Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

EPA Proposes Comprehensive Investigation Of 'Fracking'

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

Earlier this week we told you that Buffalo, New York put a ban on the practice of hydraulic fracturing, also known as “fracking,” and now the EPA has proposed examining every aspect of fracking in what would be the most comprehensive investigation of the drilling technique.

Fracking is used to retrieve natural gas from shale rock and involves injecting chemicals, sand, and millions of gallons of water to open up trapped gas— the EPA estimates that 70 to 140 billion gallons of water are used annually, which equals the same amount used by 2.5 million people. Aside from wasting water, the other problem is that the process risks polluting drinking water near the wells, poisoning it with dangerous, carcinogenic chemicals.

The EPA investigation will draft a plan on March 7-8, allowing for feedback from the public, after which the study will start immediately and a report should be available by the end of next year, with a full report expected by 2014.

“Our guys are and will continue to be supportive of a study approach that’s based on the science, true to its original intent and scope,” a statement from oil and gas industry group Energy in Depth said. “But at first blush, this document doesn’t appear to definitively say whether it’s an approach EPA will ultimately take.”

Part of the proposal is said to include using two to three case studies in order to follow the process of fracking wells from start to finish. The EPA would also examine three to five areas where drilling has reportedly contaminated water, including sites in Pennsylvania, Texas, Colorado, and North Dakota.

Anti-fracking movements have had a lot of celeb supporters, like Mark Ruffalo and Gasland director Josh Fox. Who else out there is anti-frack? We know we are!

Via The Huffington Post

Like us on Facebook:

Protesting Kylie Jenner’s Use of Fur Doesn’t Help Animals

Campaigns against fur, whether that’s at the PETA level or a small mobbing like this, don’t work because they promote the use of other animal products.

Collaborating with animal exploiters won’t help animals

The two sides claim to both have the “health and well-being of animals” in mind in this partnership, but one likely said “after profitability” under their breath.

Exploitation for art is no worse than exploitation for dinner

It always seems to come back to a confused juror deciding when animal use is justified.