<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cameron Diaz Makes A Low-Budget Environmental Documentary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/06/03/cameron-diaz-makes-low-budget-environmental-documentary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/06/03/cameron-diaz-makes-low-budget-environmental-documentary/</link>
	<description>celebrities caught green-handed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:08:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lucky</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/06/03/cameron-diaz-makes-low-budget-environmental-documentary/comment-page-1/#comment-329048</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=16984#comment-329048</guid>
		<description>Stop bashing Cameron. I dislike people who just can&#039;t keep their mouth shut when they should. GROW UP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stop bashing Cameron. I dislike people who just can&#8217;t keep their mouth shut when they should. GROW UP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celebrity Thursday: Cameron Diaz makes a low-budget enviro documentary &#124; BambiGoesGreen</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/06/03/cameron-diaz-makes-low-budget-environmental-documentary/comment-page-1/#comment-328474</link>
		<dc:creator>Celebrity Thursday: Cameron Diaz makes a low-budget enviro documentary &#124; BambiGoesGreen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=16984#comment-328474</guid>
		<description>[...] [via] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [via] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RemyC</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/06/03/cameron-diaz-makes-low-budget-environmental-documentary/comment-page-1/#comment-319949</link>
		<dc:creator>RemyC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 03:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=16984#comment-319949</guid>
		<description>Anyone has $4000 I can borrow so I can attend the TED conference next year?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone has $4000 I can borrow so I can attend the TED conference next year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/06/03/cameron-diaz-makes-low-budget-environmental-documentary/comment-page-1/#comment-319463</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 17:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=16984#comment-319463</guid>
		<description>LolaK;
Good rebuttal! Doing some research are we? 
Good for you. Keep going.
I will be as brief as I can.
1.“in just 50 years it increased to approximately 380 ppm” 
Agreed. It may be all caused by humans. It may not. The human contribution is so small it may turn out to be statistically insignificant. 
The carbon cycle is not as well understood as once thought.
http://theresilientearth.com/?q=content/new-jelly-pump-rewrites-carbon-cycle
2. The concept of “my truth”  belongs to religion not science. There is one truth. You may or may not believe it. It depends on you understanding.
3. “that global warming isn’t real” 
Never claimed GW is not real. The question is not “did it happen” but rather what caused it. Big difference. My view is similar to the emerging scientific consensus that  is was nearly all natural and BTW stopped 7 years ago. Look it up. 
See Maunder minimum then lookup current solar cycle activity. Then review ENSO, PDO and AMO ocean cycles and compare. It should scare you. Cold is MUCH worse than warm.
4. 20% of Denmark’s energy ‘comes from wind’
Denmark is lucky to be small and where they are. Look up what it will take to generate even 10% of North America’s Power with Wind. Note that wind generation produces less that 20%  of rated output so it takes 5 times the capacity. Solar MIGHT be a better choice.
5. Why should we remain stuck in fossil fuels?
We should not. However the transition will happen no matter what as the resource runs low, we don’t need to cause global economic hardship to force it out now based on a false premis.
5. Environmentalism.
There are so many REAL problems that need resolution. After years of alarmism from Gore, Suzuki,…… people will lose patients with the constant cries of impending doom and simply switch off. I am already sick of the term Green.
 I’m an environmentalist and I don’t belong to any group - I’m NOT a vegetarian, I DO reduce, reuse, recycle, don’t waste water or electricity because it cost money. I walk as much as I feel like will never use  public transportation, use as much environmental friendly products as I can, etc. 
