Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

WATCH: Colbert Goes After Iowa Congressman on Dog Fighting

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

Stephen Colbert took a nice chunk out of Iowa Congressman Steve King for his nonsensical arguments against new federal anti-dog fighting laws.

Colbert didn’t need to try hard to make a fool out of the Congressman. King argued that if we don’t have a law banning humans from fighting other humans, we shouldn’t be banning dog fights. He said, “It’s wrong to rate animals above human beings.”

Colbert’s response to that bit of insanity was the following: “If two consenting adults want to fight under the auspices of the WBA, why not two consenting dogs?” He goes on to tell the “Cinderella” story of a “troubled young dog from a tough neighborhood looking for a way off the street” and how he finds a gym to go and train so he can fight other dogs. The punchline? The funnyman says, “And when that dog feels ready, he enters the ring to prove to the world and to himself that he’s got the talent and tenacity to be a winner…Or a loser, in which case he’s killed. That’s how Cinderella ends, right?” Maybe not Cinderella, but that certainly is the way dog fights end.

The idea that Congressman King could attempt to make an argument that humans fighting humans in a ring is the same as dogs being forced to fight one another to the death is so ridiculous it’s, as Colbert proves, laughable. However, it’s less laughable that it’s an elected official making such absurd remarks.

Thankfully, if you’re going to have a Congressman speak out against an important law, you do want him to sound as idiotic as possible. King doesn’t disappoint. He goes on (and on and on) to make strange and erroneous arguments as to why taking any steps toward protecting animals is really taking away from protecting humans. I won’t give away any more of Colbert’s retorts. You’ll want to watch them for yourself.

The Colbert Report Mon – Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
Steve King’s Dogfighting Defense
Colbert Report Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog Video Archive
Like us on Facebook:
  • Ban the Fur Trade

    Brilliant! I’m so sick of hearing that argument from non-animal people. If we waited until every bit of human suffering in the world was eliminated before even thinking about helping animals, we’d never get anywhere!

  • pdquick

    Colbert kills!!

Concerned about endangered animals? Stop eating them

Methods of animal conservation that support the exploitation of animals don’t exist for the animals, they exist for human profit.

Why we SHOULDN’T genetically ‘disenhance’ animals

Creating bandaid “solutions” to ethical problems we’ve created doesn’t address the issue at hand

What you can do if live exports disturb you

The outcry should go further than importation and should be directed at the fact that the animals in question were on their way to slaughter in the first place.