Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

'CRUDE' Director Told To Cough Up Footage For Chevron

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi


Just in case you’re not already familiar with award winning documentarian Joe Berlinger’s much buzzed about film CRUDE, it explores what to date has been the absolute largest landmark eco-lawsuit in Ecuador’s Amazon jungle at $27 billion between 30,000 native rainforest inhabitants and America’s oil conglomerate Chevron (which at the time of filming was known as Texaco).

Acquiring video footage that detailed both sides of the case throughout a three year period, Berlinger was able to highlight what happens when the never ending quest for oil blinds corporations (and oftentimes even renders them apathetic) to the human and environmental casualties left in their wake.

The Ecuadorian plaintiffs accused Chevron of destroying their stomping grounds by systematically polluting and contaminating multiple ecosystems for 30 years during their exploration of Lago Agrio oil field  (and even dumping billions of gallons of oil-polluted water back into the rainforest), triggering a comprehensive array of health ailments among the rainforest’s residents including birth defects, assorted cancers and leukemia.

Chevron had an entirely different perspective, insisting that they were not responsible for the contamination and claiming that a bribery scheme was being engaged to take advantage of their financial position.

Even though the documentary had its day in the theatres back in 2009, the dust hasn’t settled because Berlinger has now been ordered by a federal judge to furnish Chevron with 600+ hours of raw video footage that the oil giant intends to use in the hope of “pursuing an international treaty arbitration related to the lawsuit” and to potentially get the litigation dismissed.

The judge on the case explained that since the filmmaker wasn’t able to prove that he obtained confidentiality agreements with any of his interviewed subjects, there is technically no violation of First Amendment rights and Berlinger’s footage will enable Chevron to potentially achieve justice by “determining Ecuador’s violation of international law and its denial of due process and fair treatment to Chevron.”

Fellow documentarian Michael Moore is rather disturbed by this turn of events, fearing that it could detrimentally impact his craft in light of the fact that his most valuable, insightful movie moments have happened when corporate reps have been willing to reveal internal documents or highly sensitive facts which shed light on wrongdoing.

Moore says that the “chilling effect” of courts being able to subpoena documentary footage is that “the next whistleblower at the next corporation is going to think twice about showing me some documents if that information has to be turned over to the corporation that they’re working for.”

This situation is still unfolding as Berlinger’s attorneys request that the subpoena be delayed while they attempt to pursue an appeal.

Via New York Times

Like us on Facebook:

What About Zero Waste?

Going vegan must be at the heart of any environmental discussion.

Why it doesn’t matter if the Impossible burger is healthy

The Impossible burger doesn’t need to be overtly healthy – it just needs to be vegan.

France’s ban of faux-meat branding won’t stop veganism

I’ll take “mycoproteinous food tube” over a tube of dead pig any day.