This site and this article is a joke.

ENVIRONMENTALISM IS RECYCLED COMMUNISM AND NAZISM (And You’re Supporting It)

Here’s the essential common core of hatred and destruction in the doctrines of Communism, Nazism, and Environmentalism. Only the concretes differ, not the fundamental principle of hatred for human life and happiness.

Communism: The pursuit of individual self-interest causes monopolies, depressions, and exploitation of workers by capitalists. It must be replaced by self-sacrifice for the benefit of the working class and the Socialist State. Capitalists and landowners must be exterminated for the benefit of the proletariat.

Nazism: The pursuit of individual self-interest causes racial impurity, national decline, and exploitation of German workers by Jewish capitalists. It must be replaced by self-sacrifice for the good of the Aryan master race and the National Socialist State. Jews, Gypsies, and Slavs must be exterminated for the benefit of the German Nation.

Environmentalism: The pursuit of individual self-interest causes global warming, acid rain, and ozone depletion. It must be replaced by self-sacrifice for the good of other species—our “fellow biota”—and for the good of the planet, under the auspices of international treaties and a nascent Global Socialist State: the UN. Most of the human race must be exterminated for the benefit of exploited species and the planet. (This is what the environmentalist “extremists” already openly say. The “moderates” merely want to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 90 percent and thereby reduce the American standard of living to that of a third world country, with a third world country’s infant mortality and life expectancy.)
SAY NO TO RECYCLED COMMUNISM AND NAZISM. SAY NO TO ENVIRONMENTALISM.

we want to exterminate most of the species, yet also reduce the american standard of living to third world status, so the americans get to stay? i think they should be the first to go. please stop washing your brain, its a terrible waste of water.

Why not sue? Insurance companies, and city building codes are making us pay more based on the Global Warming theory.

We pay tons of our money in taxes supporting Global Warming organizations, and research. For what?

In 1998, Al Gore said within 10 years our climate will see dramatic change. Ice Caps will melt and take away our coastlines, Fierce Hurricanes will destroy Miami, New York City, and Houston. Mild Winters will create major droughts in parts of the Midwest.

Last I checked, the coastal cities are still here. The last two years were the lowest Hurricanes on record. Snowcover in the Midwest is at its highest levels since 1966. It recently snowed in Baghdad, and parts of South Africa. Maybe ask people in Brazil if Global Warming exists. Parts of Brazil’s rain forests FROZE and killed several hundred people. China and Russia are seeing one of the coldest Winters on record. True the Pacific Ocean Waters have warmed 1/2 of a degree in the past 70 years.. BUT this year the average pacific ocean temperature has cooled 3 degrees in the past 6 months. Glaciers have thawed in parts of Greenland and actually grown vegetation.. BUT.. THE Glacier has came back in and in only 6 months.

Al Gore was invited to this event as were Dr. James Hansen and Dr. Gavin Schmidt, three of the biggest proponents of the global warming hoax. All were even offered their normal speaking fee(Al Gore’s is $200,000!). All refused to show up. Why not show up and back up all your claims with your “science” to prove global warming? Because it doesn’t exist.

Global Warming is just the belief system for people who don’t want to believe in God to believe in something larger than themselves.

Besides, I believe it was the June 24, 1974 issue of Time Magazine that contained the story warning us of the dangers of Global Cooling! My how we’ve changed in 34 years!

Make no mistake, global warming IS an elaborate hoax, but those who push it’s goal is not a greener America, it’s the Carbon Tax. It’s just another way to punish unequal prosperity. It’s the reason I never want to become a multi-millionaire, I’d get taxed to death by the Democraticly controlled government. Where’s the incentive?

Don’t you just love how (and this applies to ALL matters) when liberals don’t have a response to an intelligent inquiry, they just start yelling, “Loser! Crazy!”… When did this country become one big playground at recess?

Exactly Jen. Hey earth, are you saying we shouldn’t look at the argument from both sides of the picture? Are we just to believe because Al Gore made a case for it in a movie? Based on that logic, I bet you think the Ark of the Covenant is in a wharehouse being looked at by “top men” too, right?!

