Strangely now I can see the old piece just fine. My apologies. I tried to click earlier and admittedly my cable has been acting up so it looked as if it were gone..

I knew there had to be some explanation because as I’ve said before I love Ecorazzi and wouldn’t think a fine blogger like yourself would erase the old post

So please ignore my reply, note AND message and I see now you did leave the old piece intact….

Glad you saw the Fox piece finally (you probably didn’t see it initially because, like most of us, you don’t read Fox!) It came out five days ago yet still most news outlets are referring to the NY post piece (which, by the way is another place whose news I wouldn’t trust

Peace and keep up the good work.

Erin

I appreciate your comment, but I think you’re confused on a few points. First of all, this is an entirely new piece — there’s nothing about this that is revised. It is an update to the post that I wrote yesterday which you can find here.

We never modify stories to reflect new truths — always keeping the information as is. If anything, we add updates to the bottom of posts if new developments occur.

Your comment exists exactly where you left it. Not sure why you felt it had been erased.

With regards to the posting of credit for new information, we give credit where due , but not always consistently. To be fair, I discovered this story last night on my own and saw your comment this morning. In the spirit of community, however, I can definitely add a shout out to your site in the recent update.

And sorry, but your reaction to actually finding something of value over at FOX news is not special. Believe me, there were probably many others that slapped themselves in the forehead as well.

Hope that explains some things!

I cannot believe I did not get any credit in the newly revised piece you just wrote (it’s nice isn’t that you’re not writing in print so you can just change the earlier piece you wrote to suit what you want to say? I don’t know how to contact you so I’m just going to write it here for the world to see. *I* am the one who commented last night and included the Fox piece. I ALSO said who knows when the next time is I’d include a Fox News link to an article because I too am not a big fan. I believe someone else had written a comment to your earlier revised piece and your rebuttal included something about they might as well read Fox. When I posted my reply I said it’s funny you mention Fox since they’re the ones who stuck up for Sting. I explained that the Post article was inaccurate at best…

So now you give me NO credit for bringing this article to your attention? USE my line about Fox and erase my ACCURATE post from before? At least issue me some cred since thankfully I did a screen shot of your old article, along with the comments (including yours)

Thank you

Erin

http://BrainyBlonde.com Eco activist and owner of MY blog for eight years.