both GreenSource and ED+C publish &#8220;eco-audits&#8221; describing the savings their paper choices create. ED+C uses New Leaf paper, and GreenSource uses Rolland paper, both 100% pc/pcf papers. One issue of GreenSource, for example, saves 225 mature trees; saves 31,470 pounds of greenhouse emissions; and saves 259 million BTUs of energy and 153,000 gallons of water. And that&#8217;s for a relatively small circulation of around 45,000. Imagine the impacts a magazine like Rolling Stone could have by making the commitment to the recycled paper. It&#8217;s not just about planting trees to assuage one&#8217;s environmental guilt or to greenwash; it&#8217;s about figuring out ways to not cut the trees down in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Target Green &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8216;Rolling Stone&#8217; - yeas and nays</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/06/12/rolling-stones-green-issue-rocks-on-content-dulls-on-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-21573</link>
		<dc:creator>Target Green &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8216;Rolling Stone&#8217; - yeas and nays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=2820#comment-21573</guid>
		<description>[...] no good deed goes unpunished. Unfortunately, thatâ€™s about as green as the paper gets. The July issue contains absolutely no [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] no good deed goes unpunished. Unfortunately, thatâ€™s about as green as the paper gets. The July issue contains absolutely no [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