Remember, general term changed from “global warming” to “climate change” as the global warming argument couldn’t be sustained. Science has clarly shown that changes have been occuring and that is difficult to debate against. The real issue is what is causing the changes. is it human CO2, natural Earth cycles or solar activity (which has been a way up over the last 20 years) or a combination of these and other items. This is still a legitimate debate that needs to be done with ALL of the science. To say otherwise makes you lose any credibility as now you are part of the “LW blind followers” which is polar opposite to “RW losers”. Either place is intellectually fraught with peril.

“It’s the reason I never want to become a multi-millionaire, I’d get taxed to death by the Democraticly controlled government.”

Yea, ok.

If given the option, I think I’ll take my chances while you stay up all night thinking we’re going to “revert to a third world economy”, live in hobbit holes, and all suffer horribly under a carbon tax.

Give me a break — all these idiots making this issue a partisan one (liberals eek! left vs. right) are missing the big picture. For our sake, I hope Global Warming turns out to be a massive mistake. The consequences are so great that we would be wise to invest resources in renewable sources of energy, green building, and sustainability. If this all turns out not to be true, we’ll still be left with a better world than the one we have now.

The rest of you worried about a democratically-controlled government have obviously been living in a cave the past seven years with a Republican-controlled government that’s done more to hurt civil liberties and subvert the constitution than any other administration before it.

So bring on the threat of global warming — true or not, it has gotten us thinking more about our relationship with the planet and how our impact drastically alters all around us. A beautiful wake-up call that may just save the asses of generations yet to come.

You people don’t all vote…..do you?

“The rest of you worried about a democratically-controlled government have obviously been living in a cave the past seven years with a Republican-controlled government that’s done more to hurt civil liberties and subvert the constitution than any other administration before it.”

Sorry, but FDR used the Constitution for toilet paper many years ago and no one has respected it since.

Reading thru these comments, all I notice is the same thing I hear between all skeptics and supporters of global warming (oops, climate change – since 2007 was the coolest year in a long while and we are in a 10 year cooling trend, we are probably about to revert to the 70′s “global cooling” so Al Gore can stay relevant and in a job) the skeptics offer all the facts and scientific evidence while the supporters treat it like a religion – “you better believe or you are going to BURN!!”
Living in western New York, I know all about the REAL dangers of environmental devastation. The remnants of the Manhattan Project and the industry that fueled WWII are buried all around this area and continue to make large areas of land unlivable – not to mention the incredibly high rates of cancer and other diseases.
If you want to sit back and make yourself feel good watching Gore’s propaganda and driving your prius (what are you going to do with that mercury laden battery when you are done with it?) go ahead. But if you want to actually make a real difference, get the government to fund the Superfund programs – or better yet, get a hazmat suit and a shovel.

Global warming is a political term for the negative effects of man on his environment, the bottom line is man DOES pollute, I dont care if its 150 degrees or -40, you must have clean air and water. Do you sceptics argue there is no pollution? perhaps these treaties and agreements have shortcomings but a start is a start. Fix the shortcomings but not the principal. If you didnt have to take credit for it would you be more apt to try to curb the problem?

Sign me up! Global warming is a fraud, and fraud is illegal. I just wish that people who buy into such crap would just realize that honesty doesn’t mean anyone is trying to kill your kitten. Get out of your car in NY and take a deep breath, now go to any other country and do the same in one of their cities. WE ARE NOT THE PROBLEM! America has done great things to keep our environment clean. Places like Mexico China and India do not even require catalytic converters on their cars. There are many easy available environmental fixes that can be acheieved in foreign nations. So maybe the extremists could get some plane tickets and go do something real and important somewhere else. But please stop using your paranoia to perpetrate fraud on America

Libertarian 12 where do you get your info?
2007 Was Tied As Earth’s Second Warmest Year, ScienceDaily (Jan. 17, 2008)but disregard those darn “scientists”. They don’t know nothin. They came up with the junk science that cancer causes cigarettes.

My dad died of cancer while they were trying to disprove that theory.

Ounce of prevention worth a pound of cure. Hopefully we wont NEED to disprove this one.

