<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Al Gore: World&#8217;s First Carbon Billionaire?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/11/03/al-gore-worlds-first-carbon-billionaire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/11/03/al-gore-worlds-first-carbon-billionaire/</link>
	<description>Causes Entertainment Lifestyle Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: db</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/11/03/al-gore-worlds-first-carbon-billionaire/comment-page-1/#comment-393392</link>
		<dc:creator>db</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=21714#comment-393392</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused by Christine&#039;s venom here -- &quot;In his second ‘environmental’ publication, Gore still fails to point out the devastatingly huge meat-global warming connection (#1 cause of global warming!!!) Unbelievably irresponsible and disingenuous.&quot;

Because I&#039;m looking at Gore&#039;s Our Choice and he goes into the meat issue in particular -- both livestock agriculture&#039;s impact on the atmosphere and the environment, and the health consequences of a meat-intensive diet. 

Should I assume that no one has actually paid attention to his arguments, and just hates him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused by Christine&#8217;s venom here &#8212; &#8220;In his second ‘environmental’ publication, Gore still fails to point out the devastatingly huge meat-global warming connection (#1 cause of global warming!!!) Unbelievably irresponsible and disingenuous.&#8221;</p>
<p>Because I&#8217;m looking at Gore&#8217;s Our Choice and he goes into the meat issue in particular &#8212; both livestock agriculture&#8217;s impact on the atmosphere and the environment, and the health consequences of a meat-intensive diet. </p>
<p>Should I assume that no one has actually paid attention to his arguments, and just hates him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kirk</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/11/03/al-gore-worlds-first-carbon-billionaire/comment-page-1/#comment-391110</link>
		<dc:creator>kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=21714#comment-391110</guid>
		<description>&quot;All the money&quot; Mike?  Really Mike, &quot;all the money&quot;?

From wiki - Gore&#039;s documentary An Inconvenient Truth announced in August 2006 that it would donate 5% of all box office receipts to the Alliance.  

So 5% is now considered 100% Mike?
You&#039;ve exposed yourself with a little twisting of the facts. It&#039;s ok, I&#039;m sure you were mislead.  As far as the accuracy of YOUR articles, that is up for judgment.

The Alliance for Climate Protection is an organization founded in the United States in 2006 aiming to &quot;persuade people of the importance, urgency and feasibility of adopting and implementing effective and comprehensive solutions for the climate crisis&quot;. (WTF) The founder and current chairman of the alliance is former US Vice President Al Gore.

Many times (unfortunately) non-profits are a way to avoid paying taxes.  I have a friend who does just that.  He says; &quot;more governmental paperwork = more money I get to keep&quot;.  Ok Michael, another question, what would happen if Al Gore would shut down &quot;His&quot; non-profit?  Where would all his monetary donations (investments) go?  What is the purpose of his non-profit?  Does it directly help people?  Does it promote businesses which he has a vested interest in?
Besides the name of his new book has a big question within the title- &quot;Our Choice&quot;.  who is this &quot;our&quot;? Clearly not my choice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;All the money&#8221; Mike?  Really Mike, &#8220;all the money&#8221;?</p>
<p>From wiki &#8211; Gore&#8217;s documentary An Inconvenient Truth announced in August 2006 that it would donate 5% of all box office receipts to the Alliance.  </p>
<p>So 5% is now considered 100% Mike?<br />
You&#8217;ve exposed yourself with a little twisting of the facts. It&#8217;s ok, I&#8217;m sure you were mislead.  As far as the accuracy of YOUR articles, that is up for judgment.</p>
<p>The Alliance for Climate Protection is an organization founded in the United States in 2006 aiming to &#8220;persuade people of the importance, urgency and feasibility of adopting and implementing effective and comprehensive solutions for the climate crisis&#8221;. (WTF) The founder and current chairman of the alliance is former US Vice President Al Gore.</p>
<p>Many times (unfortunately) non-profits are a way to avoid paying taxes.  I have a friend who does just that.  He says; &#8220;more governmental paperwork = more money I get to keep&#8221;.  Ok Michael, another question, what would happen if Al Gore would shut down &#8220;His&#8221; non-profit?  Where would all his monetary donations (investments) go?  What is the purpose of his non-profit?  Does it directly help people?  Does it promote businesses which he has a vested interest in?<br />
Besides the name of his new book has a big question within the title- &#8220;Our Choice&#8221;.  who is this &#8220;our&#8221;? Clearly not my choice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kirk</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/11/03/al-gore-worlds-first-carbon-billionaire/comment-page-1/#comment-391097</link>
		<dc:creator>kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=21714#comment-391097</guid>
		<description>Is everybody posting in defense of global warming under 25 years old. Or, do they have the memory of a gold fish? (approximately 2 minutes) Same scam, different decade!  What a psychological conundrum. 

