Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

USDA Proposes to Allow Poultry Industry to Self-Inspect

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

As early as next week, the government will end debate on the USDA’s modernization proposal to allow companies that produce chicken for sale to perform meat-safety inspections.

For the last twelve years, the USDA has been running pilot programs throughout the US in twenty poultry plants and claims, despite projected savings of $85 million over three years from inspection layoffs, that the plan is not about cost-cutting, but elevating food safety. Poultry producers expect to save more than $250 million a year because they will be be allowed to speed up their processing line, almost doubling production from 90 birds per minute to 175. Moreover, under the new proposal, production lines will have only one USDA inspector at the end of the line. Currently, traditional poultry lines have up to three USDA inspectors.

Whistleblower inspectors opposed to the new rule contend that companies cannot be trusted to adequately perform safety inspection duties. They argue that companies regularly pressure employees not to stop or slow down the line, making thorough inspection for tumors, contaminants, and evidence of disease nearly impossible to spot.

According to OMB Watch, a government accountability newsletter, existing USDA cutbacks coincide with a sizeable increase in salmonella outbreaks. 2010 was a record year for salmonella outbreaks and 2011 saw the most recalls of meat, eggs, and poultry in a decade. The USA claims to plan increasing the number of scientific tests to look for microbiotic disease invisible to the human eyes of inspectors, yet they have not been able to furnish data that show an increase in lab testing during the pilot program.

Watchdog groups insist that both increased testing and government inspection is necessary to lower salmonella and other disease outbreaks from poultry. On their website, The National Chicken Council states that while “plant employees would have an expanded role in inspecting carcasses,” USDA inspectors will still be present in the plant. They also claim to be “confident that modernizing the poultry inspection system will enable us to build on our success in providing delicious, safe and wholesome food to our customers.”

With chicken surpassing beef and pork in sales and the average American consuming 84 pounds of chicken a year, let’s hope that’s the case. A sure and healthier bet, however, is to give up eating it altogether.

paul prescott / Shutterstock.com

Like us on Facebook:
  • Eli

    The worst idea EVER!!

Beyoncé and Jay-Z sell out veganism for ticket giveaway

Veganism deserves better than constantly being considered something to be bribed, dared or loosely entered into.

Month one of “the year of the vegan”

News outlets are abuzz with the promise of new vegan products, celebs, and services and how that is somehow a fresh affirmation that our world is one turn closer to being fully free from animal use.

What About: “No-Kill” Eggs?

The reason for these advancements is not a sense of justice – because that can only mean going vegan – but is primarily driven by economics.

Vegandale Brewery offers the ultimate vegan night out

This brewpub helps veganism shed its stay-home-and-eat-tofu stereotype.

Don’t blame vegans for the shame you feel about using animals

The shame Carly Lewis claims veganism casts over her is more likely the ghosts of moral uncertainty, spectres that are more likely fish than cows, wondering how morality can possibly be used as ammunition in favour of murder.