Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

Brand And Perry's Wedding Ceremony May Have Violated 'Eco-Sensitive' Area

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

When reports first began surfacing about comedian Russell Brand and singer Katy Perry’s Indian wedding, everything seemed kosher. That is until we read about the noise pollution that may have violated rules of an “eco-sensitive” area in Ranthambore National Park — just miles from the ceremony location. Eco-sensitive area, you say? Ecorazzi’s on the case!

The complaints occurred shortly after the couple were married in the north Indian state of Rajasthanon on Saturday in what is being described as a traditional Hindu ceremony — complete with a Hindu priest, a specially designed mandap, and a traditional wedding scarf  to symbolize their united partnership.

While we were excited to learn that 40 of the 100 or so guests were staying at a super green desert camp, which featured an array of decked out exotic tents, we were disappointed that the duo may have violated state-mandated noise-pollution laws.

Sources claim that loud music was blaring from the resort till 2.30 am which is against the law because it disturbs the wild animals in the forest area.

Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot has appointed a four-member committee, including District Collector Ravi Kumar, to follow-up on the alleged violation.

“The officials would submit their report as soon as they find some substantial input in this regard,” said Gehlot. “I had already appointed a four-member committee to check violation of rules in the eco-sensitive area and the members visited the venue yesterday.

“It was a private event and we have nothing to do with it but the resort will be penalized if they found guilty of violation of any rule,” he added.

Somehow we think the newly wed celebrity couple won’t have any trouble paying the fine.

Like us on Facebook:


In short, the lawyers ineptly argued that pigs are not property, and then went on to argue that they are property.

The only label you need on egg cartons: exploitative

We have to recognize that the ‘free range’ campaign (and the many chicken related campaigns like it) is as frivolous as the ‘humane meat’ one.

The True Carnage of the Film “Carnage” – Part 2

It fails as education because whatever useful information it manages to convey, any benefit of this is negated by the confusion it fosters in an arena that is already beset with massive confusion.