It&#039;s funny that they keep referring back to the 1970&#039;s, when by their own accounts arctic ice was at it&#039;s highest levels ever on record. Time Magazine in 1976 claimed the planet was headed into a &quot;ice age&quot; because of &quot;global cooling&quot;. So by that account, arctic ice was at a extremely high level. So with that said, they are using a flawed control or base line for data comparison. Here is a great collection of global cooling theories by some of the SAME &quot;wackos&quot; in the 1970&#039;s. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling 

Also as far as the credibility Mark Serreze, let watch as I show you how this guy theories have already been proven wrong. On April 27, 2008, ABC published a story featuring several statements made by Mr. Serreze. Here is one of those statements: &quot;There is this thin first-year ice even at the North Pole at the moment,&quot; says Serreze. &quot;This raises the spectre – the possibility that you could become ice free at the North Pole this year.&quot; That was a year in a half ago. Apparently, &quot;Ice free by the end of this year&quot;, is now &quot;Ice free sometime in the next few decades&quot; There’s one example of hypocrisy. Do you need more? It&#039;s jacka**es like this that love attention, even if it&#039;s spewing comments that promote fear amongst the masses! Al gore is no different. Besides, fear can be, and is profitable to them. 

Now if we are to believe these men, than we should still believe George W Bush and assume there are still &quot;weapons of mass destruction&quot; in Iraq. HA! 

So out the window, Mark Serreze&#039;s credibility goes. What other fraud do you have? 

Little history for ya: between 1000A.D and 1350A.D. the Vikings colonized Greenland. Remember-they named it Greenland because it was green! 

Last month (October) The U.S. experienced this. http://climvis.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/cag3/state-map-display.pl 3rd coldest on record. Funny how this data eluded NOAA&#039;s Home Page of their web site. Instead we see stories about September being unusually warm. Hey NOAA, what about June, July, and August being &quot;Unusually&quot; cold in the northern hemisphere?  Are we support to overlook this?
Is NOAA also agenda driven? 
Al Gore loves to quote NOAA&#039;s climate change data, but not these data set showing cooling?
What triggers the melting of the poles in the first place is clearly an increase in temperature, but what causes the temperature to increase? For that answer, we go to hypothesis and theory.  
This monster is HUGE people. Don&#039;t allow yourselves to be spoon fed poison! Be a individual and think for yourself!
------------------------------------------------ 
&quot;MEN OCCASIONALLY STUMBLE OVER THE TRUTH, BUT MOST OF THEM PICK THEMSELVES UP AND HURRY OFF AS IF NOTHING EVER HAPPENED.&quot; WINSTON CHURCHILL 