I short I do what I believe will have positive effects. I don’t pay attention to CO2 cutting measures because they are not relevant to anything.
6. “Diaz is an airhead” – 
That was just for fun. I don’t know her, she may be normal. 
But she is a celebrity from Hollywood…. Well most of them seem pretty air headed.
So anyway, LolaK; you have (unwittingly???) provided the debate my initial stick poking comments were designed to generate. 
I hope you enjoyed it as much as I and I hope you will continue to research this topic. I am convinced that understanding will soften your fears of impending doom. 
Try not to get too angry as you discover the underlying agenda. It can be infuriating to realize how we have been manipulated.
Take a valium, then review some of these quotes from famous Global Warming activists:
http://www.green-agenda.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LolaK;<br />
Good rebuttal! Doing some research are we?<br />
Good for you. Keep going.<br />
I will be as brief as I can.<br />
1.“in just 50 years it increased to approximately 380 ppm”<br />
Agreed. It may be all caused by humans. It may not. The human contribution is so small it may turn out to be statistically insignificant.<br />
The carbon cycle is not as well understood as once thought.<br />
<a href="http://theresilientearth.com/?q=content/new-jelly-pump-rewrites-carbon-cycle" rel="nofollow">http://theresilientearth.com/?q=content/new-jelly-pump-rewrites-carbon-cycle</a><br />
2. The concept of “my truth”  belongs to religion not science. There is one truth. You may or may not believe it. It depends on you understanding.<br />
3. “that global warming isn’t real”<br />
Never claimed GW is not real. The question is not “did it happen” but rather what caused it. Big difference. My view is similar to the emerging scientific consensus that  is was nearly all natural and BTW stopped 7 years ago. Look it up.<br />
See Maunder minimum then lookup current solar cycle activity. Then review ENSO, PDO and AMO ocean cycles and compare. It should scare you. Cold is MUCH worse than warm.<br />
4. 20% of Denmark’s energy ‘comes from wind’<br />
Denmark is lucky to be small and where they are. Look up what it will take to generate even 10% of North America’s Power with Wind. Note that wind generation produces less that 20%  of rated output so it takes 5 times the capacity. Solar MIGHT be a better choice.<br />
5. Why should we remain stuck in fossil fuels?<br />
We should not. However the transition will happen no matter what as the resource runs low, we don’t need to cause global economic hardship to force it out now based on a false premis.<br />
5. Environmentalism.<br />
There are so many REAL problems that need resolution. After years of alarmism from Gore, Suzuki,…… people will lose patients with the constant cries of impending doom and simply switch off. I am already sick of the term Green.<br />
 I’m an environmentalist and I don’t belong to any group &#8211; I’m NOT a vegetarian, I DO reduce, reuse, recycle, don’t waste water or electricity because it cost money. I walk as much as I feel like will never use  public transportation, use as much environmental friendly products as I can, etc.<br />
I short I do what I believe will have positive effects. I don’t pay attention to CO2 cutting measures because they are not relevant to anything.<br />
6. “Diaz is an airhead” –<br />
That was just for fun. I don’t know her, she may be normal.<br />
But she is a celebrity from Hollywood…. Well most of them seem pretty air headed.<br />
So anyway, LolaK; you have (unwittingly???) provided the debate my initial stick poking comments were designed to generate.<br />
I hope you enjoyed it as much as I and I hope you will continue to research this topic. I am convinced that understanding will soften your fears of impending doom.<br />
Try not to get too angry as you discover the underlying agenda. It can be infuriating to realize how we have been manipulated.<br />
Take a valium, then review some of these quotes from famous Global Warming activists:<br />
<a href="http://www.green-agenda.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.green-agenda.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whoever...</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/06/03/cameron-diaz-makes-low-budget-environmental-documentary/comment-page-1/#comment-319189</link>
		<dc:creator>Whoever...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 22:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=16984#comment-319189</guid>
		<description>Lolak  :) have a great weekend too *

