so many famous people have supported and joined Peta with their many campaigns and to doubt (deny?) if these mega campaigns havent educated people worldwide and havent raised awarenes on a massive scale is naive.
Public campaigns with shocking photos of skinned animals can have a real negative effect on many people who don’t want to be unexpected confrontated with disturbing photo’s. Peta’s softer campaigns with nude famous people are much more accepted by mainstream people and through these campaigns people can visit the Peta website with photo’s, video, and information about topics like fur.

would a human rights organisation have a campaign showing children being killed ? (animal rights organisation just do that, showing animals being skinned alive)
i always get highly suspicious when people are comparing human rights topics and animal rights topics in order to trash an animal rights organisation.

Even if you diagree with Peta, which is your good right, you cannot deny that Peta has and still has an enormous positive influence.

You also cannot deny that Peta does a lot , a lot more then their I Rather Go Nude campaigns, such as exposing animal cruelty with undercover videos.
For that any serious animal rights activist cannot do anything else then aplause them.