Comments on: Kate Hudson’s Green Shampoo Coming To Target, CVS http://www.ecorazzi.com/2008/10/28/kate-hudsons-green-shampoo-coming-to-target-cvs/ celebrities caught green-handed Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:08:16 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Suz http://www.ecorazzi.com/2008/10/28/kate-hudsons-green-shampoo-coming-to-target-cvs/comment-page-1/#comment-352846 Suz Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:37:27 +0000 http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=9408#comment-352846 CLONED LINE? What does this mean? CLONED LINE? What does this mean?

]]> By: Strange Shampoo Stories http://www.ecorazzi.com/2008/10/28/kate-hudsons-green-shampoo-coming-to-target-cvs/comment-page-1/#comment-157366 Strange Shampoo Stories Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:58:15 +0000 http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=9408#comment-157366 [...] Kate Hudson’s Green Shampoo Coming To Target, CVS [...] [...] Kate Hudson’s Green Shampoo Coming To Target, CVS [...]

]]> By: Jen http://www.ecorazzi.com/2008/10/28/kate-hudsons-green-shampoo-coming-to-target-cvs/comment-page-1/#comment-155710 Jen Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:54:23 +0000 http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=9408#comment-155710 Every time I see her she is draped in some kind of dead animal so I think her "cruelty free" line is all about PR. Every time I see her she is draped in some kind of dead animal so I think her “cruelty free” line is all about PR.

]]> By: Roni Darugi http://www.ecorazzi.com/2008/10/28/kate-hudsons-green-shampoo-coming-to-target-cvs/comment-page-1/#comment-155098 Roni Darugi Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:24:04 +0000 http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=9408#comment-155098 To associate yourself with an unethical company like Burberry, who obviously doesn't care about the immoral treatment of animals, and then put out a "green" shampoo that will benefit Global Wildlife Conservation Organization is pretty hypocritical if you ask me. I'm surprised that you would even cover Kate Hudson's new (cloned?)line (regardless if it's supposedly green). What? To associate yourself with an unethical company like Burberry, who obviously doesn’t care about the immoral treatment of animals, and then put out a “green” shampoo that will benefit Global Wildlife Conservation Organization is pretty hypocritical if you ask me.

I’m surprised that you would even cover Kate Hudson’s new (cloned?)line (regardless if it’s supposedly green).

What?

]]>