<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ecorazzi Asks: Recycled Vintage Fur: Nay Or Yea?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/02/27/ecorazzi-asks-recycled-vintage-fur-nay-or-yea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/02/27/ecorazzi-asks-recycled-vintage-fur-nay-or-yea/</link>
	<description>Causes Entertainment Lifestyle Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darien</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/02/27/ecorazzi-asks-recycled-vintage-fur-nay-or-yea/comment-page-2/#comment-1469522</link>
		<dc:creator>Darien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 02:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=13927#comment-1469522</guid>
		<description>Now new fur is a bit of a controversial topic for me. I see several beautiful (warm) coats in thrift shops. Now wouldnt it be going against our morals to not reuse these items? After all, we already killed that animal, and it was in a day when regulations were not in our power, so it is not our generations fault as to how the coat came about.  

If the designer bought the fur or hyde after the animal has been used for food, then by all means, save what you can use what you can. I will NOT agree however, with killing the animal for the fur and then considering the rest for food. 

I went into a &quot;Fur Boutique&quot; the other day just to see what a new fur store was like. It was sort of creepy, fur everywhere. I asked where he got the fur, and he would not answer me. Im not sure if it was because he was nervous i was against fur, but he pretended that he did not know where the fur he bought for HIS store was from. 

The thing that makes me the most angry in this world are lies, ignorance and lack of apathy. 
Lies: This man knew where his fur came from
Ignorance: If he was truthful about not knowing the source, he should get in the know! That is disgusting to even think about. 
Lack of apathy: I guess this one is more my opinion, I cannot believe someone could start a business in that industry and not seem to hate his job. But then again, money is money and what is a few dead furry cute bunny animals right????

!Wrong.

But im not sure if i have any opinion that counts, because im not in that industry. So how would I know right from wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now new fur is a bit of a controversial topic for me. I see several beautiful (warm) coats in thrift shops. Now wouldnt it be going against our morals to not reuse these items? After all, we already killed that animal, and it was in a day when regulations were not in our power, so it is not our generations fault as to how the coat came about.  </p>
<p>If the designer bought the fur or hyde after the animal has been used for food, then by all means, save what you can use what you can. I will NOT agree however, with killing the animal for the fur and then considering the rest for food. </p>
<p>I went into a &#8220;Fur Boutique&#8221; the other day just to see what a new fur store was like. It was sort of creepy, fur everywhere. I asked where he got the fur, and he would not answer me. Im not sure if it was because he was nervous i was against fur, but he pretended that he did not know where the fur he bought for HIS store was from. </p>
<p>The thing that makes me the most angry in this world are lies, ignorance and lack of apathy.<br />
Lies: This man knew where his fur came from<br />
Ignorance: If he was truthful about not knowing the source, he should get in the know! That is disgusting to even think about.<br />
Lack of apathy: I guess this one is more my opinion, I cannot believe someone could start a business in that industry and not seem to hate his job. But then again, money is money and what is a few dead furry cute bunny animals right????</p>
<p>!Wrong.</p>
<p>But im not sure if i have any opinion that counts, because im not in that industry. So how would I know right from wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/02/27/ecorazzi-asks-recycled-vintage-fur-nay-or-yea/comment-page-2/#comment-1161068</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 00:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=13927#comment-1161068</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not simply about fur, also about promoting less consumerism.  I have a beautiful coat, that happens to be fur, that I didn&#039;t buy.  I don&#039;t even buy clothes, they are all swapped or second hand, and from my mother&#039;s aunt&#039;s closet.  I also dumpster-dive, so that my money doesn&#039;t go into the system. Anything I can get for free i do, and give away what i don&#039;t need for what I do need. So next time you judge someone wearing a fur coat, don&#039;t judge them. They might be more aware than you think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not simply about fur, also about promoting less consumerism.  I have a beautiful coat, that happens to be fur, that I didn&#8217;t buy.  I don&#8217;t even buy clothes, they are all swapped or second hand, and from my mother&#8217;s aunt&#8217;s closet.  I also dumpster-dive, so that my money doesn&#8217;t go into the system. Anything I can get for free i do, and give away what i don&#8217;t need for what I do need. So next time you judge someone wearing a fur coat, don&#8217;t judge them. They might be more aware than you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarlett</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/02/27/ecorazzi-asks-recycled-vintage-fur-nay-or-yea/comment-page-1/#comment-994478</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=13927#comment-994478</guid>
		<description>thats a bit harsh. your the oe who talked about the other lady&#039;s grandma&#039;s fur coat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats a bit harsh. your the oe who talked about the other lady&#8217;s grandma&#8217;s fur coat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarlett</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/02/27/ecorazzi-asks-recycled-vintage-fur-nay-or-yea/comment-page-1/#comment-994016</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=13927#comment-994016</guid>
		<description>I would never weare fur though. I beleive that it encourages the wrong things. I also couldent walk around wondering if the mink im wearing was skinned alive or blodgened to death. I could weare syntetic though, which I admit is encouraging exactly the same fur and shows that I desire the cuddly softness of fur but am to ashamed to wear real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would never weare fur though. I beleive that it encourages the wrong things. I also couldent walk around wondering if the mink im wearing was skinned alive or blodgened to death. I could weare syntetic though, which I admit is encouraging exactly the same fur and shows that I desire the cuddly softness of fur but am to ashamed to wear real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarlett</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/02/27/ecorazzi-asks-recycled-vintage-fur-nay-or-yea/comment-page-1/#comment-994013</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=13927#comment-994013</guid>
		<description>Rabbit definately and mink possibly are often used in cat and dog food. It may sound repulsive but its true. Those farming fur are going to want the full possible amount of money that they can make out of their animals and often won&#039;t let it wase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rabbit definately and mink possibly are often used in cat and dog food. It may sound repulsive but its true. Those farming fur are going to want the full possible amount of money that they can make out of their animals and often won&#8217;t let it wase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: don miguelo</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/02/27/ecorazzi-asks-recycled-vintage-fur-nay-or-yea/comment-page-1/#comment-589688</link>
		<dc:creator>don miguelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=13927#comment-589688</guid>
		<description>Fur is an Industry and wearing it WILL PROMOTE it, unless you tell every person who sees you wearing it that it was handed down and you would never buy a new coat.  However, that old coat is not hurting new animals, and re-using is good as it makes their involuntary sacrifice at least meaningful if it keeps you warm a few more decades. If we just burn them all that is a kind of waste as well. Conundrum! 

