Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

Animal Fats as Fuel for Planes, Trains and Automobiles

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

There is no doubt that biofuels are an important aspect in the green movement. Many celebrities have encouraged the use of biofuel. Daryl Hannah founded the Sustainable Biodiesel Alliance to help reduce our dependence on foreign fossil fuels. Hannah, who is a strict vegan, uses biofuels that are derived from renewable plants such as corn, soy, peanuts, and hemp. Other biodiesel options include biofuels derived from animal fats, vegetable oils, and grease. Tyson Foods has decided to further capitalize on the animal fats produced in slaughterhouses.

A partnership between Tyson Foods, Inc. and Syntroleum Corporation has created Dynamic Fuels, a joint venture that makes millions of gallons of animal-fat-based diesel a year. Forbes has reported that Dynamic Fuels has announced the sale of millions of gallons of the animal-fat biodiesel to Norfolk Southern railroad. The 50/50 mix of conventional jet fuel and renewable jet fuel will be used to power freight trains.

Flights using the animal-fat biofuel are already taking place. Alaskan Airlines, Finnair, and Thomson Airways have initiated flights using Dynamic Fuels’ renewable jet fuel and have scheduled over 200 more flights that will use the biofuel.

There are some good qualities to animal-fat-based biodiesel. It offers higher energy content, better cold flow properties (it functions better in cold weather), and reduces carbon dioxide emissions. All of these qualities are what people seek in a “green” alternative energy source. But what is the risk to animals?

Millions of animals are slaughtered in Tyson Foods slaughterhouses each year. Adding other slaughterhouses to the equation ups that number up exorbitantly. Roughly 10 billion pounds of animal fats are produced each year from slaughterhouses across the United States. Most of it is not thrown away. In fact, animal-fats are used in soaps, crayons, cosmetics, shortening and other products. There really isn’t a whole lot left over to make fuel with.

According to Forbes, “The Dynamic Fuels plant, and other bigger one being developed by oil refining giant Valero Energy, will soak up about 10% of total fat supplies.” This begs the question: Will more animals be needlessly slaughtered to produce more animal-fat for this new biofuel industry?

Another downside is the cost. Syntroleum has reported that it is losing money in this venture and that it won’t be able to turn a profit until buyers are convinced to pay a premium for this newer, better fuel.

Like us on Facebook:
  • Eric

    is anyone using biofuel made from algae yet?

  • Steph

    And it will fall down onto the earth and every piece of land here will smell like animal fat. Just when I thought this world couldn’t get MORE disgusting.

  • sutainkey_dotCom

    Great news on the sustainability front for the western hemisphere: USA produced biodiesel is increasingly coming from rendered animal fats – 20% in 2008 to over 30% in 2009 (see the National Renderers Association). Canada is ahead of us because of the 2003 Mad Cow Disease and 2005 Bird Flu – 90% of Canadian biodiesel comes from animal fat. I am thrilled to discover the market is growing fast toward the best fuel for today’s engines. http://sustainkey.com/animal-fat/

    This is fantastic use of a waste product.

Concerned about endangered animals? Stop eating them

Methods of animal conservation that support the exploitation of animals don’t exist for the animals, they exist for human profit.

Why we SHOULDN’T genetically ‘disenhance’ animals

Creating bandaid “solutions” to ethical problems we’ve created doesn’t address the issue at hand

What you can do if live exports disturb you

The outcry should go further than importation and should be directed at the fact that the animals in question were on their way to slaughter in the first place.