Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

Tiny Vegetarian Dinosaur Might Have Made a Good Pet

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

There aren’t many dinosaurs researchers describe as potential good pets, but the Pegomastax africanus, despite its vampire-like teeth, was about the same size as housecat. Thankfully, much smaller than the famous Tyrannosaurus rex or the other scary carnivores we usually imagine roaming the earth.

They are described as being about 2 feet long, covered in quills and pecking at their food with a parrot-like beak. Paleontologist Paul Sereno said it must have looked like a “strange little bird.” Though they had fangs, they were used for foraging for food and defending itself from predators much like those of a fanged deer. They lived in the forests near rivers in southern Africa about 200 million years ago.

One part of the study of these creatures that impressed others in the field was Sereno’s work on the creature’s teeth. National Geographic reports, “The researcher suggested too that the cheek teeth in P. africanus’ upper and lower jaws worked like self-sharpening scissors for shearing plant parts.”

Sereno also joked about the dinosaur, “it would be a nice pet—if you could train it not to nip you.” We’re pretty sure the little herbivores were happier out foraging for food than being turned into a prickly lap cat, but it is fun to imagine sharing your home with a dinosaur.

Photo Credit: National Geographic and Tyler Keillor

Like us on Facebook:

Protesting Kylie Jenner’s Use of Fur Doesn’t Help Animals

Campaigns against fur, whether that’s at the PETA level or a small mobbing like this, don’t work because they promote the use of other animal products.

Collaborating with animal exploiters won’t help animals

The two sides claim to both have the “health and well-being of animals” in mind in this partnership, but one likely said “after profitability” under their breath.

Exploitation for art is no worse than exploitation for dinner

It always seems to come back to a confused juror deciding when animal use is justified.