This is one of those issue that it&#039;s easier to be all for it aor all against it, as the middle is so full of land mines it&#039;s ridiculous.  I don&#039;t have a resolution for you all here, except that maybe it&#039;s up to you as a person to see how you feel about it.  I personally don&#039;t do it, but have understanding for people who do.  Buying a new fur coat at Macy&#039;s is unacceptable to me, especially if you could get a vintage one or just an organic non-animal coat somewhere else so easily these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fur is an Industry and wearing it WILL PROMOTE it, unless you tell every person who sees you wearing it that it was handed down and you would never buy a new coat.  However, that old coat is not hurting new animals, and re-using is good as it makes their involuntary sacrifice at least meaningful if it keeps you warm a few more decades. If we just burn them all that is a kind of waste as well. Conundrum! </p>
<p>This is one of those issue that it&#8217;s easier to be all for it aor all against it, as the middle is so full of land mines it&#8217;s ridiculous.  I don&#8217;t have a resolution for you all here, except that maybe it&#8217;s up to you as a person to see how you feel about it.  I personally don&#8217;t do it, but have understanding for people who do.  Buying a new fur coat at Macy&#8217;s is unacceptable to me, especially if you could get a vintage one or just an organic non-animal coat somewhere else so easily these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucy</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/02/27/ecorazzi-asks-recycled-vintage-fur-nay-or-yea/comment-page-1/#comment-589492</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=13927#comment-589492</guid>
		<description>I wear fur. 

I am a firm believer that discarding, destroying or burning a vintage fur is an insult to the animals that were sacrificed to make it. And, like with the hair of the women of Auschwitz on display at the museum there, a &#039;vintage&#039; necklace &#039;made of poor human orphan teeth&#039; would probably be honoured in it&#039;s own way as well.

I only buy my furs from secondhand, non-for-profit stores. Not exclusive boutiques dedicated to the trade. I&#039;d like the money I spend on my furs to at least go to a good cause rather than someone&#039;s pocket. I make a point to explain where I purchased the fur and why to anyone who asks how I got a hold of it.

I am much more inclined to pest fur. I&#039;d rather an animal have a quick death (to protect the fur from rigidity that occurs after rigor mortis) and be skinned for fur than die as rabbits and foxes do in the wild where they are considered a threat to the native ecosystem; either a painful death by trapping, or a long and terrifying death by poisoning or disease (myxomatosis here... urk, blindness, paralysis and death via starvation) - all of which can take days to occur. 