Yes, George Reisman has a PhD… in ECONOMICS. His opinions on global warming would be worthless, but I have great doubt that the 70 y/o Reisman is sitting around trolling the internet looking for articles — on global warming or anything — to laughably attempt to fecally-smear with such oxymorons as something being Nazism and Communism, belief-systems which are at opposing ends of the spectrum, not to mention that his definitions of each are wrong as well as racist. That being said, anybody can get a PhD. It means you’ve completed a certainly level of study (in a particular field) successfully; it doesn’t neccessarily mean you’re intelligent.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Reisman

Have some fun and go to Reisman’s website or blog and contact him about whether he’s the author of that post. Then we can all have a good laugh at who actually does get sued for fraud.

Now as to Coleman, he’s much the same as our little pretend Reisman. Note for first that he says somebody should sue Gore et al for fraud, not that he’s saying he’s going to pony up the money and do it himself, certainly because he knows that it wouldn’t go anywhere and he’d be laughed at even harder than he is now for suggesting. Part of that reason is that he acknowledges global warming exists, he just says it’s part of a natural occurance, cyclical patterns. Okay, well, disease is a natural occurance, as is drought, and periods of mass extinction; should those things be ignored as well, because it’s “not my fault”?

Liberal herbivorous dinosaur: “OMG! Rex! Look at that huge rock in the sky! We should take some sort of action before it hits us!”

Conservative carnivorous dinosaur: “You gawddammed CommuNazinviromentalist alarmist fraud! That’s nothing to worry about; none of us put it there. It’s completely natural.”

Still, the terms used are the political terms for our effect on the environment,Embedded into our minds as political terms by Al Gore and even his counterpart George, so they can find ways to scam assholes like you and me. Thats their bus, they are political corporate bastards. They really dont care if the air is dirty, or if your water is unclean, most freshwater fish in lake erie are only reccomended to be consumed once a month or less to be safe. Maybe cant breathe at the Olympics this year.
All of this is well and fine why dont we just overpoliticize aids, cancer and everyfnthing else and just lay down and die.
Stick your mouth on a tailpipe and multiply by 200 million, I suppose it just dissolves.

Oh yeah, and I almost forgot to mention; I found a small tear in the time/space continuum in my basement. I am convinced by some of my testing that a massive coating of Platinum can seal it up. Please send as much as you can afford to me. If you donate $200,000.00 to my “keep us in 3-d” fund, I will send you some charts and data.

It may be nothing, but do you really want to take that chance?

So lets all switch to fluorescent bulbs so we can pack in another million Chinese or Indian familys into Canada. How many fluorescent bulbs to offset a family of 5. This War cant be won and resourses should not be squandered on useless left wing political relevance.
Lets take honest stock of what/who we are, work with what we have towards a bright future for all…enviroment included. Stop running in two directions at once, take off the horse blinders and loose the idiots with the Megaphones and we can (left and right) work together for OUR future.

We sure had fun in the 9 inches of snow to hit Texas. Would you like to see how much fun Texans had with sleds, snowmen and snowballs? I have pictures. Oh, Boy, that sure was some warming.

Global warming is due to solar activity not human actions. Don’t mean to burst everyones bubble, very sorry. More power to Mr. Gore for tricking all of you into watching his movie and awarding him the Nobel prize.

What retard wrote this article? Have they been living in a cave for the last 6 months. Coldest winter on record,it must be caused by all the carbon dioxide blocking the sun light.

I say go for it because he is not telling the truth any way and we all know it if we do any looking on the net at all! It is caused by h a a r p s and c e m r t a i l s . I hope this time you let this post and not say I am cursing lol I have never cursed in my life.

