Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

Burger King to Eliminate Gestation Crates and Battery Cages

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

Together with the Humane Society of the United States, Burger King – the world’s second largest fast food chain – has announced plans to eliminate the use of battery cages and gestation crates from their US food suppliers by 2017. Under the new policy, Burger King will also switch entirely to cage-free eggs for all American locations.

According to HSUS president Wayne Pacelle, this move is significant not only because “tens of thousands of animals will now be in better living conditions,” but “because Burger King is such a big purchaser of these products,” using hundreds of millions of eggs and tens of millions of pounds of pork a year.

The growing public demand for sustainably and humanely raised food and “the corporate social responsibility” of companies such as Wendy’s, McDonald’s, and the Compass Group mark a sea change in animal welfare. The aforementioned restaurants have all announced within the last two months that they will begin utilizing more humane animal treatment methods. In spite of these advances and pressure from HSUS, some companies, such as pork producer Seaboard Corporation and restaurant chains Bob Evans, Tim Hortons, and Domino’s, continue to utilize gestation crates.

Pacelle hopes that Burger King’s announcement will help persuade Congress to pass H.R. 3798, which would ban battery cages and enable more humane options, such as colony cages, cage-free, or free-range, to proliferate.

Photo credit: Shutterstock/paul prescott

Like us on Facebook:
0 Comments

Concerned about endangered animals? Stop eating them

Methods of animal conservation that support the exploitation of animals don’t exist for the animals, they exist for human profit.

Why we SHOULDN’T genetically ‘disenhance’ animals

Creating bandaid “solutions” to ethical problems we’ve created doesn’t address the issue at hand

What you can do if live exports disturb you

The outcry should go further than importation and should be directed at the fact that the animals in question were on their way to slaughter in the first place.