Comments on: Heather Mills’ New Be@One Green Fashion Line Debuts To Poor Reviews

By: Zoe

Zoe — Wed, 04 Aug 2010 02:05:27 +0000

I love Mills and I think it is noble that an attempt was made at recycling materials that would like have been trashed anyway. Bravo!

By: Rene

Rene — Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:03:54 +0000

I have never been a big fan of Heather Mills, but I actually did not think the Green Fashion Line was all that bad. I have seen a lot worse from these so called designers. Just the other day on E I seen this one sleeve dress made by Brian Lichtenberg that looked down right sick. I have no idea how some girls think they can pull this stuff off.

By: Veronika

Veronika — Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:44:54 +0000

IceClass, I agree with you 100%.

By: Jane

Jane — Sat, 05 Sep 2009 01:59:49 +0000

It’s always about Heather. The sun rises and sets on her, and she’s not above trying to destroy people who get in her way.

By: Issue 271 « FiFi

Issue 271 « FiFi — Fri, 04 Sep 2009 03:55:14 +0000

[...] Heather Mills’ has a new fashion collection Be@One. Oh god! ..”laughably horrid” is not something you want to hear . Some of these outfits scream “Austin Powers couture” Ecorazzi [...]

By: Time for another Infrequent Internet Roundup « The Vegan Shoe Lady

Time for another Infrequent Internet Roundup « The Vegan Shoe Lady — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:10:31 +0000

[...] Mills is living proof of why design training and education is so important to aspiring designers. (I appreciate [...]

By: Anne

Anne — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 01:58:42 +0000

I’m not impressed in the least. I really dislike it when people use the GREEN label to promote themselves.

To be fair, Heather has done other noble things for amputees, so she deserves to be admired for that.

By: Phoenix225

Phoenix225 — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:06:50 +0000

Forgot to mention — the only angle that would make what Mills is doing unique and/or truly eco-friendly would be if she went to the landfills, themselves, and salvaged garments already there… There is nothing either noble or socially helpful in what she is doing here… But, of course, go to her website and listen to her herald her ridiculous ploys as the incredible successes none of them are… No matter what the critics say, on her website, EVERYTHING she does is a glowing success… Ummmmm, not true even a little…

By: Phoenix225

Phoenix225 — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:29:07 +0000

Welcome to the mastery of Heather Mills… What is helpful or eco-friendly about buying up entire lots of recycleable clothing items that are decent and priced well for the less fortunate who need them? In their original form, they are sellable via this means — they are sellable, or they wouldn’t be being offered in the first place in these establishments… She is using extablishments that are ALREADY DOING what she’s claiming to be doing — recycling decent clothing, but at very decent prices, so that these garments do NOT end up in a landfill when there are people who need and want them…

So, Heather, then, takes these bargain garments (that are desperately needed by those w. limited $$), cuts and slices them up to shreads — patches them on to each other in hideous fashion, and charges lots of money for them… Huh? Isn’t she single-handedly UNDOING the principle she is claiming to support? Not only this, but, what are they doing with all the garment scraps they are creating (that weren’t there before)? Hmmmmm — I’m guessing a landfill — a landfill where, now, both her scraps AND these hideous garments will all end up when, if left in their original forms at their original locations, likely would have been purchased and worn, thereby, furthering this needed service? Such a brilliant mind! And, people fall for this crap from her! LOL

By: Christine

Christine — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:14:07 +0000

Ice”Class”:

I believe you left out a few adjectives from your ode to fur.

A more accurate description would read: “hideously cruel, product of unthinkable suffering (including electrocution and neck breaking,although most animals are skinned alive).”

As to your point about fur being green…well that’s just total nonesense. See, http://www.crueltyisnotgreen.com/

http://www.furisdead.com/feat-notgreen.asp

Even if it were green, which it is not, the cruelty inherently involved in the production of fur could NEVER be justified by its alleged environmental benefits.