Seems like the Flat Earth Society is still alive and well and taking drugs supplied in the Koolaid doled out by Glen Beck & RU$H Limbaugh…what is it Oxycontin or Fentanyl? We could be up to our necks in water and these supporters of Exxon-Mobil and CEI would still be denying global warming exists…THAT is why they would continue to pay $3 dollars a gallon for fuel to countries that openly give this money to extremists in funds to keep attacking this nation aka 9/11…RU$H Limbaugh says WE can’t innovate our way out of it and I say BULL! So let’s let McCaine attack Iran with nukes and end it all now! Why wait? For Islamist Extremists to fly over here on OUR planes to KILL us? All Coleman is ‘mad’ about is he didn’t CASH in on ‘global warming’ when it first came to light! You can’t ALL deny it forever just because you HATE Al Gore! By the WAY…Al looooves chocolate! Maybe you should storm Hershey’s plant in PA and shut them down for making that chocolate just because you HATE Al Gore! Hypocrites!

The fact of the matter is no one knows why the earth is warming up. However, we do know two things. One, human kind pollutes and destroys the earth every minute of everyday and second that the earth goes through natural warming and cooling cycles all the time.
In fact, the earth is due to get warm because of the wobble in the earth’s axis which is now moving a 1/2 closer to the sun causing the earth to get warmer.
the end.

How stupid can people be, have we forgotten “Y2K”, and the Al Gore’s of the “Y2K” fiasco? To the people out there who are looking for a new “Y2K” grab on and hold tight “global worming” is for you. Just remember in the end your name will be added along with Al Gore to the stupidity list.

We were told daily by the “news media” and the “computer geniuses” how airplanes would be falling from the sky, the power grids would shut down, no food would be delivered to the stores causing mass starvation and water treatment plants would stop functioning.

At the same time there was another group of people who weren’t getting any air time. It was another group of computer scientists who didn’t have an agenda, books, or stories to sell. They disagreed and were ignored. Their news didn’t sell or fill air time.

Those of you who are old enough will remember the stupidity of the people who were making a living promoting this Y2K nonsense. Now we have people like Al Gore. And once again, the sky is falling, the sky is falling.

Good for you John Coleman I hope you proceed.

“Seems like the Flat Earth Society is still alive and well and taking drugs supplied in the Koolaid doled out by Glen Beck & RU$H Limbaugh…what is it Oxycontin or Fentanyl?”

Well, ooks like the lefties are out of ideas and proof, so let the name calling begin!

Isn’t it more of a “flat earth” idea to deny that the world was once under ice and, without global warming, still would be? Accept the truth that the earth has always warmed and cooled and let’s fix the problems we have control over; like clean coal technology and wind and solar technologies. This would fix so many problems, but unfortunately, Al can’t find a way to cash in on this without creating hysteria!

Here is a very good film explaining the science behind the opposing views on global warming I think that if you have any interest you should check this out so you have the whole story.

Sorry I wasn’t able to embed the video but these are the URLs for each part of the video.
—–
You can watch the whole video here:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3928695593212006635&q=global+warming+swindle+site%3Avideo.google.com&total=29&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=1
I suggest you watch it, especially if you believe everything Al Gore says.

I agree with all the other intelligent people above me. I’ll start by saying I’m a GW skeptic, but not on basis of belief.

I do not believe that man pollutes the earth: I know it. My belief is that we aren’t polluting as much as Al Gore’d-in-the-head-at-birth says we are. Last October, a British court found 11 specific scientific falsehoods in “An Inconvenient Truth”, and thus labeled it a propaganda film.

AND THE MAN WON A NOBEL PRIZE?!?!?!?!? – I almost killed myself that day.

I don’t believe Climate Change is not anthropogenic. I know it is not – mostly. I’m not saying we have zero impact, just very little. Moreover, we can’t (and thus shouldn’t) do anything to “fix” Climate Change. Carbon laws, and more than half the Kyoto Agreement, are the biggest ineffectual wastes of money EVER in the history of mankind. There really isn’t room for rational opinion on this matter – Kyoto and carbon laws are purely political, based only loosely on scientific fact.

I do not believe that we should make strides to ‘clean’ our industrial tech and reduce our dependence on fossil fuels. I know that we should (‘we’ being all humans, not just the western world). The extent at which we should is where belief comes into play, since there’s very little we can do to predict what the best course of action is.

