Comments on: Was Maggie Gyllenhaal Wearing Fur At MoMa Film Benefit?

By: Tom

Tom — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:25:00 +0000

Maggie, who I knew before she was famous, is a hypocrite on every level–fake or not, the intention is to appear to be wearing fur, and it’s vile. How about all that makeup? Is that cruelty free? She is just another rich girl who grew up with hollywood parents and, ‘gee, maybe if i show my breasts and have my ass spanked’ i’ll have a big success.

By: Pamela

Pamela — Sun, 14 Dec 2008 03:55:07 +0000

A lot of “faux” fur is actually real fur and just labeled deceptively – especially that which comes from China, etc. JC!!! Why wear fur at all, even if it’s supposedly “fake,” which it often is NOT?!! It is still glamorizing a horrific industry. Why can’t people just the f*ck off of wearing fur, period!

By: michael

michael — Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:38:09 +0000

Mark, we answered your email with this post earlier this morning. Thanks again.

http://www.ecorazzi.com/2008/11/16/update-maggie-gyllenhaal-was-wearing-real-fur-did-louis-vuitton-change-site/

By: Mark

Mark — Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:29:46 +0000

I emailed this website yesterday and was told it would be looked into, and in fact on the Louis Vuitton website it does NOT say faux fur in the description, it says FOX fur.

By: Update: Maggie Gyllenhaal WAS Wearing Real Fur. Did Louis Vuitton Change Site // Archives // ecorazzi.com :: the latest in green gossip

Sun, 16 Nov 2008 16:19:30 +0000

[...] the year that I have worked for Ecorazzi the Maggie Gyllenhaal fur controversy has absolutely been the most intense, ever-changing, phone calls in the middle of the night kinda [...]

By: Mia

Mia — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:33:48 +0000

I’m afraid that it IS a REAL FOX-fur jacket, at least according to the Louis Vuitton website (I checked it in all languages) and all those scanned fashion magazine pages I was able to find online. NONE of the sources said that it would be fake.

And even if it somehow happened to be faux, I’d find wearing such real-looking coat as morally wrong as a real one, because it still promotes that brutal “style”.
I really hope I’d be wrong about this because I like Maggie Gyllenhaal and I’ve thought that she’s a sensible and environmentally aware person.

I expect her to give a statement about this garment, but I’m afraid she just wants everyone to forget about it. I know I won’t and I hope any other animal and environment -loving person doesn’t either.

By: HSUS’s Goes Cruel Vs. Cool With Nigel Barker, Agyness Deyn And More // Archives // ecorazzi.com :: the latest in green gossip

Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:52:04 +0000

[...] call to Chloe Jo, the General of Girlie Girl Army ,and gossiped about the whole Maggie Gyllenhaal fur controversy. Oh, [...]

By: The Discerning Brute

The Discerning Brute — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:30:22 +0000

Regardless, she’s making fur look acceptable. It looks gross either way.

By: VeggieTart

VeggieTart — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:17:10 +0000

I’d like to believe it’s fake, but too many “fake” furs are falsely labeled. Maggie G. may have believed she’s wearing fake but have been duped.

By: FurFree Vixen

FurFree Vixen — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:06:33 +0000

Don’t be fooled — LOUIS VUITTON DOES NOT DO FAKE FURS. I don’t know why you’d believe that they do. Someone is pulling your chain. This is definitely a real fur. Disgusted.