Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

Jillian Michaels Wants Congress to Stop Funding Loser Foods

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

Fitness trainer and lifestyle guru Jillian Michaels is urging the government to cut subsidies for “big loser” foods.

In letters written to House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, she spoke in favor of a five-step program that would eliminate programs that support the consumption of processed meat, cheese, candy, sugar and processed/junk food.

The program is laid out by the Physician’s Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM), and suggests that the government: end direct agribusiness payments, privatize crop insurance, force factory farms to clean up their own waste, reform food stamps and reform commodity food purchases. According to the PCRM, these five changes could save taxpayers $383 billion over a 10-year period, as well as reduce obesity weights and future health care costs.

Michaels wrote in her letters, “Cutting subsidies for unhealthful foods would trim the nation’s budget—and Americans’ waistlines. Some of our government’s current policies and programs actually promote obesity and other diseases by supporting the production and consumption of the very foods that contribute to… health problems.” 

PCRM President Dr. Neal Barnard is particularly interested in reforming the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), aka food stamps, to offer incentives for healthy food purchases. “SNAP is under threat when more Americans than ever need help. These reforms save SNAP and will serve more people for less money with healthier food.”

PCRM’s plan would also work toward providing school children with healthier food options and fighting childhood obesity.

 

Like us on Facebook:
0 Comments

Protesting Kylie Jenner’s Use of Fur Doesn’t Help Animals

Campaigns against fur, whether that’s at the PETA level or a small mobbing like this, don’t work because they promote the use of other animal products.

Collaborating with animal exploiters won’t help animals

The two sides claim to both have the “health and well-being of animals” in mind in this partnership, but one likely said “after profitability” under their breath.

Exploitation for art is no worse than exploitation for dinner

It always seems to come back to a confused juror deciding when animal use is justified.