I do not believe that John Coleman has a sound basis for a lawsuit against Al Gore and his cohorts. I know it. Regardless of the science behind GW, Gore is responsible (proudly) for influencing the passage of carbon laws and such. After these laws were passed, he proceeded to set up the carbon credits market and profit hugely from it. He indoctrinated a belief and profited from exploiting the actions of others based on that belief – this is one of the definitions of fraud. My belief, however, is that he should be shot and killed immediately after he confesses his sins of irrationality. On public television. (OK maybe that’s a bit much, but you get the idea)

This should be apparent: Al Gore (who is simply a real-world figurehead for environmentalism) is a man who deals with feelings, not logic. People who aren’t good at getting people to agree with them with charisma alone aren’t in political office.

Some matters should be political (hot topics in the US like abortion, gay rights, economics) because the way people FEEL determines what happens – there is no concrete right or wrong answer for everyone.

Climate Change, however (I’m capitalizing so not to offend anyone), poses questions that have concrete answers (some of them, others not) – one of them is that Climate Change is not anthropogenic, but instead very largely the product of natural cycles.

Also, CO2 is the 3rd or 4th most important “greenhouse gas” in our atmosphere, after WATER (compare a desert to a rain forest – this is easy) and METHANE, and perhaps another but it escapes me for now. Just an FYI for you “leftards” (no offense to rational people who vote liberal).

There’s nothing new in the knowledge that human society has the attention span of a flea. The cliche “15 minutes of fame” comes to mind. Sci-Fi authors aplenty have criticized that attention span by claiming that we will never be able to leave our solar system – it takes too long. Somebody made the point about Y2K (intelligent people were refuting that stuff from day 0). Heck, most of us have forgotten already that a young celebrity died not to long ago – even me.

As such there are three kinds of people: people who are oblivious to this fact (most people), people that exploit this fact (business owners/leaders, politicians, news network programmers), and people who are aware of it and despise it, but realize there’s nothing that can be done to change it (philosophers, scientists, people whose thinking is dominated by rationality rather than passion).

Somebody pointed out the “Global Cooling Scare” of the mid 70s. Margaret Thatcher turned that one around with some legislation intended to boost nuclear plant construction in the UK. These legal actions were underlaid with conjectures that carbon dioxide – a chief product of coal combustion – is damaging to our environment.

Personally, I think she’d have changed her exact arguments if she knew what the outcome would be – she “got the ball rolling” unknowingly on GW, just like Charlie Thompson unwittingly contributed to the current disarrayed state of the Middle East – most specifically the number guns and RPG launchers that angry Arabs have to shoot at invaders.

I don’t look down on either of these people – their intentions were good. In fact, Al Gore may have one day been the same. He just got greedy for attention, and then money. (Don’t blame the man – he’s smarter than lots of people, but he counts on the folly of human nature to make money, and that pisses me off)

I thought wow what a horrible article, then I saw what the website was, ha.

Actually the Prius battery does not contain mercury. The Ni-Mh battery used in Prius is much more environmental friendly. Nickel and Metal Hydride are not heavy metals or toxic.

Wow i didn’t actually believe that a lot of americans think global warming doesn’t exist until i saw all these comments.
americans must be really smart to know better than the rest of the world who accept it as fact and are wasting their time trying to save the planet.
i’ve been brainwashed into recycling and everything. now we need to figure what the fraudsters do with all that seperated glass. oh i’ve figured it out! it’s a big terrorist plot they’re turning it in to WMDs. quick get a move on and bomb them…

Some really smart people don’t believe in global warming. Other really smart people do. Mr. Coleman isn’t in either camp.

Mr. Coleman equates global warming with climate change (see page 2 “Global Warming i.e. Climate Change”) and attempts to debunk both with his position paper. They aren’t the same. Global warming is one theory (yes, I believe the verdict is still out, but that drastic change is a real possibility) of the outcome of Climate Change. Mr. Coleman ignorantly states that they are the same.

