<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Apple iPhone: Not So Green</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/10/17/the-apple-iphone-not-so-green/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/10/17/the-apple-iphone-not-so-green/</link>
	<description>Causes Entertainment Lifestyle Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wheywood</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/10/17/the-apple-iphone-not-so-green/comment-page-1/#comment-54497</link>
		<dc:creator>wheywood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 04:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=4179#comment-54497</guid>
		<description>luv mac stuff, even have a dotmac account for my email. but i&#039;m not going to buy an iPhone, even though I desperately want one.

I posted on Apple&#039;s support pages, &quot;I&#039;m going to be mean until iPhone is green&quot;. Basically putting a link to the Greenpeace test and asking what users thought. I was very disappointed when Apple deleted my post.

It does feel like a greenwash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>luv mac stuff, even have a dotmac account for my email. but i&#8217;m not going to buy an iPhone, even though I desperately want one.</p>
<p>I posted on Apple&#8217;s support pages, &#8220;I&#8217;m going to be mean until iPhone is green&#8221;. Basically putting a link to the Greenpeace test and asking what users thought. I was very disappointed when Apple deleted my post.</p>
<p>It does feel like a greenwash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/10/17/the-apple-iphone-not-so-green/comment-page-1/#comment-42069</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 05:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=4179#comment-42069</guid>
		<description>Apple has never been a great environmental company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple has never been a great environmental company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allie&#8217;s Answers &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What&#8217;s Going On</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/10/17/the-apple-iphone-not-so-green/comment-page-1/#comment-41897</link>
		<dc:creator>Allie&#8217;s Answers &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What&#8217;s Going On</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 13:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=4179#comment-41897</guid>
		<description>[...] The iPhone is a lot of things. Unfortunately, eco-friendly isn&#8217;t one of them. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The iPhone is a lot of things. Unfortunately, eco-friendly isn&#8217;t one of them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete W</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2007/10/17/the-apple-iphone-not-so-green/comment-page-1/#comment-41739</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=4179#comment-41739</guid>
		<description>Umm.... So what?  Greenpeace targeted Apple because they&#039;re a high-profile target.

Don&#039;t believe everything you hear just because it comes from a group that claims to care about the environment.

http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2007/10/16/greenpeace_vs_apple/

The PVC in the iPhone is in the freakin&#039; headphones, and the 1.5% by weight was the weight of the headphones!  1.5% of a few grams is hardly the environmental catastrophe GP wants you to think it is.

As for the video:

Nokia has all their mobile PVC free.  (Does that statement include the headset?)  iPhone is PVC free as well, except for the included headphones.

&quot;Both removed SOME OF their worst chemicals...&quot;  So they haven&#039;t removed ALL of them?  Shame on SonyEriccson and Motorola!  I&#039;m sure Greenpeace will get right on making videos to shame them, just as soon as they&#039;re done cooking up new things to hype about Apple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm&#8230;. So what?  Greenpeace targeted Apple because they&#8217;re a high-profile target.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t believe everything you hear just because it comes from a group that claims to care about the environment.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2007/10/16/greenpeace_vs_apple/" rel="nofollow">http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2007/10/16/greenpeace_vs_apple/</a></p>
<p>The PVC in the iPhone is in the freakin&#8217; headphones, and the 1.5% by weight was the weight of the headphones!  1.5% of a few grams is hardly the environmental catastrophe GP wants you to think it is.</p>
<p>As for the video:</p>
<p>Nokia has all their mobile PVC free.  (Does that statement include the headset?)  iPhone is PVC free as well, except for the included headphones.</p>
<p>&#8220;Both removed SOME OF their worst chemicals&#8230;&#8221;  So they haven&#8217;t removed ALL of them?  Shame on SonyEriccson and Motorola!  I&#8217;m sure Greenpeace will get right on making videos to shame them, just as soon as they&#8217;re done cooking up new things to hype about Apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

