Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

Birds Are First Non-Human Animals To Use Grammar

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

Better than most Youtube commentators, I bet.

When it comes to syntax, Bengal Finches know where it’s at. This particular species of bird is rather sensitive to unfamiliar bird calls — for instance, if they hear a sound they don’t recognize, they’ll reply with a burst of their own loud ’chattering’.

Kentaro Abe, a researcher at Kyoto University, began a study where he played these recordings to the finches. Eventually, the birds became so familiar with the sounds, they no longer reacted aggressively when played.

After the other songs became like second nature (get it?!) to them, he took the recordings and jumbled them four different ways. The result? The finches only reacted to one pattern of calls!

Abe believes that the three recordings that didn’t provoke a reaction followed the ‘finch rules of syntax’ — meaning, the birds still understood the ‘message’ — but the recording that did provoke the reaction must have meant something completely different to the birds, that they believed it was unlike any other call they’ve heard before.

Example:
I am cold
Cold I am
I cold am
Am I cold

If someone were to say the first three of these sentences to you, you could figure out that this person is cold. However, if someone were to say the last one to you, you wouldn’t know if they were actually cold or not (clearly because they don’t know if they’re cold or not). Hence, the meaning changes.

However, Abe has delved further into the study, and has gone as far as ‘chemically destroying’ the part of the brain that recognizes faulty grammar, the anterior nidopallium, in hopes that “further study into the anterior nidopallium will help reveal just why finches and humans alike evolved a capacity for grammar.”

Which begs the question, is it necessary to go that far for the benefits of scientific discovery?

Like us on Facebook:
0 Comments

PIG TRIAL VERDICT: PIGS LOSE, PETA WINS

In short, the lawyers ineptly argued that pigs are not property, and then went on to argue that they are property.

The only label you need on egg cartons: exploitative

We have to recognize that the ‘free range’ campaign (and the many chicken related campaigns like it) is as frivolous as the ‘humane meat’ one.

The True Carnage of the Film “Carnage” – Part 2

It fails as education because whatever useful information it manages to convey, any benefit of this is negated by the confusion it fosters in an arena that is already beset with massive confusion.