Comments on: Nancy Pelosi And Newt Gingrich Come Together To Fight Climate Change

By: Brent

Brent — Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:38:00 +0000

Wow, now even Newt’s joining the bandwagon. I am beginning to believe these are no intelligent politicians left in the world. As a scientist myself, I know the “evidence” for man-made climate change is bunk and no number of stupid politicians or commercial indoctrination will change the facts.

By: Mike

Mike — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:45:34 +0000

For a more recent list of people who have publicly come out against global warming, and their statement to that effect, go here: Here As an aside, the following article about moose CO2 emissions in Norway paints the picture far more humurously than satire ever could: Here I love how the hunters have sprung on this chance to increase the hunting quotas - "oh yes, we are very concerned about the effect of moose farts on our planet. Please allow us to take care of this problem by hunting more."

By: Mike

Mike — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:11:10 +0000

“19,000 scientists come out recently in the National Review” Recently? Only if 1998 is recent. And not the National Review.

19,000 scientists doubt warming? I doubt that.

http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/local/bay_environment/blog/2008/02/19000_scientists_doubt_warming.html

By: John Samples

John Samples — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 05:40:52 +0000

Makes me want to puke!!!!!! We’re compromising our way of life for an unproven theory which algore won’t even debate. The ingnorant puplic is falling for this nonsense while the dolt is making millions instigating this hysteria. Why won’t people listen to the 400+ scientists who wrote debunking man-caused climate change or the facts that point toward the earth actually leveling off or cooling in the last 10 years?

By: Doug Lofland

Doug Lofland — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 05:12:39 +0000

So what am I missing.

19,000 scientists come out recently in the National Review with a petition against the idea of man-made climate change, and against a repeat of Kyoto, and still the conventional wisdom maintains that there is a so-called consensus of “reputable” scientists in favor of the idea of anthropogenic climate change?

Is this the Twilight Zone or what?

I know what the next line of attack will be…..this is just another conspiracy by the oil companies, but come on…..19,000 scientists, all funded by the oil companies????

Good Grief, even Galileo faced greater logic!

By: Remy Chevalier

Remy Chevalier — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:59:11 +0000

What happened to “Global Warming?
Why is everyone calling it “Climate Change” now?
Is the planet heating up or cooling, or just behaving weird, temper tantrums and extremes?
How about we get back to what started it all to begin with… all the crap we’re throwing into the environment, the air, the land, the sea… all the poisons… that’s the real issue here. The climate is one thing, the toxicity of the environment is another… less bees, less birds, less frogs… food riots… killer smog… cancers, immune disorders.
Seems every five minutes the “powers that be” shift the vernacular to suit their PR needs of the minute… Let’s stay true to course… decentralization of power, power to the people, clean energy generation, less is more, cradle to cradle… Whether the planet is cooling or heating or “changing” is out of our hands really at this point… nothing short of the machine coming to a grinding halt will alter the dire ecological consequences of the industrial revolution… let’s focus on habitat, farming, and getting energy conversion secrets out of military labs!
If we can do that this generation… if that can be the green revolution… we might be able to turn the ship around.
[ we return you to your regular programming... ]