Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

Mickey Rourke Working to Build Animal Shelter in Romania

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

Foxy, the stray Mickey Rourke adopted while filming the thriller “Dead in Tombstone” in Romania, isn’t the only lucky pup to benefit from Rourke’s love of dogs. After learning about the large stray dog population in the country, Rourke decided to help raise funds to build a much needed shelter.

The goal is to raise 1.5 million Euro. With a head start of $250,000 coming personally from the actor, they’ve got a good launch for their campaign.

This won’t just be a small animal shelter that can only help a hundred or so dogs at a time. The Bucharest Herald reports that Rourke wants the shelter to be as big as a football field and capable of caring for thousands of dogs. In a country where strays are a big problem, bigger really is better. Rourke knows “nobody will make any money from this investment,” which makes the donation and hard work on the project all the more admirable. He plans on going to Romania on an as needed basis to make sure the shelter project is going according to plan.

Rourke already has support in the country. Veterinarians Mircea Zeta and Simon Corneleu are on board.

Don’t you just love it when actors with big wallets have equally big hearts?

Photo Credit: Featureflash / Shutterstock.com

Like us on Facebook:
0 Comments
  • Maria Ramalho

    I thank you from the bottom of my heart!

  • Hummingbirdglen

    I hope it will be a NO KILL shelter. That would be impressive

Protesting Kylie Jenner’s Use of Fur Doesn’t Help Animals

Campaigns against fur, whether that’s at the PETA level or a small mobbing like this, don’t work because they promote the use of other animal products.

Collaborating with animal exploiters won’t help animals

The two sides claim to both have the “health and well-being of animals” in mind in this partnership, but one likely said “after profitability” under their breath.

Exploitation for art is no worse than exploitation for dinner

It always seems to come back to a confused juror deciding when animal use is justified.