Ending world hunger by aiding foreign countries with food is not green at all. The “green” movement relies on sustainability. It is not sustainable to give food to nations that can’t provide it for themselves. Food means more living which means more breeding and more sustaining of future generations who still can’t feed themselves alone. Our meddling in the business of underdeveloped nations to be oh so munificent as to provide them with life (food) only ensures the need for further and more extensive outside aid due to the population growth we’re sustaining the progression of. Just giving food to simply “end world hunger” is extremely foolish and only results in more life that needs more help. It does nations no favor to not allow them to manage their population and gain their own independence and functionability over time. If developed nations really want to help, they can send people to teach peoples of underdeveloped countries how to grow their own food or educate on the most efficient hunting and gathering or plan for a reasonably sized population. We can help kick-start indigenous people’s businesses and send chances for education, specifically health and sex education. “Ending world hunger” is the dumbest, most counter-productive “philantrhopic” cause ever.