Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

Guy Ritchie Adding Large Vegetable Gardens To UK Estate

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

guy ritchie, eco, gardens, uk

Director Guy Ritchie has submitted plans to make his $13 million English country estate more self-sufficient — at least when it comes to food. The star used to share Ashcombe House in Wiltshire, England with his ex-wife Madonna but after their divorce earlier this year he wants to make some changes.

Ritchie intends to convert flower gardens into productive vegetable plots — but first must seek permission to carry out the improvements because of the historical significance of the 18th century building.

From StarPulse:

The planning application reads, “In the estate’s prime when it was painted in the 18th Century, it was surrounded by extensive gardens including major vegetable gardens. In recent years, all productive vegetable gardens have been lost. The gardens that remain are formal or semi-formal flower gardens.

“It is proposed to try to make Ashcombe House self-sufficient. The part-walled gardens leading from the back door to the staff building will be turned over to vegetables and given a row of greenhouses to produce vines, fruit, early vegetables and seedlings… Produce from the greenhouses will be used on the estate, all part of an effort to make the estate more self-sufficient and sustainable.”

How ironic that it’s Madonna who shows up in “Greenest Star” lists (something we’ve debunked time and time again) — but it’s her ex that really has the green thumb? We hope Ritchie gets the permission to go ahead with his “veggie” renovations — something that appears to be all the rage in the UK right now.

Like us on Facebook:
0 Comments

Collaborating with animal exploiters won’t help animals

The two sides claim to both have the “health and well-being of animals” in mind in this partnership, but one likely said “after profitability” under their breath.

Exploitation for art is no worse than exploitation for dinner

It always seems to come back to a confused juror deciding when animal use is justified.

Humane Society Serves Pork to Save Dogs…WTF?!

All animals matter morally, equally.