@Gary:

Thank you!

&quot;Did you know that 280 ppm is just about the lowest level in history.&quot; - No, but don&#039;t forget that in just 50 years it increased to approximately 380 ppm! Don&#039;t you think it&#039;s too much of a coincidence that these last 50 years have also been the most active decades when it comes to human activities (industry, farming, transportation, etc.)?

&quot;there is no proof that the current rise is caused mostly by mankind&quot; - Well that&#039;s &#039;your truth&#039;. I&#039;m sorry but from all I&#039;ve heard, seen, read and experienced, &#039;my truth&#039; tells me that there is more than enough proof that this dramatic increase is the result of human activities.

But even if there is a possibility that global warming isn&#039;t real, why shouldn&#039;t we massively invest on clean renewable energies for instance?
Do you know that 20% of Denmark&#039;s energy &#039;comes from wind&#039;? And that there&#039;s an entire town in Germany completely self sufficient in energy produced from solar panels? Why shouldn&#039;t we use geothermal and tidal energy as well? And what about so many others out there? Why should we remain stuck in fossil fuels, which by the way as you well know are finite? 

&quot;When it is over (soon) Environmentalism will take decades to recover to any useful level of credibility.&quot; - Why? Environmentalism isn&#039;t just global warming! Environmentalism is more than NGOs fighting for the planet, it&#039;s a way of life! I&#039;m an environmentalist and I don&#039;t belong to any group - I&#039;m a vegetarian, I reduce, reuse, recycle, don&#039;t waste water or electricity, walk as much as I can or use public transportation, use as much environmental friendly products as I can, etc. This way I&#039;m healthier, I save money and the natural resources. Actually there&#039;s not one single downside to it.

&quot;Diaz is an airhead&quot; - There you go again! Why don&#039;t you give people credit for trying to improve themselves? I also thought that about her in the past but this video she did made me respect her for actually getting involved and learn more!
And no I&#039;m not a fan of hers!

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lolak  <img src='http://www.ecorazzi.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  have a great weekend too *</p>
<p>@Gary:</p>
<p>Thank you!</p>
<p>&#8220;Did you know that 280 ppm is just about the lowest level in history.&#8221; &#8211; No, but don&#8217;t forget that in just 50 years it increased to approximately 380 ppm! Don&#8217;t you think it&#8217;s too much of a coincidence that these last 50 years have also been the most active decades when it comes to human activities (industry, farming, transportation, etc.)?</p>
<p>&#8220;there is no proof that the current rise is caused mostly by mankind&#8221; &#8211; Well that&#8217;s &#8216;your truth&#8217;. I&#8217;m sorry but from all I&#8217;ve heard, seen, read and experienced, &#8216;my truth&#8217; tells me that there is more than enough proof that this dramatic increase is the result of human activities.</p>
<p>But even if there is a possibility that global warming isn&#8217;t real, why shouldn&#8217;t we massively invest on clean renewable energies for instance?<br />
Do you know that 20% of Denmark&#8217;s energy &#8216;comes from wind&#8217;? And that there&#8217;s an entire town in Germany completely self sufficient in energy produced from solar panels? Why shouldn&#8217;t we use geothermal and tidal energy as well? And what about so many others out there? Why should we remain stuck in fossil fuels, which by the way as you well know are finite? </p>
<p>&#8220;When it is over (soon) Environmentalism will take decades to recover to any useful level of credibility.&#8221; &#8211; Why? Environmentalism isn&#8217;t just global warming! Environmentalism is more than NGOs fighting for the planet, it&#8217;s a way of life! I&#8217;m an environmentalist and I don&#8217;t belong to any group &#8211; I&#8217;m a vegetarian, I reduce, reuse, recycle, don&#8217;t waste water or electricity, walk as much as I can or use public transportation, use as much environmental friendly products as I can, etc. This way I&#8217;m healthier, I save money and the natural resources. Actually there&#8217;s not one single downside to it.</p>
<p>&#8220;Diaz is an airhead&#8221; &#8211; There you go again! Why don&#8217;t you give people credit for trying to improve themselves? I also thought that about her in the past but this video she did made me respect her for actually getting involved and learn more!<br />
And no I&#8217;m not a fan of hers!</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.ecorazzi.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/06/03/cameron-diaz-makes-low-budget-environmental-documentary/comment-page-1/#comment-319172</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 21:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=16984#comment-319172</guid>
		<description>LolaK;
Nope!  
I am happy just that sombody is willing to go looking for knowledge. 
Open minded research will lead to truth any which way you figure it.

