Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

Lea Michele Lands $1 Million L’Oréal Contract (Report)

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

In a move that may prove unpopular with animal rights activists, Lea Michele has reportedly just landed a lucrative contract to promote cosmetics giant L’Oréal. According to the New York Post, the deal is rumored to be worth $1M and will feature the “Glee” star as one of the faces for the brand.

While not the head scratcher that is Ellen DeGeneres’ decision to front for notorious animal-tester CoverGirl and its parent company Procter & Gamble, L’Oréal recently has earned its own scorn from AR groups.

The company, long praised for its stance on zero animal testing, was recently stripped of the internationally-recognized “Leaping Bunny” logo (which designates companies as cruelty-free), after it was revealed that they had resumed testing for the $16B Chinese cosmetics market.

By law, all companies wishing to sell cosmetics in China must fund animal testing of their products in Chinese laboratories in order for them to be sold to the public.

Back in July, comedian Ricky Gervais blasted companies like L’Oréal, Johnson and Johnson, Pantene, and others for their decisions to abandon their principals for the sake of profits.

“China’s cosmetics market is worth billions of dollars and virtually every major global cosmetic company is getting a piece of the action,” he continued. “It remains one of the few countries in the world to insist on animal testing, so companies manufacturing there have made the very clear choice to test lipsticks and shampoo on animals to increase their profit margins.”

Thankfully, not all companies have put on the blinders to embrace China. After finding out that they would have to pursue animal testing in the country, hair-care giant John Paul Mitchell Systems put all sales on hold and refused to comply with the law.

“Since Paul Mitchell was founded in 1980, we have been cruelty-free,” CEO and co-founder John Paul DeJoria told the UK Daily Mail. “We do not conduct or condone animal testing on our products, and we will not attempt to market our products in China until alternatives to animal testing methods have been accepted by the government.

He added: “Paul Mitchell always has been and always will be cruelty-free.”

It could be that Lea knows absolutely nothing about L’Oréal’s testing in China, but playing the ignorance card isn’t something of comfort. For someone as passionate about animal rights – from the plight of NYC carriage horses to anti-fur PSAs to pet adoption – it’s a bummer of a move.

“I have such a passion because I adore animals so much,” she said earlier this year. Now’s the time to pull a Paul Mitchell and prove it.

Photo credit: Shutterstock.com

Like us on Facebook:
0 Comments
  • sk

    I agree! I am so sick of celebrities who claim they’re vegan & love animals & then promote companies who test their products on animals. Playing ignorance is unacceptable. It’s obvious money means more to these people than their claim to respect & love animals. It’s so disappointing Lea Michele is now in this group.

Beyoncé and Jay-Z sell out veganism for ticket giveaway

Veganism deserves better than constantly being considered something to be bribed, dared or loosely entered into.

Month one of “the year of the vegan”

News outlets are abuzz with the promise of new vegan products, celebs, and services and how that is somehow a fresh affirmation that our world is one turn closer to being fully free from animal use.

What About: “No-Kill” Eggs?

The reason for these advancements is not a sense of justice – because that can only mean going vegan – but is primarily driven by economics.

Vegandale Brewery offers the ultimate vegan night out

This brewpub helps veganism shed its stay-home-and-eat-tofu stereotype.

Don’t blame vegans for the shame you feel about using animals

The shame Carly Lewis claims veganism casts over her is more likely the ghosts of moral uncertainty, spectres that are more likely fish than cows, wondering how morality can possibly be used as ammunition in favour of murder.