Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

USDA retracts Meatless Monday suggestion after anger from beef producers and politiciansUSDA retracts Meatless Monday suggestion after anger from beef producers and politicians

USDA Bends to Beef, Retracts Meatless Monday Recommendation

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

Angry politicians took to Twitter this week after an internal memo recommending employees of the USDA participate in Meatless Monday as a way of reducing personal environmental impact drew ire from wealthy beef producers.

Republican Senator Chuck Grassley, for example, tweeted on Wednesday that he “will eat more meat on Monday to compensate for stupid USDA recommendation abt a meatless Monday,” and fellow Republican Senator John Thune expressed his opinion that Meatless Monday is an  “Anti-[agriculture] agenda.”

What got the farmland senators so riled up? The New York Times reports that the original newsletter posted on the USDA’s website read, in part, “One simple way to reduce your environmental impact while dining at our cafeterias is to participate in the ‘Meatless Monday’ initiative.” The memo explained further:

“How will going meatless one day of the week help the environment? The production of meat, especially beef (and dairy as well), has a large environmental impact. According to the U.N., animal agriculture is a major source of greenhouse gases and climate change. It also wastes resources. It takes 7,000 kg of grain to make 1,000 kg of beef. In addition, beef production requires a lot of water, fertilizer, fossil fuels, and pesticides. In addition there are many health concerns related to the excessive consumption of meat.”

But long and short term environmental and resource-use awareness, even combined with knowledge of the detrimental health effects of over-consumption of factory-farmed red meat, couldn’t compete with the lure of the dollar. As Dan Mitchell of CNN’s Fortune points out, “The USDA was created to both promote and to regulate the same industry. Whenever its health-and-environment mission is pitted directly against its promotion mission, promotion usually wins.”

A (properly cleared, apparently) USDA press team employee tweeted at the Farm Bureau, “USDA does not endorse Meatless Monday. Statement found on USDA website was posted w/o proper clearance. It has been removed.”

Though saddened that the USDA backed down, we applaud the original memo’s intent and hope that, officially or not, some employees did get the message. When even the prosciutto-loving Mario Batali endorses Meatless Monday, there’s got to be some hope. Don’t let Chuck Grassley win; take the pledge yourself or, if you already eat meatless, suggest it to someone you care about.

Photo Credit:  Maria Dryfhout / Shutterstock

Like us on Facebook:
  • This is HORRIBLE! What a shame

  • Karina1

    These people are terrified of veganism. I hope they do eat more meat on Mondays it will just kill them sooner.

  • Liesma

    “wealthy beef producers”…are you kidding me? Beef is at an all time low. And what is out there is having to be sold due to drought…that’s why the low prices, as there’s a glut right now…You know farmers don’t just grow your beef. They also grow your veggies. Every time a farm goes under, it’s not always just meat you’re losing but those precious vegetables you only want to eat. Unless you’re a conglomerate growing vegetables, farmers grow varieties of crops so as to stave off going under. Beef, pork, grains–a lot of beef growers also grow many varieties of grain. Even soy beans. Our farm grows beef, wheat, soy beans, corn, and alfalfa. Drought has hit us very hard in all areas this year. Soy beans are at a high price because most are withering away…so wealthy? Hardly. And we aren’t a conglomerate, so no we get no subsidies. Any subsidies smaller farms do get from the govt. actually are taken from any farm profits or paid back via loans. Bet you didn’t know that either, Being a farmer isn’t a free hand out despite what you hear..Especially when equipment cost upwards of $100,000 or more…so most equipment today is bought second hand and shared between farmers, So if your neighbor is using the combine when a hail storm comes along, you’re s*** out of luck and your wheat goes down the tubes… Not quite as productive as everyone likes to lead people to believe. Think about that when you shun certain foods…

    • klhpensil21 .

      I don’t think this article is referring to the struggling farmers you are talking about. They’re the minority. It’s referring to wealthy meat-producing corporations who only want to suck the money out of you and me.

  • Liesma

    Gave a lesson on farming which was unaccepted. How unsurprising…

  • Sick of austerity Measures

    After the glut from the drout is over and there is a shortage of meat, it may come down to meatless mon-wed-fri for most families when burger hits $10/lb

  • kittylu

    Mystery meat mondays might do ok while millions of cows are being culled because of the drought but we’ll see what the menu looks like next year.

  • csimoni

    We see who is really in charge here. Don’t ever think the USDA is going to protect you.

What About Zero Waste?

Going vegan must be at the heart of any environmental discussion.

Why it doesn’t matter if the Impossible burger is healthy

The Impossible burger doesn’t need to be overtly healthy – it just needs to be vegan.

France’s ban of faux-meat branding won’t stop veganism

I’ll take “mycoproteinous food tube” over a tube of dead pig any day.