What I believe is not relevent or important.

The fact that I had some small part in getting someone to look, IS.

Picking Fights? Not me. If you look back up the thread, you will see the instigator was you:
&quot;@ Brian Johnson I feel so sorry for you and your ignorance,&quot;

Anyway I just find it amusing to poke sticks and fundamentalists of any kind.

Don&#039;t tell anyone but I am an environmental advocate myself. I just happen to believe in real science as opposed to AGW junk science.

Have a great weekend LolaK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LolaK;<br />
Nope!<br />
I am happy just that sombody is willing to go looking for knowledge.<br />
Open minded research will lead to truth any which way you figure it.</p>
<p>What I believe is not relevent or important.</p>
<p>The fact that I had some small part in getting someone to look, IS.</p>
<p>Picking Fights? Not me. If you look back up the thread, you will see the instigator was you:<br />
&#8220;@ Brian Johnson I feel so sorry for you and your ignorance,&#8221;</p>
<p>Anyway I just find it amusing to poke sticks and fundamentalists of any kind.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t tell anyone but I am an environmental advocate myself. I just happen to believe in real science as opposed to AGW junk science.</p>
<p>Have a great weekend LolaK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LolaK</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/06/03/cameron-diaz-makes-low-budget-environmental-documentary/comment-page-1/#comment-319160</link>
		<dc:creator>LolaK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 20:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=16984#comment-319160</guid>
		<description>@ Gary:

    Wow, coming from you, I find that hilarious. When you say learning about what you are preaching, you mean learning about the side that you believe is correct, right. Since that is obviously what you have been doing. I still just don&#039;t understand why you come on here? If we are all so uneducated why even bother posting on this site. Surely you can find another place to pick fights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Gary:</p>
<p>    Wow, coming from you, I find that hilarious. When you say learning about what you are preaching, you mean learning about the side that you believe is correct, right. Since that is obviously what you have been doing. I still just don&#8217;t understand why you come on here? If we are all so uneducated why even bother posting on this site. Surely you can find another place to pick fights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/06/03/cameron-diaz-makes-low-budget-environmental-documentary/comment-page-1/#comment-319159</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 20:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=16984#comment-319159</guid>
		<description>Whoever;
Wow ... I am impressed.
Articulate, and mostly accurate.
And quite insulting as well.
I think I like You.
Bravo for doing some research.  (MANY people mix up CO2 and CO BTW)
Keep going with that, you will find it fascinating. Particularly when you look at crop yield increases and CO2 levels. Did you know that 1000 to 1500 ppm are best for crops?
Did you know that 280 ppm is just about the lowest level in history. 
And did you know that there is no proof that the current rise is caused mostly by mankind? That is just speculation. 
And there is no danger that .038% CO2 will displace the 21% of oxygen. (of .05% or .15% for that matter)
As for being insulting and rude, I learned that from Al Gore. Like he said You need to exaggerate and intimidate to get people to notice. Worked for him.
You know what burns me most about this AGW scam?
When it is over (soon) Environmentalism will take decades to recover to any useful level of credibility.
There are so many really good causes that need people like you and nobody will listen because they will remember the Global Warming Scam.
Too bad.

LolaK - You could learn a lot from Whoever.  Start learning about what you are preeching and one day you will be respectfully listened to.

