In Sigg’s defense, they never touted that their cans were BPA free. They said their bottles did not LEAK BPA into the contents.

However, companies selling organic foods like Muir Glenn still defend their right to use BPA in their cans.

Why are we rallying against a company who has come out of the woods, so-to-speak, and has designed and manufactured an alternative finally, when there are companies like Muir Glen, Campbells and the like who are selling products to use with BPA leached into them? THis type of reaction we are having here is more likely to keep these other companies behind the veil of excuses rather than doing the right thing, exposing themselves and making changes. Our reactions are being made note of by these companies.

Sigg is finally doing the right thing. There are hundreds of Sigg knock offs that are still on the market. No one is talking about them. Sigg did the right thing.

And if you did your research, you’d realize that they never stated their bottles were BPA-free.

I’m not saying we all haven’t been mislead in some way. But we do have to take a look at the big picture here. We are crucifying a company for trying to finally do the right thing. In the meantime, pretty much all canned goods, and even jarred goods have BPA in their liners. Even if we can our own tomatoes, do you know that Ball jars have BPA in their lids? Cuisine Art does not make a single food container made without BPA!? And do you know why? Because, as an x-employee told me, there was not enough concern from the general public (no emails, letters, phone calls) to support a change in product.

Guys, take a look at the big picture here!