Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

'Harry Potter' Star Emma Watson Debuts Green Fashion Line

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

Emma Watson is really becoming one of our eco-faves. She’s one of the more recent additions to the string of celebs who are launching eco-friendly clothing lines, and now her latest campaign photo for People Tree has been released (pictured)!

For the Harry Potter starlet, this latest collection— which is made entirely from organic and fair-trade materials— will be her third and final collaboration with eco-friendly fashion line People Tree.

Stemming from the idea that being green is sexy (and we couldn’t agree more!), her Spring 2011 designs will include polka dot skirts, a polka dot tea dress, striped shirts, jersey harem pants, blazers, and gorgeous draped dresses. The collection will officially go on sale February 28, but select looks are also available now at the People Tree website.

The looks are also fairly affordable, this is a UK brand, but they do ship to the U.S. And while a men’s crew-neck organic cotton shirt goes for £25.00, for women an adorable navy striped boat neck is just £28.00. And if you’re in the mood to splurge, check out the navy and gold trimmed cardigan for £130.00, or the truly sweet silk checkered dress for £95.00.

Via StyleBistro

Like us on Facebook:
0 Comments

Protesting Kylie Jenner’s Use of Fur Doesn’t Help Animals

Campaigns against fur, whether that’s at the PETA level or a small mobbing like this, don’t work because they promote the use of other animal products.

Collaborating with animal exploiters won’t help animals

The two sides claim to both have the “health and well-being of animals” in mind in this partnership, but one likely said “after profitability” under their breath.

Exploitation for art is no worse than exploitation for dinner

It always seems to come back to a confused juror deciding when animal use is justified.