Oh and just BTW - Diaz is an airhead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoever;<br />
Wow &#8230; I am impressed.<br />
Articulate, and mostly accurate.<br />
And quite insulting as well.<br />
I think I like You.<br />
Bravo for doing some research.  (MANY people mix up CO2 and CO BTW)<br />
Keep going with that, you will find it fascinating. Particularly when you look at crop yield increases and CO2 levels. Did you know that 1000 to 1500 ppm are best for crops?<br />
Did you know that 280 ppm is just about the lowest level in history.<br />
And did you know that there is no proof that the current rise is caused mostly by mankind? That is just speculation.<br />
And there is no danger that .038% CO2 will displace the 21% of oxygen. (of .05% or .15% for that matter)<br />
As for being insulting and rude, I learned that from Al Gore. Like he said You need to exaggerate and intimidate to get people to notice. Worked for him.<br />
You know what burns me most about this AGW scam?<br />
When it is over (soon) Environmentalism will take decades to recover to any useful level of credibility.<br />
There are so many really good causes that need people like you and nobody will listen because they will remember the Global Warming Scam.<br />
Too bad.</p>
<p>LolaK &#8211; You could learn a lot from Whoever.  Start learning about what you are preeching and one day you will be respectfully listened to.</p>
<p>Oh and just BTW &#8211; Diaz is an airhead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LolaK</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/06/03/cameron-diaz-makes-low-budget-environmental-documentary/comment-page-1/#comment-319101</link>
		<dc:creator>LolaK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=16984#comment-319101</guid>
		<description>@ Whoever  I think I kind of want to kiss you right now. I need to have you on my speed dial so I can call you on the, oh so many occasions I run in to people like Gary. Thanks for making my day a little brighter. Hope you have a wonderful weekend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Whoever  I think I kind of want to kiss you right now. I need to have you on my speed dial so I can call you on the, oh so many occasions I run in to people like Gary. Thanks for making my day a little brighter. Hope you have a wonderful weekend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whoever...</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/06/03/cameron-diaz-makes-low-budget-environmental-documentary/comment-page-1/#comment-319086</link>
		<dc:creator>Whoever...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=16984#comment-319086</guid>
		<description>@ Gary:

‘Mea culpa’

You&#039;re absolutely right! I do apologize for my gross mistake. I am ashamed of it… It really was an ignorant remark of me. I don&#039;t know how I got confused.  :(

Have you never made a mistake before? How great it must be to be you – so perfect, knowing everything, never making mistakes and possessing the ultimate truth… just like Brian!!

Contrary to people like you, we Greenies (as you referred to us in an ironic and insulting way) are humble enough to recognize when we&#039;re wrong!!

It&#039;s in fact carbon monoxide (CO) that would kill Brian in that case… and not carbon dioxide (CO2). 

CO binds very strongly to the iron in the hemoglobin in the blood. Once carbon monoxide attaches, it is very difficult to release. So if you breathe in carbon monoxide, it sticks to your hemoglobin and takes up all of the oxygen binding sites. Your blood loses all of its ability to transport oxygen, and you suffocate.

But in case you don&#039;t know, our body also produces CO as part of our normal metabolism. Among other things, it provides cardiac protection in the circulatory system. You see, as everything else, when the levels of a substance are in perfect balance they are harmless.

That&#039;s what&#039;s happening with the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere.
The natural balance has been broken. “we have barely enough to sustain a meagre life cycle now” – that&#039;s not true!

From my ‘huge ignorance’ and the little research I did (I don&#039;t have that much time), allow me to correct you:

- Carbon dioxide CO2 is present in the atmosphere today at 385 (more or less) parts per million (by volume) or 0.039%. 50 years ago it was 280 parts per million. The increase is caused mostly by people burning things, especially fuels - coal, oil and natural gas. Burning wood also releases CO2 to the atmosphere;
- CO2 is not a pollutant but it&#039;s also not harmless; 
- Because carbon dioxide displaces oxygen, it is a health risk since we need oxygen to live. CO2 is an asphyxiant.
- Regarding concentrations of CO2 in air, amounts above 5,000 ppm are considered very unhealthy, and those above about 50,000 ppm (equal to 5% by volume) are considered dangerous to animal life. At levels above 5%, the concentration of CO2 is directly toxic.