&quot;Ya people will ignore facts, especially when driven by money. Just look at the collapse of the banking, housing, and automotive industries.&quot; Kirk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is everybody posting in defense of global warming under 25 years old. Or, do they have the memory of a gold fish? (approximately 2 minutes) Same scam, different decade!  What a psychological conundrum. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny that they keep referring back to the 1970&#8242;s, when by their own accounts arctic ice was at it&#8217;s highest levels ever on record. Time Magazine in 1976 claimed the planet was headed into a &#8220;ice age&#8221; because of &#8220;global cooling&#8221;. So by that account, arctic ice was at a extremely high level. So with that said, they are using a flawed control or base line for data comparison. Here is a great collection of global cooling theories by some of the SAME &#8220;wackos&#8221; in the 1970&#8242;s. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling</a> </p>
<p>Also as far as the credibility Mark Serreze, let watch as I show you how this guy theories have already been proven wrong. On April 27, 2008, ABC published a story featuring several statements made by Mr. Serreze. Here is one of those statements: &#8220;There is this thin first-year ice even at the North Pole at the moment,&#8221; says Serreze. &#8220;This raises the spectre – the possibility that you could become ice free at the North Pole this year.&#8221; That was a year in a half ago. Apparently, &#8220;Ice free by the end of this year&#8221;, is now &#8220;Ice free sometime in the next few decades&#8221; There’s one example of hypocrisy. Do you need more? It&#8217;s jacka**es like this that love attention, even if it&#8217;s spewing comments that promote fear amongst the masses! Al gore is no different. Besides, fear can be, and is profitable to them. </p>
<p>Now if we are to believe these men, than we should still believe George W Bush and assume there are still &#8220;weapons of mass destruction&#8221; in Iraq. HA! </p>
<p>So out the window, Mark Serreze&#8217;s credibility goes. What other fraud do you have? </p>
<p>Little history for ya: between 1000A.D and 1350A.D. the Vikings colonized Greenland. Remember-they named it Greenland because it was green! </p>
<p>Last month (October) The U.S. experienced this. <a href="http://climvis.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/cag3/state-map-display.pl" rel="nofollow">http://climvis.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/cag3/state-map-display.pl</a> 3rd coldest on record. Funny how this data eluded NOAA&#8217;s Home Page of their web site. Instead we see stories about September being unusually warm. Hey NOAA, what about June, July, and August being &#8220;Unusually&#8221; cold in the northern hemisphere?  Are we support to overlook this?<br />
Is NOAA also agenda driven?<br />
Al Gore loves to quote NOAA&#8217;s climate change data, but not these data set showing cooling?<br />
What triggers the melting of the poles in the first place is clearly an increase in temperature, but what causes the temperature to increase? For that answer, we go to hypothesis and theory.<br />
This monster is HUGE people. Don&#8217;t allow yourselves to be spoon fed poison! Be a individual and think for yourself!<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
&#8220;MEN OCCASIONALLY STUMBLE OVER THE TRUTH, BUT MOST OF THEM PICK THEMSELVES UP AND HURRY OFF AS IF NOTHING EVER HAPPENED.&#8221; WINSTON CHURCHILL </p>
<p>&#8220;Ya people will ignore facts, especially when driven by money. Just look at the collapse of the banking, housing, and automotive industries.&#8221; Kirk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: herwin</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/11/03/al-gore-worlds-first-carbon-billionaire/comment-page-1/#comment-390915</link>
		<dc:creator>herwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=21714#comment-390915</guid>
		<description>hello mr Kirk, as you suggested i visited the NSIDC.
http://nsidc.org/news/press/20091005_minimumpr.html
here is a nice quote from NSIDC Lead Scientist Ted Scambos : “A lot of people are going to look at that graph of ice extent and think that we&#039;ve turned the corner on climate change. But the underlying conditions are still very worrisome.” 
and NSIDC Director and Senior Scientist Mark Serreze said, “It’s nice to see a little recovery over the past couple years, but there’s no reason to think that we’re headed back to conditions seen back in the 1970s. We still expect to see ice-free summers sometime in the next few decades.” 
in other words, a little bit recovery the last years from the very worst years before, but still in a few decades there will be ice free summers on the arctic. info all coming from your own recommended source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello mr Kirk, as you suggested i visited the NSIDC.<br />
<a href="http://nsidc.org/news/press/20091005_minimumpr.html" rel="nofollow">http://nsidc.org/news/press/20091005_minimumpr.html</a><br />
here is a nice quote from NSIDC Lead Scientist Ted Scambos : “A lot of people are going to look at that graph of ice extent and think that we&#8217;ve turned the corner on climate change. But the underlying conditions are still very worrisome.”<br />
and NSIDC Director and Senior Scientist Mark Serreze said, “It’s nice to see a little recovery over the past couple years, but there’s no reason to think that we’re headed back to conditions seen back in the 1970s. We still expect to see ice-free summers sometime in the next few decades.”<br />
in other words, a little bit recovery the last years from the very worst years before, but still in a few decades there will be ice free summers on the arctic. info all coming from your own recommended source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ppw</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/11/03/al-gore-worlds-first-carbon-billionaire/comment-page-1/#comment-390912</link>
		<dc:creator>ppw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=21714#comment-390912</guid>
		<description>Right so you are using Walter Russell as an arguments against nuclear power?  Really have you actually read his theories on light, complete refuted with physics today.  Walter Russell&#039;s work in physics is of no significance today.  Also you do realize that nuclear physics only started to be developed in the 1920&#039;s, the first nuclear reactor did not start up until December 2, 1942.  Right so you are going to use a book, written by a crack pot, 20 years before the first nuclear reactor was created as evidence that nuclear is bad...

What are you talking about when you say &#039;Organic life cannot co-exist with the nuclear elements&#039;?  You do realize right now radiation is being created in your stomach from the decaying of organic material.  During the course of a year the does of radiation that an American receives from naturally occurring Radon gas is 1000x more than what they would receive if they lived in a nuclear power plant for a year.  Finally all elements are radioactive, in fact life depends on this fact.

