by Michael dEstries
Categories: Film/TV.

avatar

Avatar, director James Cameron’s first film since Titanic, is now in theaters, and many in the industry are expecting it to draw the crowds this weekend — and perhaps break some records along the way. Reviews have been mainly positive for the film (Currently at 82% on Rotten Tomatoes), which Cameron says is a reflection of environmental destruction here on Earth. Others have likened it to a rehash of the classic themes from Dances with Wolves. That latter comparison led one let-down critic to declare that “Cameron’s signature achievement may have been to prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, the oldest of all Hollywood maxims: all the money in the world is no substitute for fresh ideas and a solid script.”

Still, if the “corporate bad guys vs. treehugging natives” plot may seem a bit worn, it’s the jaw-dropping visuals that others can’t stop talking about. “About 30 minutes in to the film, you realize that the marketing has undersold the movie,” writes Gizmodo’s Mark Wilson. “In an era when every great moment of a film makes its way to a trailer, Avatar surprised me with an endless amount of unparalleled optical overload. Every single shot is just so full of detail that you literally open your eyes wider to take as much in as you can before each cut.”

I’m sold. How about you? In the mood for some tall blue aliens this weekend?


Categories: Film/TV.

About Michael dEstries

Michael has been blogging since 2005 on issues such as sustainability, renewable energy, philanthropy, and healthy living. He regularly contributes to a slew of publications, as well as consulting with companies looking to make an impact using the web and social media. He lives in Ithaca, NY with his family on an apple farm.

View all posts by Michael dEstries →
  • http://uvuaac.blogspot.com/ Jorgen

    Based off the trailer, it looks like a video game to me. The CGI doesn’t look “unparalleled” in any sense. I think that Call of Duty 2 has better CGI.

    • Am

      You have to see it in motion on the big screen… There is a reason the article says that the movie has been undersold. The trailer is but a shadow of the actual movie.

  • Ken

    I agree with Jorgen. It looks frightfully similar to an X Box game. I guess with so much CGI, the filmmakers couldn’t expect to make every single scene photo-realistic.
    That said, I’ll be disappointed if this film makes more than 50 million as an opening. Yes, disappointed. The film has many “sloppy” elements, especially in its unoriginal premise. There are too many “epic” movies out there wanting to be Lord of the Rings, and audiences should be more choosy over what to see and what not to see.

    My greatest wish for the next decade of filmmaking—
    Make a 4 star drama or (gasp!) a 4 star romance film that is actually worth seeing. Forrest Gump was the last great drama and Titanic was the last great romance. Everything since the early 2000s has been warfare and hack-your-enemies-down.
    I want more variety these days.

  • Brant

    This gave me a huge headache – prepare for hours of 3D by doing this: http://www.tictacdo.com/ttd/Create-3D-Television Also, There’s no action until the end – a huge build-up for nothing. Like Titanic all over again…

  • Brant

    The 3-D effect made me want to puke – I was so dizzy

  • http://www.remyc.com Remy C.

    I saw it tonight, like everyone else I wasn’t expecting too much, because of all the snide reviews… yes the trailer was very deceiving… the reality on screen is amazing! The film has real heart and is beautiful to watch. There’s something in there for everyone. I loved it. The 3-D, which is the polarized lenses, long in use at Universal’s Terminator ride, and not the old flimsy red-blue candy wrapper type, takes 3 minutes to adjust your eyes, then after that it’s just glorious up there on the screen… We saw coming attractions for Burton’s take on Alice, and that movie will be using the same 3-D process.