<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pamela Anderson&#8217;s Stripping PETA Ad Banned From Airports</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/09/09/pamela-andersons-stripping-peta-ad-banned-from-airports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/09/09/pamela-andersons-stripping-peta-ad-banned-from-airports/</link>
	<description>Causes Entertainment Lifestyle Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ketchfish</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/09/09/pamela-andersons-stripping-peta-ad-banned-from-airports/comment-page-1/#comment-370490</link>
		<dc:creator>ketchfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=19902#comment-370490</guid>
		<description>Cute ad.  I raised 6 kids and wouldn&#039;t have had any problem discussing a couple bared bottoms it to them.  That said, I will continue to hunt, fish, eat meat, wear leather and fur, etc.  It didn&#039;t have any effect on my opinions choices.  I won&#039;t bother stating my arguments as no one reading them here is likely to be changed, and you know what?  You don&#039;t have to.

I just figured I&#039;d post an opinion on the ad from the other side of the issue. Keep making them, keep talking, it&#039;s a free country and you&#039;ve got every right to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cute ad.  I raised 6 kids and wouldn&#8217;t have had any problem discussing a couple bared bottoms it to them.  That said, I will continue to hunt, fish, eat meat, wear leather and fur, etc.  It didn&#8217;t have any effect on my opinions choices.  I won&#8217;t bother stating my arguments as no one reading them here is likely to be changed, and you know what?  You don&#8217;t have to.</p>
<p>I just figured I&#8217;d post an opinion on the ad from the other side of the issue. Keep making them, keep talking, it&#8217;s a free country and you&#8217;ve got every right to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: herwin</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/09/09/pamela-andersons-stripping-peta-ad-banned-from-airports/comment-page-1/#comment-369353</link>
		<dc:creator>herwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=19902#comment-369353</guid>
		<description>karmalily and whoever, there are lots of Peta ads with guys and without nudity and promoting animal rights from a nudity-free different angle. For some reason many people are focused (or &quot;obsessed&quot; ?) with nudity  that they mentally block out all the other adds from Peta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>karmalily and whoever, there are lots of Peta ads with guys and without nudity and promoting animal rights from a nudity-free different angle. For some reason many people are focused (or &#8220;obsessed&#8221; ?) with nudity  that they mentally block out all the other adds from Peta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karmalily</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/09/09/pamela-andersons-stripping-peta-ad-banned-from-airports/comment-page-1/#comment-369343</link>
		<dc:creator>karmalily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=19902#comment-369343</guid>
		<description>There is nothing at all wrong with nudity - however, PETA&#039;s repeated use of conventionally beautiful naked or almost-naked women to get attention is horribly sexist. At least feature different body types if you absolutely have to use nudity. I can&#039;t even remember the last time I saw a PETA ad that didn&#039;t feature sex in some way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing at all wrong with nudity &#8211; however, PETA&#8217;s repeated use of conventionally beautiful naked or almost-naked women to get attention is horribly sexist. At least feature different body types if you absolutely have to use nudity. I can&#8217;t even remember the last time I saw a PETA ad that didn&#8217;t feature sex in some way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StarTits</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/09/09/pamela-andersons-stripping-peta-ad-banned-from-airports/comment-page-1/#comment-369186</link>
		<dc:creator>StarTits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=19902#comment-369186</guid>
		<description>Always good to see some nice T&amp;A.  That&#039;s what women are best at.  Bravo to PETA for bringing us more p0rn.  I would have like to see some leather whips though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always good to see some nice T&amp;A.  That&#8217;s what women are best at.  Bravo to PETA for bringing us more p0rn.  I would have like to see some leather whips though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PETER</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/09/09/pamela-andersons-stripping-peta-ad-banned-from-airports/comment-page-1/#comment-369185</link>
		<dc:creator>PETER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=19902#comment-369185</guid>
		<description>NO MATTER WHAT ..CRUELTY TO ANIMALS IN ANY FORM MUST END...
I&#039;M WITH PETA AND ALL ANIMAL RIGHT GROUPS..GOD BLESS THEM..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO MATTER WHAT ..CRUELTY TO ANIMALS IN ANY FORM MUST END&#8230;<br />
I&#8217;M WITH PETA AND ALL ANIMAL RIGHT GROUPS..GOD BLESS THEM..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/09/09/pamela-andersons-stripping-peta-ad-banned-from-airports/comment-page-1/#comment-369169</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=19902#comment-369169</guid>
		<description>This is the reason people do not take animal rights seriously. I love animals but hate PETA!!!!!!! Stick to the facts morons</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the reason people do not take animal rights seriously. I love animals but hate PETA!!!!!!! Stick to the facts morons</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/09/09/pamela-andersons-stripping-peta-ad-banned-from-airports/comment-page-1/#comment-369155</link>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=19902#comment-369155</guid>
		<description>PETA sucks!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PETA sucks!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/09/09/pamela-andersons-stripping-peta-ad-banned-from-airports/comment-page-1/#comment-368904</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=19902#comment-368904</guid>
		<description>Ugh. I really didn&#039;t want to see Pamela Anderson do that.

Really though. PETA&#039;s a one trick pony. YAH NAKED EX-CELEBS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh. I really didn&#8217;t want to see Pamela Anderson do that.</p>
<p>Really though. PETA&#8217;s a one trick pony. YAH NAKED EX-CELEBS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lucy</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/09/09/pamela-andersons-stripping-peta-ad-banned-from-airports/comment-page-1/#comment-368888</link>
		<dc:creator>lucy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=19902#comment-368888</guid>
		<description>Hahaha, I like it!
People, stop complaining. Yes, I know Peta has some strange ways of getting points across. But if it works, why not? If it makes a few people stop wearing fur or not eat meat, then I don&#039;t see what the problem is. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahaha, I like it!<br />
People, stop complaining. Yes, I know Peta has some strange ways of getting points across. But if it works, why not? If it makes a few people stop wearing fur or not eat meat, then I don&#8217;t see what the problem is. <img src='http://www.ecorazzi.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whoever...</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/09/09/pamela-andersons-stripping-peta-ad-banned-from-airports/comment-page-1/#comment-368772</link>
		<dc:creator>Whoever...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=19902#comment-368772</guid>
		<description>Okay, maybe it&#039;s a little tiresome to see Peta constantly using nudity in their ads.
I mean, can&#039;t they come up with something different already?

However, this ad is very well done and besides it&#039;s not focused on nudity.

Regarding CNN being worried that kids might see the ad, maybe they should stop being such hypocritical puritans (Merriam Webster on-line: 2. one who practices or preaches a more rigorous or professedly purer moral code than that which prevails).

Why doesn&#039;t anyone complaint about the Hollywood films that have nudity, violence and swearing...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, maybe it&#8217;s a little tiresome to see Peta constantly using nudity in their ads.<br />
I mean, can&#8217;t they come up with something different already?</p>
<p>However, this ad is very well done and besides it&#8217;s not focused on nudity.</p>
<p>Regarding CNN being worried that kids might see the ad, maybe they should stop being such hypocritical puritans (Merriam Webster on-line: 2. one who practices or preaches a more rigorous or professedly purer moral code than that which prevails).</p>
<p>Why doesn&#8217;t anyone complaint about the Hollywood films that have nudity, violence and swearing&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