Even his source for primary authority, which he points to ad naseum in his “briefs”, completely disagrees with him on this point. In fact, http://www.icecap.us expressly states: “We worry the sole focus on greenhouse gases and the unwise reliance on imperfect climate models while ignoring real data may leave civilization unprepared for a sudden climate shift that history tells us will occur again, very possibly soon. ”

I love how Mr. Coleman state’s that he has “studied” the issue. He’s a weatherman, not a climatologist. Even if he does have advanced training in meteorology (I can’t find any info about his educational background, but I’m sure he’d tout it, if it helped him), to suggest, as he does expressly, that meteorology is the study of climate change (on page 2 of his position paper) demonstrates a fundamental lack of understanding (or blatant misrepresentation) of the disciplines.

By definition, Meteorology is the study of weather process and forecasting over the short term. Climatology is the study of climate over the long-term. His piece is intellectually dishonest and it discredits his whole position.

Sure, meteorologist have something to say about the issues. They can be smart people who can contribute to the process. Yet, Mr. Coleman denigrates Meteorologists with PhDs (page 2) as likely single-minded. Apparently, only meteorologists who are weather forecasters and agree with Mr. Coleman’s views are truly capable of telling us what’s what regarding long-term climate change.

Another glaring example of his intellectual dishonesty is the statement “CO2 is not a pollutant” on page 7 and 9. Mr. Coleman intimates that it is not a pollutant simply because CO2 occurs naturally in the environment. Mr. Coleman argues that CO2 is also not a pollutant b/c plants need it to grow, and plants do better when they have more. He undermines his credibility by making such simplistic and ridiculous statements such as this.

The American Heritage Science Dictionary defines “pollutant” as “A substance or condition that contaminates air, water, or soil. Pollutants can be artificial substances, such as pesticides and PCBs, or naturally occurring substances, such as oil or carbon dioxide, that occur in harmful concentrations in a given environment…”. In my environmental studies education, I learned the definition a little more bluntly: shit can be good and it can be bad. It just depends on what you do with it, how you do what you do with it, and when you do it.

Understanding these issues is not the sole domain of scientists. Yet, to be arrogant, if not dishonest, about your authority and understanding of the issues is to undermine the credibility of your position. And you open yourself up to being ignored and discredited as Mr. Coleman surely should be.

I’ll listen to opposing views, but don’t insult my intelligence by parading out a T.V. Weatherman who has the chutzpah to suggest he is among the intellectual elite, by simply equating a career in meteorology with the discipline of climatology; who thinks that nothing that occurs naturally can be a pollutant; and who believes that climate change and global warming are equivalent and neither are real (despite his own primary source authority expressely disagreeing with him).

Moreover, most everybody excepts the “precautionary principle” as applied in the medical profession. Would’t it be wise to adopt the same principle when environmental health is at stake? I truly hope Mr. Coleman can flash those pearly whites and say “I told you so.” The stakes are too high for him to be wrong on the ultimate issue and for us to not have acted to address the threat.

The tragic truth about all of this, is we won’t know who was “right” and who was “wrong” until it is likely to late to avoid much of the impacts. I suggest we proceed to understand as much as we can and act in accordance with the precautionary principle. We can start by first making sure we put Mr. Coleman’s 40 pages of “briefs” in the proper place, the recycling bin.

well, what about this? the semi goes by, the smoke gets too close to you and you cough. you stand on the cliffs near lake erie and you see the beautiful GREEN water down below. two of the countless examples of the destruction of the environment. and you people say that there is no such thing as global warming. who cares if its real or fake. look at what is being done on its behalf. both sides. i will allow you all to argue the negative of this, but are you really implying that its all bad? what, we dont need a more efficient fuel source? wait, we dont need to clean our water supply?

gore leaves a lot to be desired and this site is a joke. here’s something you’ll hate. i just bought a new suburban and love it. do i need it? no, but it does come in handy sometimes. how’s my gas mileage? terrible. why would i buy such a big suv? ’cause I wanted it and i can afford it after years of struggling to get where i’m at. i have a tv in every bedroom too and sometimes they’re all on at the same time. i like to leave the lights on and never use flourescent bulbs. i keep the house at 68 in the summer and 74 in the winter. i’ll continue living like this regardless. green technology is great and i’d love to see it, but don’t ask me to change my habits because i never will