Elton John’s predictable & unsure why Ecorazzi comments on topics unrelated to green news. But here’s my view. If a homo is going to be risky, take part in promiscuous sex & not use condoms, then I don’t sympathize with him if he gets AIDS, just as I don’t sympathize with straights who get VD after a man has sex with many women & doesn’t use condoms. Elton John himself is a recovered drug junky.

But homosexuality & GID (sex changes are worse) are bad in & of themselves. What they must do is find a cure for homosexuality & lesbianism no matter why it happens. Why people turn out gay & lesbian is the same as why people get heart attacks & cancer. Some turn out gay & lesbian because of sex abuse & 33% of gays report being homosexually raped in youth-these people are gay behaviorally speaking though homosexuality’s not true orientation. Then there are people who take part in gay & lesbian activities because of biological defect such as birth defect if it’s inborn or hormonal defect-scientists don’t know. If a woman smokes marijuana while pregnant, the likelihood is more that the baby will turn out gay or lesbian-this is speculation. If true then fetal alcohol syndrome & pot smoking by pregnant moms may cause homosexuality. American Indians have higher homosexuality rates maybe it’s linked to marijuana & peyote smoking by American Indian women while pregnant. Anyhow, drugs are gay & now we can know why pot & tobacco are sometimes called fags.

Herwin, Elton John was a drug junky & recovered alcoholic-his views on AIDS is worthless & useless-maybe the drugs he used in his youth damaged his thinking or possibly caused his homosexuality. I know about AIDS in Africa & as said, if straight people take up risky activities & get VD or AIDS, then I don’t feel sorry for them. But just because straight people sometimes take up risky activities doesn’t change the fact that gay & lesbian activities are bad for health. Also it’s not Judeo-Christians & Moslems who see something wrong with homosexuality. I’m a non-religious person-my parents were Indian Hindus but I myself am non-religious & I see something wrong with homosexuality & I’m against sex changes-GID is worse than homosexuality.

Herwin, I used to be neutral on homosexuality but in 2005 I changed it to thinking it’s best a cure is found for it no matter why it happens. Those who take part in gay & lesbian activities have higher copathologies such as drug junkyism, anti-social conduct, suicides, domestic violence, etc. Most violence against gays whether it’s assault&battery to murder happen to be domestic violence cases such as gay kills gay lover during quarrel but those cases get local press coverage. If a straight man kills a gay man, then it gets national press coverage because it’s strange & odd. I’m against starting fights but if a gay is going to be anti-social such as grab a man’s butt or groin against will (assault&battery), then a man has a right to use just force to self-defend. If the man reacts by bashing or killing the gay, then yes, it maybe excessive but the man overreacted to a crime the gay did. Also proposing to some1 (both gay or straight) repeatedly after they’ve said no is harassment. Most gay bashings when done by straight men (which again are few cases which the press covers) happen because the man reacts or overreacts to abuse the gay 1st did but it’s politically wrong to say this.

As it’s about AIDS, I’ll repeat that if a homo’s going to have sex with many men & not use condoms, then I don’t sympathise with him if he gets AIDS, esp. if the gay uses drugs during sex. He took the risk & 1 of the risks of promiscuity w/o condoms or even with condoms are Venereal Disease (I like the old word VD) & AIDS. Yes with AIDS, babies sometimes get the disease from their moms & people sometimes get the disease from tainted blood transfusions. But homosexual AIDS victims are just not sympathetic victims as they knowingly took the risk. Your turn Herwin.

There is speculation that marijuana smoking during pregnancy may cause homosexuality/lesbianism in babies. I admit it's speculation & there isn't any proof to back this. But if it's true, then it puts meaning into why marijuana (like tobacco) can be called a fag & the slogan drugs are gay would have validity. Elton John's a junky, so his lectures are worthless. But I don't know why Ecorazzi is so busy promoting the homo agenda. Homosexual & lesbian activities don't result in procreation. Sex is supposed to be limited to penis-vaginal sex between man & woman or no sex @ all. Sex changes are mutilations. Just because homosexuality is found in animals doesn't change the fact that homosexuality is bad. Cannibalism is found amongst bears, cats & other species. If male Silverback gorillas, langurs, baboons or males of other species want to start families, if they come upon a female with young, they'll kill or drive out the female's young & mate to start their own family. Does Nathan Kutch then believe men should have the right to kill a woman's husband & kids to start his own family because that's found among animals? Rodents sometimes eat their young & domestic cats sometimes eat their dead kittens. Does Nathan Kutch believe people should have a right to cannibalism because animals do it? Nathan Kutch talks rubbish. Homosexual & lesbian activities are worthless & it's useless to sanitize it. Again, I'll repeat that my views are not based on any religion as I'm a non-religious person, so there are non-religious people such as me who oppose homosexuality.