Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

Stella McCartney tells Interview Magazine her proudest moment is remaining animal-friendlyStella McCartney tells Interview Magazine her proudest moment is remaining animal-friendly

Stella McCartney Proud of Not Using Animals in Fashion

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

Fashion designer Stella McCartney recently spoke with Interview Magazine and revealed some interesting facts about her life including some her most proudest moments, her biggest surprises and of course her love of animals and the environment.

When it comes to creating responsible fashion pieces, for McCartney it’s not easy as it sounds. “My biggest surprises in my everyday job have to do with the challenges of trying to be slightly more responsible as a brand . . . You just have to be very agile. When you’re trying to have moments of responsibility in the fashion industry, it’s not as easy as just doing the same old handbag every season with the same old factory in the same old materials.”

For the 40-year-old, it’s obvious this doesn’t get her down, since she is one of the most successful A-list designers. She manages to create fabulous collections, all while remaining eco-friendly (one of her most proudest moments).

“I think the moment that I’m very proud of is building a business without using animals. And, hopefully, changing people’s perception of how you can do luxury fashion,” she revealed.

In addition to her business, McCartney incorporates an animal-friendly lifestyle at home. She grew up on a farm and now has her own, which she enjoys with her husband and four children.

“It’s my favorite place to be. In a field on a horse, with my kids on little horses behind me. We rescued three ponies from New Forest [in Hampshire, England]. They round up the wild ponies and they auction them for dog food and everything, so we rescued three, and that’s what they ride.”

McCartney strives to make a difference, not only in her personal life, but in the fashion world.

“My job at the end of the day is to design timeless, desirable, beautiful products. It’s not about just designing a bunch of organic jumpers. I have a balance within the brand. If you try to create something people enjoy, and it happens to be made in a responsible way, then that’s when you can really strike an incredible balance,” she said.

“I’m also a real believer that just doing a little something is really a lot better than doing a lot of nothing.”

Photo Credit: Featureflash / Shutterstock.com

Like us on Facebook:
  • Sheryl Bottner

    Vegan except when she uses silk and wool in her clothing line. Riding horses? Also not vegan.

    • felisdarkmoon

      Probably you don’t live in farm, because you would know that sheep shearing is necessary for their health. Even to some kinds sheep the fleece peel away from the body naturally.

      I respect vegan ideology but sometimes they go too far. For example after wool produce stopped in my country, number of sheeps drastically reduces, for only several decades, lost breed selective for hundreds of years . I accept to not eat meat and do not exploitation animals, responsible care, as close to nature as possible. But when we had no need of the sheep, just stopped to care for them. Whole herds are deprived of the opportunity to exist and simply disappear. It’s not like with the wild animals, farm can’t live without humans.

    • guest

      Pity you clearly don’t understand the bond between horses and humans.

Concerned about endangered animals? Stop eating them

Methods of animal conservation that support the exploitation of animals don’t exist for the animals, they exist for human profit.

Why we SHOULDN’T genetically ‘disenhance’ animals

Creating bandaid “solutions” to ethical problems we’ve created doesn’t address the issue at hand

What you can do if live exports disturb you

The outcry should go further than importation and should be directed at the fact that the animals in question were on their way to slaughter in the first place.