<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Valentine&#8217;s Flick Is Apparently Very Green</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/11/01/valentines-flick-is-apparently-very-green/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/11/01/valentines-flick-is-apparently-very-green/</link>
	<description>Causes Entertainment Lifestyle Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valentines Day: Most Greenest Production to Date — Lifescape Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/11/01/valentines-flick-is-apparently-very-green/comment-page-1/#comment-392756</link>
		<dc:creator>Valentines Day: Most Greenest Production to Date — Lifescape Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=21654#comment-392756</guid>
		<description>[...] View Source: http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/11/01/valentines-flick-is-apparently-very-green/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] View Source: <a href="http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/11/01/valentines-flick-is-apparently-very-green/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/11/01/valentines-flick-is-apparently-very-green/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valentine’s Flick Is Apparently Very Green &#171; Pure Power Distribution</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/11/01/valentines-flick-is-apparently-very-green/comment-page-1/#comment-390263</link>
		<dc:creator>Valentine’s Flick Is Apparently Very Green &#171; Pure Power Distribution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=21654#comment-390263</guid>
		<description>[...] See on Ecorazzi: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See on Ecorazzi: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/11/01/valentines-flick-is-apparently-very-green/comment-page-1/#comment-389527</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=21654#comment-389527</guid>
		<description>Judging by the trailer, being green is the only thing this movie has going for it. Non-existence of this film, however, would have been even more green, and I don&#039;t think it would have been much of a cinematic loss. I do like the idea of really bad movies trying to minimize their carbon footprint out of guilt, as if truly good films can justify the environmental cost, but junk like Valentine&#039;s Day cannot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judging by the trailer, being green is the only thing this movie has going for it. Non-existence of this film, however, would have been even more green, and I don&#8217;t think it would have been much of a cinematic loss. I do like the idea of really bad movies trying to minimize their carbon footprint out of guilt, as if truly good films can justify the environmental cost, but junk like Valentine&#8217;s Day cannot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