&#039;England are still not permitted to sell their produce or meat since the Chernobyl disaster even today.&#039;  Actually they do produce meat, though they have had bans, but these have nothing to do with Chernobyl.  You have heard of something called &#039;mad cow&#039; and &#039;foot and mouth disease&#039;.

Perhaps you should read a book by some modern scientist, not pseudo-scientists from the early 20th century, who actually publish articles in peer reviewed journals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right so you are using Walter Russell as an arguments against nuclear power?  Really have you actually read his theories on light, complete refuted with physics today.  Walter Russell&#8217;s work in physics is of no significance today.  Also you do realize that nuclear physics only started to be developed in the 1920&#8242;s, the first nuclear reactor did not start up until December 2, 1942.  Right so you are going to use a book, written by a crack pot, 20 years before the first nuclear reactor was created as evidence that nuclear is bad&#8230;</p>
<p>What are you talking about when you say &#8216;Organic life cannot co-exist with the nuclear elements&#8217;?  You do realize right now radiation is being created in your stomach from the decaying of organic material.  During the course of a year the does of radiation that an American receives from naturally occurring Radon gas is 1000x more than what they would receive if they lived in a nuclear power plant for a year.  Finally all elements are radioactive, in fact life depends on this fact.</p>
<p>&#8216;England are still not permitted to sell their produce or meat since the Chernobyl disaster even today.&#8217;  Actually they do produce meat, though they have had bans, but these have nothing to do with Chernobyl.  You have heard of something called &#8216;mad cow&#8217; and &#8216;foot and mouth disease&#8217;.</p>
<p>Perhaps you should read a book by some modern scientist, not pseudo-scientists from the early 20th century, who actually publish articles in peer reviewed journals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael d&#39;Estries</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/11/03/al-gore-worlds-first-carbon-billionaire/comment-page-1/#comment-390797</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael d&#39;Estries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 01:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=21714#comment-390797</guid>
		<description>Kirk,

All the money from his first book, &quot;An Inconvenient Truth&quot;, as well as the movie, and any prize cash from things (like the Nobel Peace Prize) have gone straight into his non-profit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kirk,</p>
<p>All the money from his first book, &#8220;An Inconvenient Truth&#8221;, as well as the movie, and any prize cash from things (like the Nobel Peace Prize) have gone straight into his non-profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KIRK</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/11/03/al-gore-worlds-first-carbon-billionaire/comment-page-1/#comment-390739</link>
		<dc:creator>KIRK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=21714#comment-390739</guid>
		<description>Someone that &quot;truly believes&quot; in a cause, should give some of their &quot;own money&quot; to that cause.  Up to this point, this is the first (donation of his own money) I&#039;ve heard of.  Perhaps I&#039;m wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone that &#8220;truly believes&#8221; in a cause, should give some of their &#8220;own money&#8221; to that cause.  Up to this point, this is the first (donation of his own money) I&#8217;ve heard of.  Perhaps I&#8217;m wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KIRK</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/11/03/al-gore-worlds-first-carbon-billionaire/comment-page-1/#comment-390729</link>
		<dc:creator>KIRK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=21714#comment-390729</guid>
		<description>Al Gore will not debate anyone on his data(theories).  Has anyone seen Al gore&#039;s address to the Society of Environmental Journalists in Madison, Wisconsin?  A Journalist by the name Phelim McAleer, the director of Not Evil Just Wrong, asked Al Gore about the British Court Case which found his documentary An Inconvenient Truth had nine significant errors.  McAleer said that given his documentary is being shown in schools – does he accept the errors and has he done anything to correct them?  They cut the mic of a fellow journalist (Phelim McAleer). 
link - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jqcnBugnl8&amp;feature=player_embedded

Going &quot;green&quot; has made him a cool 100 million or so in the past 9 years! 
Al Gore is a fraud, and he&#039;s trying to protect his and the UN&#039;s fraudulent industry!  

Anyone ever been to the (NSIDC) National Snow and Ice Data Center&#039;s website? I encourage all to visit. Al gore and others like him (especially Leonardo DiCaprio) previously used their data as if it were gospel.  
This is some of their most current news from their site -  
Sea ice extent averaged over October 2009 was 7.50 square kilometers (2.90 square miles). This was 1.79 million square kilometers (691,000 square miles) below the 1979 to 2000 mean for October, but 730,000 square kilometers (282,000 square miles) above the record low for the month, which occurred in October 2007.