I don&#039;t feel guilty in the slightest while wearing my coats. 

And, just for those arguing about the impact we have on the enviroment (people who use real fur are big, bad, resource-gobbling, globe-killing meanies!!), did you think about the impact the fabrication of the materials used for faux fur and various other synthetics have? 

My opinion of the matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wear fur. </p>
<p>I am a firm believer that discarding, destroying or burning a vintage fur is an insult to the animals that were sacrificed to make it. And, like with the hair of the women of Auschwitz on display at the museum there, a &#8216;vintage&#8217; necklace &#8216;made of poor human orphan teeth&#8217; would probably be honoured in it&#8217;s own way as well.</p>
<p>I only buy my furs from secondhand, non-for-profit stores. Not exclusive boutiques dedicated to the trade. I&#8217;d like the money I spend on my furs to at least go to a good cause rather than someone&#8217;s pocket. I make a point to explain where I purchased the fur and why to anyone who asks how I got a hold of it.</p>
<p>I am much more inclined to pest fur. I&#8217;d rather an animal have a quick death (to protect the fur from rigidity that occurs after rigor mortis) and be skinned for fur than die as rabbits and foxes do in the wild where they are considered a threat to the native ecosystem; either a painful death by trapping, or a long and terrifying death by poisoning or disease (myxomatosis here&#8230; urk, blindness, paralysis and death via starvation) &#8211; all of which can take days to occur. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t feel guilty in the slightest while wearing my coats. </p>
<p>And, just for those arguing about the impact we have on the enviroment (people who use real fur are big, bad, resource-gobbling, globe-killing meanies!!), did you think about the impact the fabrication of the materials used for faux fur and various other synthetics have? </p>
<p>My opinion of the matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louise</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/02/27/ecorazzi-asks-recycled-vintage-fur-nay-or-yea/comment-page-1/#comment-578728</link>
		<dc:creator>Louise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=13927#comment-578728</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more with Maria&#039;s last response. Fur is the absolute antithesis of realisable potential, and it is also wasteful; never in my life have I seen mink or fox on the menu, and I doubt you have either. Following from this, I&#039;d like to respond to Charlotte who wrote:

&quot;what is the difference of wearing heirloom leather and vintage fur? They are both from animals… or are cows less ‘cute’ than rabbits and minks, and therefore less important?&quot;

The difference between leather and fur has nothing to do with the &#039;cuteness&#039; of the animals in question, rather their utility. Beef cattle are raised primarily for meat, and once they have been slaughtered nothing goes to waste, including the hide. Leather is not a symbol of wastefulness, nor does it represent ostentatious vulgarity. In contrast, fur does. (Rabbits may also be farmed for meat but in most cases they are raised for fur).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more with Maria&#8217;s last response. Fur is the absolute antithesis of realisable potential, and it is also wasteful; never in my life have I seen mink or fox on the menu, and I doubt you have either. Following from this, I&#8217;d like to respond to Charlotte who wrote:</p>
<p>&#8220;what is the difference of wearing heirloom leather and vintage fur? They are both from animals… or are cows less ‘cute’ than rabbits and minks, and therefore less important?&#8221;</p>
<p>The difference between leather and fur has nothing to do with the &#8216;cuteness&#8217; of the animals in question, rather their utility. Beef cattle are raised primarily for meat, and once they have been slaughtered nothing goes to waste, including the hide. Leather is not a symbol of wastefulness, nor does it represent ostentatious vulgarity. In contrast, fur does. (Rabbits may also be farmed for meat but in most cases they are raised for fur).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/02/27/ecorazzi-asks-recycled-vintage-fur-nay-or-yea/comment-page-1/#comment-573937</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 18:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=13927#comment-573937</guid>
		<description>It is illogical to elevate ourselves above our concept of ‘animal’ to a degree that allows us to define ourselves as ‘human’ with the concept of being ‘humane’ and then to simultaneously descend ourselves into the depths of the animal kingdom ‘red in tooth and claw’.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is illogical to elevate ourselves above our concept of ‘animal’ to a degree that allows us to define ourselves as ‘human’ with the concept of being ‘humane’ and then to simultaneously descend ourselves into the depths of the animal kingdom ‘red in tooth and claw’.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/02/27/ecorazzi-asks-recycled-vintage-fur-nay-or-yea/comment-page-1/#comment-573884</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 17:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=13927#comment-573884</guid>
		<description>People are animals too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People are animals too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

