September 25th 2007
PETA Continues Sexy Time Ads With Beauty Maggie Q
Filed under: animals, campaigns — michael @ 8:59 pm
Whoever the marketing director at PETA is, I just want to say “Thank you.” Actress Maggie Q continues to “spice” things up in these latest ads from the animal rights group. Here’s what she had to say about her vegetarian lifestyle, “I feel better, I have more energy on and off the set, and I have the satisfaction of knowing that I’m doing something to help stop animal suffering.” To donate to PETA Asia-Pacific, please click here.






peta kills animals because they would rather spend the money that would save them on other things.
probably stuff like this.
What is it with celebs all saying the same thing, when it comes to being a veggie, “Energy, Energy, Energy”. I know that its an easy way to explain being or going veggie, but come on. Alicia Silverstone recently made a video where she pretty much said the exact same thing as Susie Q.
Being a veggie is about so more much than having “more energy”. How about better cholesterol, or less fat, maybe you’re against hormones injected into cows, or how about cause you dont want to support the ugliness that goes on within the meat industry, not too mention those ghastly slaughterhouses. I could go on.
or duh, because its great for the environment.
Sexy…Nice, even as a woman I can enjoy these ads. Now what I want to see is some males doing these ads!
[…] [Ecorazzi] actors, animals, animal rights group, campaigns, Celebrity, celebs, earth friendly, hottie, peta, […]
Again a sublime, astonishing ad by PETA! I love this animal rights organization!!!
Maggie’s a very cute 28 year old — however, her movie credits include Mission Impossible III and Die Hard IV.
The former I would never watch.
The later I thought was one of the best computer-terror movies ever.
However, one certainly has to wonder how many BTU’s of energy were expended by the blockbusters, how much CO2 was released making the explosions and how many consumer goods were created — which at least used up precious resources and at worse may have involved killing a few wild beasts to make them.
Once again, Hollywood sells its hypocrisy with some very nice T & A.
I believe PETA does more to raise the awareness of the average person about the continued plight of animals and their welfare than any other organization. Support them with you donations and time whenever possible.
[…] PETA Continues Sexy Time Ads With Beauty Maggie Q […]
[…] Black, a wildly popular Australian actress, has joined Maggie Q in adorning her beautiful body with veggies and promoting the vegetarian lifestyle in a new ad for […]
[…] begin! We’ve seen more celebrity ladies lately drop their clothing to support various causes (Maggie Q, Sophie Monk, Alicia Silverstone, Pippa Black) and the response has ranged from supportive to the […]
PETA continues to be the leader in mass media education. Excellent ads — love them!!!
Right On Maggie!
You rock. I applaud you for all the work that you do on behalf of animals, and that you are a prime example for all other celebrities to follow. Keep up the great work.
And what a hot bod you have!
Maggie Q - HOT!
PETA - Idiots with too much time on their hands
dear econazzi, for every animal you don’t eat, i am going to eat four. thanks
Replacing the domination and oppression of animals with the domination and oppression of woman. So you don’t feel like a “pussy” for going vegan.
Classic PETA
As they say, “Any publicity is good publicity” and those ads certainly attract attention. To leverage that attention to try to influence people is a smart move. I personally think electronic vehicle technology is more of a priority than animal relations however.
Peta use womens bodies a lot don’t they? There is a conspicuous lack of mens bodies being used.
I know that there are more female veggies than males (though I think that the numbers might be closer with vegans -not sure) - maybe they see this as a way of getting the attention of more young men.
I do not like Peta’s tactics - I think that attention grabbing stuff like this, or shock tactics like the naked woman in a pig crate in Covent Garden is shortlived, and alienates as many people as it ‘wins over’.
I became a vegetarian at 16 with absolutely no influence from anyone else. I do agree with spreading the message, but I prefer other methods.
Who cares, the end justifies the means. So long as PETA can continue their work against unethical treatment of animals, they have my vote.
Listen to the utter drivel that is spouted here…
“peta kills animals…..blah blah etc”
“A conspicious lack of mens bodies…”
“The oppression and domination of women…”
“I dont like PETA’s tactics….”
“I think electric vehicle technology is more of a priority…”
“Replacing the domination and oppression of animals with the domination and oppression of woman. So you don’t feel like a “pussy” for going vegan.
Classic PETA”
Amen!
Thank you, jenni and caroline. This ad doesn’t say anything about animals, and it doesn’t even promote veganism. PETA panders to the mainstream while animals continue to be thought of as objects for our consumption… kinda like Maggie Q here.
Fortunately, it’s obvious that Aminal is the one spouting drivel. “The ends justify the means” has been the justification for some of the greatest atrocities ever, not to mention the very oppression that PETA is supposedly against.
I accidentally hit a possum the other day. Would I be convicted of man slaughter. I stopped to render aid, but it was too late. Poor thing. We called animal control to dispose of it. Seriously though, if PETA had it’s way, would I be convicted of vehicular manslaughter? And on the flip side, if one of them rips through my trash and pulls it out all over the lawn, can I sue the possums for vandalizing my lawn?
On another, but similar topic, I heard that being vegan is very healthy, but the research indicating that soy products could contain natural neuro-toxins does scare me off from eating soy.
Also, I barely even noticed these ads popping up because we see so many mostly naked women in ads today, that I’ve become somewhat numbed by them.
Well, if you really want to end animal suffering, I’d say eat more meat. The more you eat, the more they have to kill, the more they have to kill, the faster they have to kill them, the faster they have to kill them, the quicker (painless..-er) they die. Irregardless of the pain death makes, if they die faster, it ends the suffering faster.
On another note, plants are living creatures too. They breed, are born, grow old, feel pain, bleed, and die. In fact, most plants need to still be alive when you eat them in order to get the most nutrients out of them. Think about the massacre your next salad is.
Also, every cell in your body, and especially your brain and spinal column, requires a vitamin called B-12. No B-12 equals severe brain and spinal problems, and increased mortality rate. Sure, there are B-12 supplements out there, and soy and red beans are good sources, but you need to have blood tests done to figure out how much B-12 your body needs specifically. In short, it’s easier to just eat the little doods who are bred to be eated.
Besides, biblically, eating was refered to as ’sitting down to meat.’
Chew on that.