Ya, thats right people, The arctic ice has increased in the last two years. Also ocean temperatures have decreased (allowing less hurricanes. How does Al respond to this data?  As you may have guessed, he won&#039;t acknowledge it.  

It&#039;s all about Money and control!  Don&#039;t let these hypocrites take your freedom to prosper while getting rich.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al Gore will not debate anyone on his data(theories).  Has anyone seen Al gore&#8217;s address to the Society of Environmental Journalists in Madison, Wisconsin?  A Journalist by the name Phelim McAleer, the director of Not Evil Just Wrong, asked Al Gore about the British Court Case which found his documentary An Inconvenient Truth had nine significant errors.  McAleer said that given his documentary is being shown in schools – does he accept the errors and has he done anything to correct them?  They cut the mic of a fellow journalist (Phelim McAleer).<br />
link &#8211; <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jqcnBugnl8&#038;feature=player_embedded" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jqcnBugnl8&#038;feature=player_embedded</a></p>
<p>Going &#8220;green&#8221; has made him a cool 100 million or so in the past 9 years!<br />
Al Gore is a fraud, and he&#8217;s trying to protect his and the UN&#8217;s fraudulent industry!  </p>
<p>Anyone ever been to the (NSIDC) National Snow and Ice Data Center&#8217;s website? I encourage all to visit. Al gore and others like him (especially Leonardo DiCaprio) previously used their data as if it were gospel.<br />
This is some of their most current news from their site &#8211;<br />
Sea ice extent averaged over October 2009 was 7.50 square kilometers (2.90 square miles). This was 1.79 million square kilometers (691,000 square miles) below the 1979 to 2000 mean for October, but 730,000 square kilometers (282,000 square miles) above the record low for the month, which occurred in October 2007.</p>
<p>Ya, thats right people, The arctic ice has increased in the last two years. Also ocean temperatures have decreased (allowing less hurricanes. How does Al respond to this data?  As you may have guessed, he won&#8217;t acknowledge it.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s all about Money and control!  Don&#8217;t let these hypocrites take your freedom to prosper while getting rich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jory</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/11/03/al-gore-worlds-first-carbon-billionaire/comment-page-1/#comment-390677</link>
		<dc:creator>jory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=21714#comment-390677</guid>
		<description>What facts are missing in that he is not vegan? Does not mention that the number one cause of &#039;global warning&#039; is the livestock industry?  Will not answer Peta&#039;s question about why he calls himself an environmentalist while ignoring the &#039;inconvenient truth&#039; that anyone who cares should go veg?  Why stuffing his face with decomposing body parts and fluids of suffering and tortured animals is more important to him... 

Al Gore is a disgrace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What facts are missing in that he is not vegan? Does not mention that the number one cause of &#8216;global warning&#8217; is the livestock industry?  Will not answer Peta&#8217;s question about why he calls himself an environmentalist while ignoring the &#8216;inconvenient truth&#8217; that anyone who cares should go veg?  Why stuffing his face with decomposing body parts and fluids of suffering and tortured animals is more important to him&#8230; </p>
<p>Al Gore is a disgrace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeanruss</title>
		<link>http://www.ecorazzi.com/2009/11/03/al-gore-worlds-first-carbon-billionaire/comment-page-1/#comment-390644</link>
		<dc:creator>jeanruss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecorazzi.com/?p=21714#comment-390644</guid>
		<description>Walter Russell, a 20th century American genius, as well as the first scientist to discover the transuranium elements back in the early 1920&#039;s, wrote a book titled &quot;Atomic Suicide&quot;. It is a chilling read by the person who knows the most about nuclear power. Organic life cannot co-exist with the nuclear elements. If we continue using it, life will disappear from this planet for thousands, possibly millions of years. The farmers in northern England are still not permitted to sell their produce or meat since the Chernobyl disaster even today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walter Russell, a 20th century American genius, as well as the first scientist to discover the transuranium elements back in the early 1920&#8242;s, wrote a book titled &#8220;Atomic Suicide&#8221;. It is a chilling read by the person who knows the most about nuclear power. Organic life cannot co-exist with the nuclear elements. If we continue using it, life will disappear from this planet for thousands, possibly millions of years. The farmers in northern England are still not permitted to sell their produce or meat since the Chernobyl disaster even today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

