Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

Do Nature Films Invade The Privacy Of Animals?

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

It goes without saying that technology has allowed nature filmmakers to peel back curtains on the lives of animals we otherwise would never be able to witness. Such stunning displays, as witnessed in Discovery’s LIFE or Disneynature’s OCEANS, are incredible reminders of the lives all around us — and the wonder of nature itself.

Not so fast, says Dr Brett Mills, a senior lecturer at the University of East Anglia. In a new published work, Mills argues that its wrong for broadcasters to treat all creatures as “fair game” and to fail to consider their right to privacy before recording. “The question constantly posed by wildlife documentaries is how animals should be filmed, they never ask whether animals should be filmed at all,” said Mills in an interview. “There are many activities which animals engage in which are common to wildlife documentary stories but which are rendered extremely private in the human realm.”

Mills then goes on to state that death, mating, and giving birth remain “largely absent” from broadcasting when it comes to humans — though we have to wonder if the guy has ever turned on a television or surfed the web.

Others are calling Mill’s claims “coo-coo” simply because “consent to film” from animals is just silly. “How can you say whether an animal wants to filmed? No animal will understand the concept,” said filmmaker Piers Warren.

PETA was also brought into the debate, telling the UK Telegraph that documentaries actually help us better protect our natural world. “Wildlife documentaries can play an important role in increasing people’s awareness and understanding of the many amazing species sharing our planet,” a rep said. “If the animals aren’t distressed when they’re being filmed then, to use a sporting metaphor, we say, ‘No harm, no foul’.”

via UK Telegraph

Like us on Facebook:

Vegans who campaign against fur are upset that Aritzia is using fake fur but real down

You know how we won’t shut up about how ineffective single issue campaigns are, including the ones against fur?


LA schools fuck up, reintroduce flavoured milk as a healthy option

Cafeterias have become pilot programs for whether or not strawberry and chocolate milk is the way to make more money on our youth.


Dallas is afraid of a little vegan brisket

Uh oh Dallas, have you been shown that you don’t need animals to make a mean barbecue?