Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

John DenverJohn Denver

John Denver Might Not Get His Rocky Mountain High

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

John Denver

Born Henry John Deutschendorf, a rising folk singer in the late 60s changed his name to John Denver and made it big time with “Rocky Mountain High,” his ode to Colorado’s natural beauty — and now one of the state’s official songs. You’d think with those credentials, it would be a walk in the park to go ahead and name a Aspen-area mountaintop the “John Denver Peak.”

Well, if it was easy, we wouldn’t be writing about it.

Yes, there are those in the greater Aspen area who oppose naming the peak for the guitar-yielding nature lover. Why? Some point out that Denver was not a native son of the state. (The singer was born in Roswell, New Mexico.) Bloggers like Lou Dawson think that Denver’s contributions to conservation were not as large as they seem. Still others blame songs like “Rocky Mountain High” for bringing too many people (and their environmental footprint) to the state.

The decision to name the peak now rests with the U.S. Board on Geographic Names.

Could the public’s concerns really prevent the naming of “John Denver Peak?”

Via: NPR

Like us on Facebook:
0 Comments

Protesting Kylie Jenner’s Use of Fur Doesn’t Help Animals

Campaigns against fur, whether that’s at the PETA level or a small mobbing like this, don’t work because they promote the use of other animal products.

Collaborating with animal exploiters won’t help animals

The two sides claim to both have the “health and well-being of animals” in mind in this partnership, but one likely said “after profitability” under their breath.

Exploitation for art is no worse than exploitation for dinner

It always seems to come back to a confused juror deciding when animal use is justified.