Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

This year India will become the world's largest exporter of beef.This year India will become the world's largest exporter of beef.

India Set to Become World's Largest Beef Exporter

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

Here’s a weird fact: India, a country known for its reverence of cows, is set to become the world’s largest exporter of beef this year.

New data from the USDA shows that by the end of 2012, India will have exported approximately 1.5 million metric tons of beef, placing it ahead of Brazil, Australia and the U.S.

Treehugger is quick to point out how strange that seems: “Yes, a nation in which cow slaughter is officially prohibited and utterly anathema to the majority of the population due to tradition and/or religion, will overtake three icons of cattle ranching and beef eating.”

How? Simple. There’s a loophole.

Or more specifically, a technical distinction. The USDA report doesn’t distinguish between the meat of a cow and that of a water buffalo. While killing cattle in India is prohibited, water buffalo (at least, those not currently producing milk) are fair game for the beef industry.

So all that “beef,” which is being shipped to the Middle East, North Africa and Southeast Asia, is actually water buffalo meat, and according to the Atlantic, it “sell[s] at low cost to the meat-hungry but price-sensitive consumers” in the aforementioned countries.

So it turns out that the highly revered cows of India are actually okay.

Does that make you feel any better? Didn’t think so.

Photo credit: Shutterstock.com

Like us on Facebook:
0 Comments

Protesting Kylie Jenner’s Use of Fur Doesn’t Help Animals

Campaigns against fur, whether that’s at the PETA level or a small mobbing like this, don’t work because they promote the use of other animal products.

Collaborating with animal exploiters won’t help animals

The two sides claim to both have the “health and well-being of animals” in mind in this partnership, but one likely said “after profitability” under their breath.

Exploitation for art is no worse than exploitation for dinner

It always seems to come back to a confused juror deciding when animal use is justified.