Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

Clooney Puts Pressure On Omega Watches Over Olympic Sponsorship

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi


If Chinese officials were hoping Steven Spielberg’s Olympic dis over Darfur would quickly blow over, George Clooney is here to remind them that they should get used to the criticism. Much to the chagrin of Beijing, Clooney is back in the media criticizing China’s involvement in resolving the crisis. Meanwhile, he’s also simultaneously applying pressure to a major Olympics global sponsor, Omega Watches. In an article on the BBC today, Clooney said “I have talked with Omega (about China) for over a year and will continue to talk to Omega. I have and will go to the places I and China do business and ask for help.”

Clooney enjoys a good relationship with Omega, having promoted the brand for several years now. Most recently, he joined an advisory board to help the watchmaker enter the fuel cell industry.

For their part, Omega respects Clooney’s passionate activism, but prefers to express its moral engagements through contracts and behind closed doors. From the article,

“‘We have full respect for his strong engagement in the fight for the good cause and share his opinion, especially concerning Darfur, and we are proud to work with a person who has such high ethical views,’ said Swatch chief executive Nick Hayek. ‘It is our policy not to get involved in politics because it would not serve the cause of the sport which is one most noble human endeavors for creating understanding and peace all over the world.’ Hayek said Omega would address China’s association with Sudan through direct high-level contacts rather than publicly. ‘Of course, it is a continuous process but we do it the Swiss way of ‘little strokes fell great oaks,’ Hayek said.”

Like us on Facebook:

Concerned about endangered animals? Stop eating them

Methods of animal conservation that support the exploitation of animals don’t exist for the animals, they exist for human profit.

Why we SHOULDN’T genetically ‘disenhance’ animals

Creating bandaid “solutions” to ethical problems we’ve created doesn’t address the issue at hand

What you can do if live exports disturb you

The outcry should go further than importation and should be directed at the fact that the animals in question were on their way to slaughter in the first place.