Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

Spielberg May Drop Olympic Position To Push Chinese On Darfur

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

We’re all aware that actions speak louder than words, and director Steven Spielberg may elect to take things a step further than the letter on Darfur he sent Chinese officials earlier this summer. As we’ve heard very little reaction from the Chinese (we’re thinking the Spielberg camp are in the same boat) regarding the note, rumors are swirling that Spielberg may remove himself as artistic adviser to the 2008 Beijing Olympics in protest. China is currently Sudan’s largest customer and their funds are indirectly helping to support the violence there; something several high-profile celebrities are against and would like to see end. From the article,

“‘Steven will make a determination in the next few weeks regarding his work with the Chinese. Our main interest is ending the genocide. No one is clear on the best way to do this,’ Spielberg’s spokesman Andy Spahn told ABCNEWS.com. Spahn said ‘all options were on the table,’ including quitting, but much would depend on an anticipated statement on Sudan by the Chinese government expected in the coming days.”

China is using all its resources to ensure that the 2008 Olympic Games are perfectly staged — an honor the country believes takes precedence over any issue. The last thing they need would be anything that might tarnish that “world coming out” party. Spielberg’s position — and the simple threat of a famous director to walk out on the party — is apparently causing the Chinese to pay attention. If an announcement is due shortly, we’ll keep you updated.

Like us on Facebook:

Veld donates money to farm animals and also serves them

Lest we be confused that their giant V logo stands for anything other than Veld.

Trading beef for beans is not a solution, veganism is

Please do substitute beef for beans, but also have tofu instead of turkey, carrots instead of chicken, and I think you see where I’m going.

Guys, extortion isn’t an effective form of vegan advocacy

Assuming we can extort people into respecting the lives of others makes no sense.