Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

chicken screenshotchicken screenshot

PETA Thinks New York Times Chicken Too Sexy

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

On Wednesday, the New York Times ran a photo of a raw chicken in the food section with a story on the appeal of chicken skin– the crispy, savory kind. The chicken was posed for the photo in what could be seen as a seductive pose with crossed drumsticks and a wing resting gently on its thigh. The raw chicken bared its breast for the photo which read, “Chicken’s attraction is truly skin deep.” PETA has been very vocal about criticizing the editor of The New York Times for running the photo of the sexy chicken.

PETA’s founder and president, Ingrid Newkirk, told The Atlantic Wire, “When I saw it I just couldn’t believe that an editor of ‘The New York Times’ would find it acceptable. It’s downright offensive, not just to people who care about animals but almost to everyone. It’s plucked, beheaded, young chicken in a young pose.” Newkirk then called the photo necrophilia adding, “It’s not amusing. It’s just ghastly and sickly. It’s not fitting for The New York Times.”

Necrophilia is the sexual attraction to corpses, for those who might be unfamiliar with the term.

What is rather surprising is how offensive the animal-rights group finds the picture. After all, the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, have used sexual innuendo for years in their campaigns. The organizations most recent campaign shows Angela Simmons representing a biblical Eve in all her naked glory wearing only her hair and ivy with the slogan,”Eating Meat is a Sin: Go Vegetarian.”

PETA’s ads and campaigns have often come under criticism for being vulgar (shark with a swimmer’s leg coming out its mouth), sexually explicit (PETA’s banned superbowl commercial), and provocative. It is ironic that the group which has no trouble using the sex appeal of animals (ie. humans) has problems when the New York Times uses sex appeal with animals (ie. chickens).

Perhaps it is as Piper Weiss of Yahoo! Shine points out, “Maybe she’s mad that the Times stole a signature PETA move. For years, their print and commercial campaigns have relied on sex, particularly naked women, to attract media attention.”

PETA is still planning to use sex to get out their animal rights message. The group plans to launch a porn site in the near future.

One could argue that PETA’s use of live animals in ad campaigns with naked men and women might be seen as beastiality, but that claim would be outrageous just like Newkirks comparing the New York Times photo of the chicken to necrophilia is.

Like us on Facebook:
  • Jory Hamilton

    Kids play with food. It’s fun.
    The editor plays with food. It’s fun. It’s artistic.
    It’s not a big deal. The more you criticize the ad, the more free advertisement they get.

  • peta sucks

    “A naked man or woman using their body to get an important point across is voluntary and under his or her full control.”
    Not if they’ve been brainwashed by Prostitutes & Evil Tyrants for Animals into going naked for their cause against their will. Let’s face it, People Eating Tasty Animals should stop being Psychopaths for Unethical Treatment of Humans! Down with peta, up with ethical treatment of animals!

  • Wowzers

    The next person who WILLINGLY poses naked for Plonkers Endlessly Terrorizing All (instead of being brainwashed into doing so against their will) would be the first.

  • Wowzers

    People Eating Tasty Animals spin doctor Ingrid “Nazijerk” should appear naked in one of these ads, preferably alongside fellow People Eating Tasty Animals spin doctor Gary “Youroffkey” (who began giving pro-peta-approved-diet speeches on behalf of dirty rotten peta and the cowardly ALF in 2002) in a “We’d rather go naked than wear fur” ad. Has she ever heard of getting a taste of your own medicine!

  • Wowzers

    I’d like to see peta give NONHUMAN predators credit for being notorious animal abusers!

  • Wowzers

    WILLINGLY pose naked for peta? There’s a first for everything!
    People Eating Tasty Animals: Brainwashing people into going naked for our case against their will since 1980

  • peta still sucks

    Correction: The humans that peta uses were brainwashed into going naked for their cause against their will (and are most definitely NOT willing participants!).


Chef thinks breeding & killing endangered animals is the only way to save them

Pretending it’s better to live and be killed than it is to not live at all is just a selfish, ignorant excuse to continue using animals.


Protesters more upset about chicken cannibalism than people eating chickens

Anything less than advocating an end to all animal use sells these chickens and other animals out.


Celebrity nutrition is the new disaster tourism

Celebrities have become the new nutritional experts in our post-truth world.