Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

Climate Change Costs World Whopping $1.2 Trillion Annually

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

A new study released yesterday by the non-governmental org DARA estimates that climate change is already costing the world more than $1.2 trillion per year and annually causing the deaths of over 400,000 people.

The 331-page study, entitled Climate Vulnerability Monitor: A Guide to the Cold Calculus of A Hot Planet included input by more than 50 scientists, economists and policy experts, and commissioned by 20 governments.

“Continuing today’s patterns of carbon-intensive energy use is estimated, together with climate change, to cause 6 million deaths per year by 2030, close to 700,000 of which would be due to climate change,” the study warns. “This implies that a combined climate-carbon crisis is estimated to claim 100 million lives between now and the end of the next decade.”

Not surprisingly, the world’s poorest nations will suffer the most – with some 380,000 alone expected to perish from hunger in the year 2030.

“Poverty reduction efforts are in peril as the potential temperature increase the world is already committed to has only begun to be realized, and the world’s major economies are in no way spared,” the authors continue. “The United States, China and India in particular are expected to incur enormous losses that in 2030 for these three countries alone will collectively total 2.5 trillion dollars in economic costs and over 3 million deaths per year, or half of all mortality – the majority in India and China.”

While the study credits the world carbon-economy for the massive shift in wealth and growth over the last 200 years, it says such an economic system, while able to support 1 to 2 billion people, is ill-suited for a global population in excess of 7 billion and growing.

“Some quite serious damage is now unavoidable, but certain losses can still be reduced in the short term,” they add. “In particular, human costs can be transferred to economic costs. This can be achieved through programmes aimed at reducing rural poverty – at the origin of hunger deaths and many communicable diseases afflicting the world’s poorest groups, with risks that worsen with climate change. Or it can be achieved by ensuring clean air regulations, safer working conditions and modern energy options for people at risk due to carbon-intensive forms of energy.”

You can check out the full study here.

Like us on Facebook:
  • mememine

    Science has betrayed us once again after poisoning the planet with their pesticides and cancer causing chemicals as they still refuse to say any crisis “WILL” happen, only “might” and “could” and…
    NOT ONE single IPCC warning is without “maybes” despite “being at the tipping point, maybe” and threatening the voter’s children with deaths by CO2 is as good as voting for Romneycon. Climate change was Liberalism’s Iraq War of Climate WMD lies and fear mongering. Bush laughs and admires the legal exaggeration of “crisis”.
    *Occupywallstre­et does not even mention CO2 in its list of demands because of the bank-funded carbon trading stock markets run by corporations.

    *Obama has not mentioned the crisis in the last two State of the Unions addresses.

    *Julian Assange is of course a climate change denier.

    *Canada killed Y2Kyoto with a freely elected climate change denying prime minister and nobody cared, especially the millions of scientists warning us of unstoppable warming (a comet hit).

    Meanwhile, the entire world of SCIENCE, lazy copy and paste journalism and Liberal progressivism had allowed bank-funded and corporate-run “CARBON TRADING STOCK MARKETS”(ruled by trustworthy politicians) to trump the UN’s and entire world’s efforts into 3rd world fresh water relief, starvation rescue and 3rd world education for just over 26 years of insane attempts at climate CONTROL.

What About Zero Waste?

Going vegan must be at the heart of any environmental discussion.

Why it doesn’t matter if the Impossible burger is healthy

The Impossible burger doesn’t need to be overtly healthy – it just needs to be vegan.

France’s ban of faux-meat branding won’t stop veganism

I’ll take “mycoproteinous food tube” over a tube of dead pig any day.