Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

Bruce Willis Resolves Green Rubber Dispute, Stays Involved With Company

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

For those of you that could barely get through Thanksgiving dinner without wondering if Bruce Willis was going to resolve his dispute with Green Rubber Global, we’ve got good news.

As previously reported, Wilis decided to sue the company after plans to go ahead with the non-toxic and recyclable rubber were put on hold due to the weak global economy. The actor immediately wanted his $2 million investment back — but received only about $1.1 million. The lawsuit sought the remaining $900,000.

Now, it appears that the dispute has been settled — with Willis deciding to remain vested in the company. “Having resolved the matter, I will continue to maintain a shareholding position in the company and I wish the company, the directors and my fellow shareholders the very best for the future,” Willis said in a statement. “I continue to believe in the green rubber technology and the vast potential it holds for the environment,” he added.

Hmm…I wonder what type of deal was made to bury this problem quick? Either way, its good to see Willis remaining on board to see this promising tech to fruition. Check out the official site for more information.

Like us on Facebook:
0 Comments

Hardheaded Vegan Bullies, and What to Do About Them

My “fighting words” are not calling someone “elitist,” “stupid,” or a “lunatic.” They’re “education,” “freedom,” and “equality.”

Protesting Kylie Jenner’s Use of Fur Doesn’t Help Animals

Campaigns against fur, whether that’s at the PETA level or a small mobbing like this, don’t work because they promote the use of other animal products.

Collaborating with animal exploiters won’t help animals

The two sides claim to both have the “health and well-being of animals” in mind in this partnership, but one likely said “after profitability” under their breath.