 “Sorry for foolishly thinking tree huggers could have measurable IQs.” – How ‘big of you’ to be so respectful (not!) of people who only want to protect our planet and all the creatures who inhabit it!
You know, truly intelligent evolved people respect others and don&#039;t insult them just because they&#039;re trying their best to be better people – something that you, with all your knowledge, are not very familiarized with!

Nevertheless I would like to thank you for pointing out my mistake and make me do some research and thus educate myself a little more. You could have done it in a respectful way, but apparently you think you are superior to anyone who is different from you!
 
At least this made me realize I evolved a little bit during these past months – a few months ago your comment would have upset me a lot. But now it actually doesn&#039;t! Everyone makes mistakes (except you and Brian of course!) and I for one know I&#039;m far from being perfect or an expert in this matter!

Please feel free to correct me again if you think I made more mistakes...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Gary:</p>
<p>‘Mea culpa’</p>
<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right! I do apologize for my gross mistake. I am ashamed of it… It really was an ignorant remark of me. I don&#8217;t know how I got confused.  <img src='http://www.ecorazzi.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Have you never made a mistake before? How great it must be to be you – so perfect, knowing everything, never making mistakes and possessing the ultimate truth… just like Brian!!</p>
<p>Contrary to people like you, we Greenies (as you referred to us in an ironic and insulting way) are humble enough to recognize when we&#8217;re wrong!!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s in fact carbon monoxide (CO) that would kill Brian in that case… and not carbon dioxide (CO2). </p>
<p>CO binds very strongly to the iron in the hemoglobin in the blood. Once carbon monoxide attaches, it is very difficult to release. So if you breathe in carbon monoxide, it sticks to your hemoglobin and takes up all of the oxygen binding sites. Your blood loses all of its ability to transport oxygen, and you suffocate.</p>
<p>But in case you don&#8217;t know, our body also produces CO as part of our normal metabolism. Among other things, it provides cardiac protection in the circulatory system. You see, as everything else, when the levels of a substance are in perfect balance they are harmless.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what&#8217;s happening with the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere.<br />
The natural balance has been broken. “we have barely enough to sustain a meagre life cycle now” – that&#8217;s not true!</p>
<p>From my ‘huge ignorance’ and the little research I did (I don&#8217;t have that much time), allow me to correct you:</p>
<p>- Carbon dioxide CO2 is present in the atmosphere today at 385 (more or less) parts per million (by volume) or 0.039%. 50 years ago it was 280 parts per million. The increase is caused mostly by people burning things, especially fuels &#8211; coal, oil and natural gas. Burning wood also releases CO2 to the atmosphere;<br />
- CO2 is not a pollutant but it&#8217;s also not harmless;<br />
- Because carbon dioxide displaces oxygen, it is a health risk since we need oxygen to live. CO2 is an asphyxiant.<br />
- Regarding concentrations of CO2 in air, amounts above 5,000 ppm are considered very unhealthy, and those above about 50,000 ppm (equal to 5% by volume) are considered dangerous to animal life. At levels above 5%, the concentration of CO2 is directly toxic.</p>
<p> “Sorry for foolishly thinking tree huggers could have measurable IQs.” – How ‘big of you’ to be so respectful (not!) of people who only want to protect our planet and all the creatures who inhabit it!<br />
You know, truly intelligent evolved people respect others and don&#8217;t insult them just because they&#8217;re trying their best to be better people – something that you, with all your knowledge, are not very familiarized with!</p>
<p>Nevertheless I would like to thank you for pointing out my mistake and make me do some research and thus educate myself a little more. You could have done it in a respectful way, but apparently you think you are superior to anyone who is different from you!</p>
<p>At least this made me realize I evolved a little bit during these past months – a few months ago your comment would have upset me a lot. But now it actually doesn&#8217;t! Everyone makes mistakes (except you and Brian of course!) and I for one know I&#8217;m far from being perfect or an expert in this matter!</p>
<p>Please feel free to correct me again if you think I made more mistakes&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
