Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

McDonalds Uses Michael Vick To Market Product To Children

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

You know what I love in my Happy Meal? A snack-size portion of animal abuse!

Obviously I’m joking about the animal abuse thing, but McDonalds most definitely isn’t! TMZ is reporting that after purchasing a Happy Meal at a Hollywood McDonalds, they noticed something rather odd about the box (besides of course the nasty fast-food smells billowing out).

TMZ’s Happy Meal turned out to be covered in an advertisement for six different electronic sports games all named after famous athletes, including one bearing the image of Michael Vick. As everyone surely knows by now, Michael Vick is currently serving 23 months in federal prison on animal abuse charges after he was found guilty for his involvement with an underground dogfighting ring.

Now listen, Michael Vick did something very, very stupid and now he is paying for that mistake. While I may not ever be a Vick fan myself, surely I don’t think he should be excommunicated from society for the rest of his life. However, using a convicted felon who participated in an extreme act of cruelty to market products to children seems a little inappropriate, if you ask me. Then again we’re talking about the same company who just recently stole Paul McCartney’s image.

What do you think about all of this, Ecorazzi readers? Chime in and share your thoughts!

thanks: story submitted by Erin over at brainyblonde.com!

[UPDATE: Looks like McDonalds is apologizing. Apparently, the Happy Meal box is from a partnership from 2004 and it was inadvertently distributed. Whoops. Full story here.]

Like us on Facebook:
0 Comments
shutterstock_526346818

Sheep Farmer Fined For Killing Swans – How Anti-Cruelty Laws Are Never For The Animals

The law reprimands him, not because he killed the swans, but because his treatment of them.

shutterstock_526720321

Relationships With Non-Vegans And Why They’re Problematic

Engaging in animal exploitation every day should be a deal breaker.

note

For Those Upset By The New £5 Notes

We’re merely telling the non-vegan public that one form of animal use is worse than another.